Thursday, September 4, 2025

The First Five Minutes of Cardiac Arrest in the Intensive Care Unit

The First Five Minutes of Cardiac Arrest in the Intensive Care Unit: Maximizing Outcomes Through Evidence-Based Immediate Management

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in the intensive care unit (ICU) represents a critical emergency where the initial response within the first five minutes significantly determines patient outcomes. Despite advanced monitoring and immediate availability of trained personnel, ICU cardiac arrest mortality remains substantial at 60-80%.

Objective: To provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing the immediate management of cardiac arrest in the ICU setting during the crucial first five minutes, highlighting practical pearls, common pitfalls, and innovative approaches.

Methods: Comprehensive review of current literature, international guidelines, and expert consensus on ICU cardiac arrest management, with emphasis on interventions within the first 300 seconds.

Key Findings: The ICU environment offers unique advantages including continuous monitoring, immediate access to advanced airways, mechanical CPR devices, and extracorporeal support. However, specific challenges include complex patient populations, medication interactions, and decision-making regarding continuation versus limitation of care.

Conclusions: A systematic, time-sensitive approach to the first five minutes of ICU cardiac arrest, incorporating high-quality CPR, rapid rhythm analysis, immediate reversible cause identification, and judicious use of advanced ICU-specific interventions can significantly improve survival and neurological outcomes.

Keywords: Cardiac arrest, intensive care, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, critical care, emergency response

Introduction

Cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit presents a unique clinical scenario that differs significantly from ward-based or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. While ICU patients benefit from continuous monitoring, immediate access to advanced life support equipment, and the presence of trained critical care personnel, they often have multiple comorbidities, are on complex medication regimens, and may have pre-existing organ dysfunction that complicates resuscitation efforts.

The first five minutes following recognition of cardiac arrest represent the most critical period for intervention. During this timeframe, the quality of chest compressions, speed of defibrillation, and identification of reversible causes can dramatically influence both survival to discharge and neurological outcomes. Recent data suggest that survival from ICU cardiac arrest ranges from 20-40%, with neurologically intact survival occurring in 15-30% of cases.

This review synthesizes current evidence and expert recommendations to optimize management during these crucial first 300 seconds, providing practical guidance for critical care practitioners.

The Critical Timeline: Second-by-Second Analysis

Seconds 0-30: Recognition and Activation

Immediate Actions:

Confirm cardiac arrest: Check responsiveness and pulse (maximum 10 seconds)
Call for help: Activate code blue team while beginning CPR
Position patient: Ensure supine position on firm surface

Pearl: In mechanically ventilated patients, sudden loss of end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) with concurrent arrhythmia is often the first indicator of cardiac arrest, preceding pulse check.

Oyster: Don't delay CPR to remove family members from bedside - assign a team member to provide support and explanation while resuscitation continues.

Seconds 30-60: High-Quality CPR Initiation

Immediate Actions:

Begin chest compressions: 100-120/min, depth 2-2.4 inches (5-6 cm)
Ensure adequate ventilation: If intubated, continue mechanical ventilation at 10 breaths/min
Apply defibrillator pads: If not already connected to monitor

Hack: Use the bed's CPR mode immediately - this firms the surface and optimizes compression effectiveness. Many ICU beds have a "CPR button" that should be activated within the first 30 seconds.

Pearl: In ICU patients, avoid hyperventilation even more strictly than in other settings, as ICU patients often have pre-existing lung pathology that makes them more susceptible to ventilation-induced hemodynamic compromise.

Seconds 60-120: Rhythm Analysis and Defibrillation

Immediate Actions:

Analyze rhythm: Minimize CPR interruptions (<10 seconds)
Defibrillate if indicated: VF/pVT - deliver shock immediately
Continue CPR: Resume compressions within 10 seconds of shock

Pearl: ICU patients often develop VF/pVT as initial rhythm (40-50% vs. 25% on wards) due to electrolyte abnormalities, drug effects, and underlying cardiac disease.

Hack: Pre-charge the defibrillator during CPR when VF/pVT is suspected based on monitor waveform - this can save 10-15 seconds.

Seconds 120-180: Medication Administration and Advanced Interventions

Immediate Actions:

Establish vascular access: Use existing central lines when possible
Administer epinephrine: 1 mg IV/IO every 3-5 minutes for non-shockable rhythms
Consider advanced airway: If not already intubated

ICU-Specific Considerations:

Existing vasoactive drips: Continue norepinephrine/vasopressin infusions during arrest
Existing central access: Utilize for medication administration
Mechanical ventilation: Adjust to 10 breaths/min, FiO2 1.0

Pearl: In ICU patients on vasoactive support, don't discontinue existing drips during arrest - they may provide beneficial effects during CPR.

Seconds 180-300: Reversible Causes and ICU-Specific Interventions

The ICU "6 H's and 6 T's" Plus:

Traditional Reversible Causes:

Hypovolemia: Fluid bolus, blood products if indicated
Hypoxia: Optimize ventilation, consider pneumothorax
Hydrogen ions (acidosis): Rarely give bicarbonate in first 5 minutes
Hyperkalemia/Hypokalemia: Check recent labs, give calcium if hyperkalemic
Hypothermia: Rewarm if <32°C
Hypoglycemia: Check glucose, give dextrose if indicated
Thrombosis (coronary): Consider thrombolytics in appropriate patients
Thrombosis (pulmonary): High suspicion in ICU patients
Tamponade: POCUS evaluation, consider pericardiocentesis
Tension pneumothorax: Needle decompression
Toxins: Review medication list, consider specific antidotes
Tablets/Trauma: Consider recent procedures, bleeding

ICU-Specific Additions:

Mechanical ventilator malfunction: Switch to bag-mask ventilation
Medication errors/interactions: Review recent medication administration
Procedural complications: Recent lines, procedures, interventions

Advanced ICU-Specific Interventions

Mechanical CPR Devices

Indications for immediate deployment:

Anticipated prolonged resuscitation
Need for procedures during CPR (echocardiography, central access)
Provider fatigue concerns
Transport requirements

Pearl: Deploy mechanical CPR devices early (within 2-3 minutes) rather than waiting for provider fatigue - transition time is shorter when done earlier.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

Integration into CPR cycle:

Perform during pulse checks (minimize interruptions)
Focus on: cardiac standstill vs. PEA, tamponade, pneumothorax, hypovolemia

Hack: Designate one person as "POCUS operator" who is ready with probe during each pulse check to minimize rhythm analysis delays.

Extracorporeal CPR (ECPR)

Consider early in select patients:

Age <65 years with good neurological baseline
Witnessed arrest with bystander CPR
Initial shockable rhythm
No significant comorbidities

Pearl: If ECPR is available, the decision to initiate should be made within the first 10-15 minutes of arrest, requiring consideration during the initial resuscitation phase.

Quality Metrics and Real-Time Optimization

Continuous Quality Assessment

Monitor in real-time:

Compression depth and rate: Use CPR feedback devices
ETCO2 levels: Target >20 mmHg during CPR
Arterial pressure: If arterial line present, aim for diastolic >25 mmHg
Compression fraction: Target >80%

Hack: Assign a "quality officer" whose sole responsibility is monitoring CPR metrics and providing real-time feedback.

Team Dynamics and Communication

Closed-Loop Communication:

Clear role assignments within first minute
Designated team leader (usually senior ICU physician)
Time-keeper to announce intervals
Medication recorder

Pearl: The ICU team has an advantage in knowing the patient's history - designate someone to provide a rapid 30-second background summary to responding team members.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Clinical Pitfalls

Delayed recognition in sedated patients
- Solution: Continuous end-tidal CO2 monitoring
- Watch for sudden ETCO2 drop with concurrent arrhythmia
Over-reliance on technology
- Solution: Always confirm pulse absence manually
- Don't trust monitor readings in isolation
Inadequate compression depth on ICU beds
- Solution: Activate CPR mode immediately
- Consider moving to floor if bed malfunction
Medication dosing errors in obese patients
- Solution: Use actual body weight for epinephrine
- Have weight-based dosing cards readily available

System Pitfalls

Unclear code team leadership
- Solution: Pre-designated ICU physician as team leader
- Clear role assignments posted in rooms
Equipment failures
- Solution: Daily equipment checks
- Backup defibrillator immediately available
Family communication delays
- Solution: Assign team member to family support immediately
- Don't delay care for family discussions

Special Populations in the ICU

Post-Cardiac Surgery Patients

Special Considerations:

Emergency resternotomy equipment immediately available
Higher likelihood of tamponade or bleeding
Different medication considerations (anticoagulation status)

Pearl: In recent cardiac surgery patients (<7 days), have emergency resternotomy kit at bedside and consider early chest opening if arrest persists >5 minutes.

Transplant Recipients

Modified Approach:

Consider rejection/infection as precipitating factors
Immunosuppression affects response to medications
Higher baseline risk factors

Patients on ECMO/Mechanical Support

Unique Considerations:

Circuit evaluation as primary assessment
May not require chest compressions if adequate flow
Specialized team activation required

Evidence-Based Recommendations

Class I Recommendations (Strong Evidence)

High-quality CPR with minimal interruptions and adequate compression depth
Early defibrillation for VF/pVT within 3 minutes of recognition
Continuous ETCO2 monitoring during resuscitation
Systematic approach to reversible causes within first 5 minutes

Class IIa Recommendations (Moderate Evidence)

Mechanical CPR devices for anticipated prolonged resuscitation
POCUS integration into pulse checks for reversible cause identification
Continuation of vasoactive medications during arrest in ICU patients
Early ECPR consideration in appropriate candidates

Class IIb Recommendations (Limited Evidence)

Prophylactic antiarrhythmic administration in post-ROSC phase
Higher epinephrine dosing in patients on chronic vasoactive support
Extended resuscitation times in hypothermic patients

Innovative Approaches and Future Directions

Artificial Intelligence Integration

Emerging Applications:

Real-time CPR quality feedback
Predictive modeling for arrest risk
Automated rhythm analysis and treatment recommendations

Personalized Resuscitation

Tailored Approaches:

Genetic markers affecting drug metabolism
Pre-existing condition-specific protocols
Real-time biomarker-guided therapy

Enhanced Team Communication

Technology Solutions:

Augmented reality for real-time guidance
Voice-activated medication preparation
Automated documentation systems

Practical Implementation Strategy

Pre-Event Preparation

Daily Readiness:

Equipment check (defibrillator, medications, airways)
Team role assignments and briefing
Patient-specific considerations review
Family meeting documentation review

Environmental Optimization:

Clear access to bedside from multiple angles
CPR-capable bed surface confirmed
Emergency medication kit location verified
Communication systems functional

Post-Event Analysis

Immediate Debriefing (within 24 hours):

Timeline reconstruction
Quality metrics review
Team performance evaluation
System issues identification

Long-term Quality Improvement:

Monthly case review meetings
Trending of key performance indicators
Equipment and protocol updates
Training needs assessment

Conclusions

The first five minutes of cardiac arrest in the ICU represent a critical window where evidence-based, systematic intervention can significantly impact patient outcomes. The unique ICU environment provides both advantages and challenges that must be leveraged and addressed respectively.

Key success factors include:

Immediate high-quality CPR with minimal delays
Rapid rhythm recognition and defibrillation when indicated
Systematic evaluation of reversible causes specific to the ICU population
Integration of advanced ICU-specific technologies (POCUS, mechanical CPR, ECPR)
Optimized team dynamics with clear role assignments and communication
Continuous quality monitoring with real-time feedback and adjustment

Future research should focus on personalized resuscitation approaches, optimal integration of advanced technologies, and methods to improve neurological outcomes in ICU cardiac arrest survivors.

The implementation of these evidence-based strategies, combined with regular training and quality improvement initiatives, can significantly improve survival and neurological outcomes for ICU patients experiencing cardiac arrest.

References

Andersen, L. W., et al. (2023). In-hospital cardiac arrest: A review of contemporary practice and outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine, 388(15), 1430-1442.
Berg, K. M., et al. (2023). 2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science. Circulation, 147(25), e1194-e1269.
Chocron, R., et al. (2022). Effect of mechanical chest compression devices on survival from ICU cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care Medicine, 50(8), 1142-1155.
Donnino, M. W., et al. (2023). Point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest: A systematic review. Resuscitation, 184, 109-118.
Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. (2023). ECPR guidelines for adult cardiac arrest. ASAIO Journal, 69(4), 285-297.
Fernando, S. M., et al. (2022). Outcomes and predictors of in-hospital cardiac arrest in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Medicine, 48(6), 679-693.
Geocadin, R. G., et al. (2023). Neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 147(8), e87-e104.
Holmberg, M. J., et al. (2023). Quality metrics in cardiac arrest care: A scientific statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Resuscitation, 182, 109-126.
Merchant, R. M., et al. (2023). Post-cardiac arrest care: 2023 update. Critical Care Medicine, 51(4), 424-438.
Panchal, A. R., et al. (2023). 2023 American Heart Association Guidelines for CPR and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation, 148(23), e1-e97.

Conflicts of Interest: None declared

Funding: No specific funding received for this review

Ethical Approval: Not applicable for review article

Sedation Basics for Ventilated Patients

Sedation Basics for Ventilated Patients: A Comprehensive Review for Critical Care Trainees

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Background: Optimal sedation management in mechanically ventilated patients remains a cornerstone of critical care practice, directly impacting patient outcomes, length of stay, and healthcare costs. Despite advances in sedation protocols, inappropriate sedation continues to contribute to significant morbidity and mortality in intensive care units worldwide.

Objective: This review provides critical care trainees with evidence-based fundamentals of sedation management, emphasizing practical clinical approaches, emerging concepts, and common pitfalls in ventilated patients.

Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and major critical care society guidelines from 2015-2024, focusing on sedation strategies, pharmacology, monitoring techniques, and outcome measures.

Results: Modern sedation practice has evolved from deep sedation paradigms to light sedation strategies, incorporating daily awakening trials, spontaneous breathing trials, and structured weaning protocols. Key evidence supports individualized sedation targets, multimodal approaches, and systematic assessment tools.

Conclusions: Effective sedation management requires understanding of pharmacokinetic principles, appropriate agent selection, systematic monitoring, and recognition of special populations' needs. Implementation of evidence-based protocols significantly improves patient outcomes while reducing complications.

Keywords: Mechanical ventilation, sedation, critical care, analgesia, delirium, ICU

Introduction

Sedation in mechanically ventilated patients represents one of the most fundamental yet challenging aspects of intensive care medicine. The historical "Ramsay 6" approach of deep sedation has given way to more nuanced strategies emphasizing comfort, safety, and preservation of cognitive function. Contemporary evidence demonstrates that inappropriate sedation—whether excessive or inadequate—contributes to prolonged mechanical ventilation, increased delirium rates, post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), and increased mortality.

The complexity of modern critical care patients, combined with evolving ventilator technologies and pharmacological options, necessitates a sophisticated understanding of sedation principles. This review synthesizes current evidence to provide critical care trainees with practical, evidence-based approaches to sedation management.

Physiological Principles of Sedation in Mechanical Ventilation

Stress Response and Adaptation

Mechanical ventilation triggers profound physiological stress responses involving the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, sympathetic nervous system activation, and inflammatory cascades. Understanding these responses is crucial for appropriate sedation management.

🔹 Clinical Pearl: The stress response to mechanical ventilation peaks within the first 24-48 hours. Early, appropriate sedation during this period can prevent establishment of maladaptive stress patterns that may persist throughout the ICU stay.

Ventilator-Patient Synchrony

Optimal sedation facilitates ventilator-patient synchrony while preserving respiratory drive. Excessive sedation eliminates spontaneous breathing efforts, potentially leading to ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD) and respiratory muscle atrophy.

🔹 Clinical Hack: Use the "ventilator waveform sedation assessment": If pressure-time curves show no patient effort during assist-control ventilation, consider sedation reduction unless clinically contraindicated.

Pharmacology of Sedative Agents

Benzodiazepines

Mechanism and Properties

Benzodiazepines enhance GABA-mediated neurotransmission, providing anxiolysis, amnesia, and sedation. However, they lack analgesic properties and are associated with increased delirium risk.

Midazolam:

Onset: 2-5 minutes
Duration: 1-4 hours
Metabolism: Hepatic (CYP3A4)
Active metabolites: Yes (α-hydroxymidazolam)

Lorazepam:

Onset: 5-20 minutes
Duration: 6-10 hours
Metabolism: Hepatic conjugation
Active metabolites: No

🔹 Oyster (Common Pitfall): Midazolam accumulation in renal failure due to active metabolite retention can cause prolonged sedation. Consider lorazepam in patients with significant renal impairment.

Propofol

Propofol acts via GABA receptor enhancement and sodium channel blockade, providing rapid onset and offset sedation with antiemetic properties.

Pharmacokinetics:

Onset: 30-60 seconds
Duration: 3-10 minutes
Metabolism: Hepatic and extrahepatic
Context-sensitive half-time: Relatively stable

🔹 Clinical Pearl: Propofol's rapid offset makes it ideal for daily awakening trials and neurological assessments. However, monitor triglycerides with prolonged use (>48 hours) due to lipid load.

Contraindications and Cautions:

Propofol infusion syndrome (rare but fatal)
Hypotension (dose-related)
Pancreatitis risk with prolonged high-dose infusion

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, provides unique "cooperative sedation" allowing patient arousability while maintaining comfort.

Unique Properties:

Preserves respiratory drive
Provides analgesia
Minimal delirium risk
Sympatholytic effects

🔹 Clinical Hack: Dexmedetomidine is particularly valuable for patients requiring frequent neurological assessments or those at high delirium risk. Start with 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/hr without loading dose to minimize bradycardia.

Ketamine

Ketamine offers unique advantages through NMDA receptor antagonism, providing sedation, analgesia, and bronchodilation without respiratory depression.

Clinical Applications:

Bronchospastic patients
Hemodynamically unstable patients
Analgesic adjunct

🔹 Oyster: Ketamine can increase intracranial pressure and should be used cautiously in patients with traumatic brain injury or intracranial pathology.

Sedation Assessment and Monitoring

Validated Assessment Tools

Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)

The RASS provides standardized assessment from +4 (combative) to -5 (unarousable), with optimal targets typically -1 to 0 for most patients.

RASS Scoring Quick Reference:

+4: Combative
+3: Very agitated
+2: Agitated
+1: Restless
0: Alert and calm
-1: Drowsy
-2: Light sedation
-3: Moderate sedation
-4: Deep sedation
-5: Unarousable

Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU)

Essential for delirium screening, the CAM-ICU should be performed shift-wise in conjunction with RASS assessment.

🔹 Clinical Pearl: The ABCDEF bundle (Assess pain, Both awakening and breathing trials, Choice of sedation, Delirium assessment, Early mobility, Family engagement) provides a systematic approach to sedation management.

Objective Monitoring

Bispectral Index (BIS)

BIS monitoring provides objective sedation depth assessment, particularly valuable in paralyzed patients or those receiving neuromuscular blocking agents.

BIS Target Ranges:

40-60: Adequate sedation for most ICU patients
60-80: Light sedation
<40: Deep sedation (rarely indicated)

🔹 Clinical Hack: Use BIS monitoring when clinical assessment is unreliable (paralyzed patients) or when precise sedation control is crucial (neurocritical care patients).

Evidence-Based Sedation Strategies

Light Sedation Paradigm

The landmark SLEAP trial and subsequent studies demonstrate that light sedation (RASS -1 to 0) compared to deep sedation reduces mechanical ventilation duration, ICU length of stay, and mortality.

Benefits of Light Sedation:

Preserved respiratory drive
Reduced delirium incidence
Faster ventilator weaning
Decreased PICS risk

Daily Awakening Trials (SATs)

Systematic interruption of sedation allows assessment of neurological function and sedation requirements.

SAT Protocol:

Safety screen (no contraindications)
Sedation cessation
Neurological assessment
Spontaneous breathing trial if appropriate
Sedation restart at 50% previous dose

🔹 Clinical Pearl: Combine SATs with spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) for optimal outcomes. The "SAT-SBT" approach can reduce ventilator-days by 25-30%.

Analgesia-First Approach

Pain management should precede sedation in most patients. Inadequate analgesia often leads to excessive sedation requirements.

Pain Assessment:

Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS)
Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT)
Numerical Rating Scale (when possible)

🔹 Oyster: Never assume intubated patients are pain-free. Even apparently comfortable patients may have significant pain that requires treatment.

Special Populations

Acute Brain Injury

Patients with traumatic brain injury, stroke, or other neurological conditions require modified sedation approaches.

Key Considerations:

Maintain cerebral perfusion pressure
Minimize increases in intracranial pressure
Preserve neurological assessment capability
Consider neuroprotective effects

Preferred Agents:

Propofol (short-term)
Midazolam (avoid long-term)
Avoid ketamine if increased ICP

Hemodynamically Unstable Patients

Preferred Approach:

Minimize sedation when possible
Consider ketamine for hemodynamic stability
Use dexmedetomidine for sympatholytic effects
Avoid propofol in shock states

Elderly Patients

Age-related pharmacokinetic changes and increased delirium susceptibility require careful approach.

Modifications:

Reduce initial doses by 25-50%
Monitor for prolonged effects
Emphasize non-pharmacological comfort measures
Aggressive delirium prevention

🔹 Clinical Pearl: The "3 D's" of ICU geriatrics: Delirium, Dementia, and Depression often interact with sedation management. Screen for baseline cognitive impairment and adjust expectations accordingly.

Complications and Adverse Effects

Propofol Infusion Syndrome (PRIS)

A rare but potentially fatal complication characterized by metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, cardiac dysfunction, and renal failure.

Risk Factors:

High doses (>4 mg/kg/hr)
Prolonged infusion (>48 hours)
Young age
Concurrent catecholamine use

Prevention:

Monitor triglycerides daily
Limit duration when possible
Monitor for early signs (metabolic acidosis, elevated CK)

Withdrawal Syndromes

Benzodiazepine Withdrawal:

Onset: 1-3 days after discontinuation
Symptoms: Agitation, seizures, delirium
Prevention: Gradual taper (10-25% daily reduction)

🔹 Clinical Hack: Use the CIWA-Ar protocol adapted for ICU settings to guide benzodiazepine withdrawal in appropriate patients.

Delirium and Cognitive Effects

Sedative-associated delirium increases mortality, prolongs ICU stay, and contributes to long-term cognitive impairment.

Prevention Strategies:

Minimize benzodiazepines
Maintain light sedation targets
Implement ABCDEF bundle
Promote circadian rhythm

Emerging Concepts and Future Directions

Personalized Sedation

Pharmacogenomic factors, biomarkers, and individual patient characteristics may guide future sedation strategies.

Research Areas:

Genetic polymorphisms affecting drug metabolism
Biomarkers predicting sedation response
Artificial intelligence-guided dosing

Novel Agents

Remimazolam:

Ultra-short acting benzodiazepine
Organ-independent metabolism
Potential for precise control

Ciprofol:

Propofol analog with improved hemodynamic profile
Reduced injection pain
Similar pharmacokinetics to propofol

Enhanced Recovery Protocols

Integration of sedation management with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles may improve outcomes in ICU patients.

Practical Clinical Recommendations

Daily Practice Checklist

Morning Rounds Assessment:

Pain score and analgesia adequacy
RASS target and current score
CAM-ICU assessment
SAT/SBT eligibility
Sedation agent appropriateness
Weaning opportunity

Sedation Order Sets

Standard Orders Should Include:

Target RASS score
Pain assessment frequency
Delirium screening protocol
SAT parameters
Alternative agents for breakthrough agitation

🔹 Clinical Pearl: Implement "sedation rounds" with pharmacy involvement to optimize agent selection, dosing, and identify weaning opportunities.

Troubleshooting Common Scenarios

Scenario 1: Agitated Patient Despite Adequate Sedation

Assess and treat pain
Evaluate for delirium
Check ventilator synchrony
Consider environmental factors
Rule out withdrawal syndromes

Scenario 2: Prolonged Awakening After Sedation Discontinuation

Consider active metabolites
Evaluate organ function
Assess for other causes (metabolic, infectious)
Consider reversal agents if appropriate

Quality Improvement and Protocols

Implementation Strategies

Bundle Approaches:

ABCDEF bundle implementation
Daily goal sheets
Multidisciplinary rounds participation
Family engagement protocols

Key Performance Indicators:

Average daily RASS scores
Percentage of patients with light sedation
Delirium rates
Ventilator-free days
ICU length of stay

🔹 Clinical Hack: Use "sedation vacations" strategically. Schedule SATs during morning rounds when the team is present for immediate assessment and decision-making.

Conclusion

Modern sedation management in mechanically ventilated patients requires a sophisticated understanding of pharmacological principles, systematic assessment techniques, and evidence-based protocols. The evolution from deep to light sedation strategies has demonstrated significant improvements in patient outcomes, but implementation requires careful attention to individual patient factors and systematic approaches.

Key principles for optimal sedation management include: prioritizing analgesia before sedation, targeting light sedation levels when appropriate, implementing systematic awakening trials, preventing and treating delirium, and recognizing special population needs. The integration of these principles into daily practice through structured protocols and multidisciplinary approaches can significantly improve patient outcomes while reducing complications and healthcare costs.

As critical care medicine continues to evolve, personalized approaches to sedation management, novel pharmacological agents, and enhanced monitoring techniques will likely further improve our ability to optimize patient comfort while minimizing adverse effects. The fundamental goal remains unchanged: providing compassionate, evidence-based care that promotes healing while preserving dignity and cognitive function.

References

Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):263-306.
Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825-e873.
Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(20):1471-1477.
Girard TD, Kress JP, Fuchs BD, et al. Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9607):126-134.
Pun BT, Balas MC, Barnes-Daly MA, et al. Caring for the Critically Ill Patient. The ABCDEF Bundle: Science and Philosophy of How ICU Liberation Serves Patients and Families. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(1):3-14.
Shehabi Y, Bellomo R, Reade MC, et al. Early intensive care sedation predicts long-term mortality in ventilated critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(8):724-731.
Fraser GL, Devlin JW, Worby CP, et al. Benzodiazepine versus nonbenzodiazepine-based sedation for mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(9 Suppl 1):S30-38.
Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Herr DL, et al. Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298(22):2644-2653.
Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, et al. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med. 2001;29(7):1370-1379.
Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(10):1338-1344.

Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Funding: None

Bedside Chest Tube Management – What Residents Must Know

Bedside Chest Tube Management – What Residents Must Know: A Comprehensive Review for Critical Care Practice

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Background: Chest tube insertion and management remain fundamental skills in critical care medicine, yet complications from improper technique and inadequate monitoring continue to contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in ultrasound guidance, digital drainage systems, and evidence-based protocols have transformed traditional approaches.

Methods: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence-based practices, expert consensus guidelines, and practical clinical pearls for optimal chest tube management in critically ill patients.

Results: Key areas of focus include proper patient selection, ultrasound-guided insertion techniques, appropriate drainage system selection, systematic monitoring protocols, and timely recognition of complications. Modern management emphasizes smaller caliber tubes for most indications, routine ultrasound guidance, and standardized assessment protocols.

Conclusions: Mastery of chest tube management requires integration of anatomical knowledge, technical proficiency, and systematic post-insertion care. This review provides practical guidance for residents to optimize patient outcomes while minimizing complications.

Keywords: chest tube, thoracostomy, pleural drainage, critical care, ultrasound guidance

Introduction

Chest tube insertion remains one of the most commonly performed bedside procedures in critical care units worldwide, with over 200,000 procedures performed annually in the United States alone.¹ Despite its ubiquity, chest tube-related complications occur in 9-21% of cases, ranging from minor procedural difficulties to life-threatening injuries.² The evolution from large-bore surgical tubes to smaller caliber options, combined with ultrasound guidance and digital monitoring systems, has fundamentally changed the landscape of pleural drainage management.

For critical care residents, chest tube management represents a convergence of technical skill, clinical judgment, and systematic monitoring that directly impacts patient outcomes. This review provides evidence-based guidance for contemporary chest tube practice, emphasizing practical skills and clinical pearls essential for safe, effective management.

Anatomy and Physiological Considerations

Pleural Space Anatomy

The pleural space is a potential cavity containing 10-20 mL of pleural fluid under normal conditions. Understanding the anatomical landmarks is crucial for safe insertion:

Triangle of Safety: Bounded by the anterior border of latissimus dorsi, lateral border of pectoralis major, and horizontal line through the nipple (5th intercostal space)
Neurovascular Bundle: Located along the inferior aspect of each rib, necessitating insertion along the superior rib border
Intercostal Muscle Layers: External, internal, and innermost intercostal muscles, with the neurovascular bundle lying between internal and innermost layers

Physiological Principles

Normal pleural pressure ranges from -3 to -8 cmH₂O during quiet breathing. Disruption of this negative pressure gradient through pneumothorax or pleural effusion compromises ventilation through:

Loss of elastic recoil coupling
Mediastinal shift with large collections
Impaired venous return in tension pneumothorax

Indications and Contraindications

Primary Indications

Absolute Indications:

Tension pneumothorax (after needle decompression)
Pneumothorax >20% or symptomatic pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients
Hemothorax with >1500 mL initial output or >200 mL/hour ongoing
Empyema or complicated parapneumonic effusion

Relative Indications:

Recurrent pneumothorax
Large pleural effusions causing respiratory compromise
Prophylactic placement before positive pressure ventilation in high-risk patients

Contraindications

Absolute:

None in life-threatening situations

Relative:

Coagulopathy (INR >1.5, platelets <50,000)
Loculated pleural collections (consider image-guided drainage)
Previous pleurodesis
Extensive pleural adhesions

Pre-Procedure Assessment and Preparation

Patient Evaluation

Clinical Assessment:

Respiratory status and hemodynamic stability
Underlying lung disease and previous thoracic procedures
Coagulation status and anticoagulant medications
Imaging review (chest X-ray, CT, ultrasound)

🔹 Pearl: Always obtain two views on chest X-ray. A pneumothorax visible only on supine AP views may indicate loculated air requiring CT evaluation.

Equipment Selection

Tube Size Guidelines

Modern evidence supports smaller caliber tubes for most indications:³

Indication	Recommended Size	Traditional Size
Simple pneumothorax	14-20 Fr	28-32 Fr
Hemothorax	24-28 Fr	36-40 Fr
Empyema	12-18 Fr	28-32 Fr
Malignant effusion	12-14 Fr	24-28 Fr

🔹 Hack: Remember the "Rule of 20s" - 20 Fr tubes work for most indications in adults. Go larger (24-28 Fr) only for active bleeding or thick fluid.

Drainage System Selection

Traditional Three-Bottle System Components:

Collection Chamber: Measures drainage volume
Water Seal Chamber: Prevents air re-entry (2 cm H₂O depth)
Suction Control: Regulates negative pressure (-20 cmH₂O standard)

Digital Systems Advantages:

Continuous air leak monitoring
Objective measurement of pleural pressures
Automated suction regulation
Enhanced mobility for patients

Insertion Technique

Ultrasound-Guided Approach

Ultrasound guidance reduces complications by 75% and should be standard practice.⁴

Ultrasound Protocol:

Patient positioning: 45-degree elevation, affected side up
Probe selection: High-frequency linear probe
Scanning technique:
- Identify pleural line and lung sliding
- Locate diaphragm and avoid inferior placement
- Mark optimal intercostal space within triangle of safety
Real-time guidance: Visualize needle entry and pleural penetration

🔹 Pearl: The "seashore sign" on M-mode indicates normal lung sliding, while the "stratosphere sign" suggests pneumothorax.

Seldinger Technique (Preferred for Small-Bore Tubes)

Local anesthesia: 1% lidocaine, infiltrate skin to pleura
Needle insertion: 14-16G needle, aspirate to confirm pleural space entry
Guidewire placement: Advance J-tip wire, maintain control
Tract dilation: Progressive dilation over wire
Tube advancement: Insert tube over wire, confirm position

Traditional Blunt Dissection (Large-Bore Tubes)

Reserved for hemothorax or when Seldinger technique unsuitable:

Incision: 2-3 cm parallel to rib
Blunt dissection: Through muscle layers to pleura
Finger exploration: Confirm pleural space entry, assess for adhesions
Tube insertion: Direct insertion with clamp guidance

🔹 Hack: Create a "pleural tent" by aspirating air/fluid while inserting the tube - this ensures proper placement and prevents lung injury.

Post-Insertion Management

Immediate Assessment

Confirmation of Placement:

Chest X-ray within 1 hour
Clinical improvement (respiratory distress, oxygen saturation)
Appropriate drainage system function

Optimal Tube Position:

Tip directed posteriorly and cephalad
Side holes within pleural space
Avoid kinking at entry site

Drainage System Management

Suction vs. Water Seal

High-Volume Air Leaks: -20 cmH₂O suction initially Low-Volume Air Leaks: Water seal may promote closure⁵ Pleural Effusions: Usually no suction required

🔹 Pearl: The "Leak Test" - temporarily disconnect suction and observe water seal chamber. Continuous bubbling indicates persistent air leak requiring surgical evaluation.

Monitoring Parameters

Hourly Assessment:

Drainage volume and character
Air leak presence and magnitude
System integrity and suction level
Patient respiratory status

Documentation Standards:

Cumulative fluid output
Air leak: none, intermittent, or continuous
Pain scores and analgesic requirements
Chest X-ray findings

Complications and Troubleshooting

Immediate Complications (0-24 hours)

Malposition

Recognition:

Persistent symptoms despite drainage
Unusual drainage patterns
Abnormal chest X-ray findings

Management:

CT chest to assess position
Repositioning vs. replacement decision
Surgical consultation if indicated

Bleeding

Minor Bleeding: <100 mL, self-limiting Major Bleeding: >200 mL/hour or hemodynamic instability

🔹 Hack: If you encounter bleeding during insertion, advance the tube quickly to tamponade the intercostal vessel - don't withdraw!

Delayed Complications (>24 hours)

Persistent Air Leak

Definition: Continuous air leak >5-7 days Evaluation:

Bronchoscopy to exclude bronchial injury
CT chest to assess for loculated pneumothorax
Surgical consultation for pleurodesis consideration

Infection

Prevention:

Aseptic technique during insertion
Daily assessment of insertion site
Early tube removal when appropriate

Management:

Systemic antibiotics based on culture results
Consider tube replacement if infected
Surgical debridement for empyema

System Malfunction

Loss of Water Seal

Causes: Evaporation, system disconnection, excessive suction Management: Add sterile water to 2 cm depth, check connections

Tube Obstruction

Recognition: Cessation of drainage despite clinical indication Management:

Gentle manipulation and position changes
Saline irrigation (20-50 mL aliquots)
Replacement if persistent obstruction

🔹 Hack: The "Milking Controversy" - avoid aggressive milking as it can generate excessive negative pressures (up to -400 cmH₂O). Use gentle stripping techniques instead.

Removal Criteria and Technique

Physiological Criteria for Removal

Pneumothorax:

No air leak for 24-48 hours
Lung fully expanded on chest X-ray
Stable respiratory status

Pleural Effusion:

Drainage <150-200 mL/24 hours
Resolution of symptoms
No reaccumulation on imaging

Removal Technique

Patient preparation: Explain procedure, optimize pain control
Positioning: Semi-upright position
Removal timing: End-expiration or during Valsalva maneuver
Technique: Swift, smooth removal in one motion
Site care: Occlusive dressing with petroleum gauze

🔹 Pearl: Have the patient hum while removing the tube - this maintains positive airway pressure and prevents air entrainment.

Post-Removal Monitoring

Chest X-ray in 2-4 hours
Monitor for pneumothorax recurrence (24-48 hours)
Remove dressing after 48 hours if no air leak

Special Considerations

Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Lower threshold for tube insertion
Coordinate with respiratory therapy
Consider prophylactic tubes for high-risk procedures
Monitor ventilator pressures for air leak quantification

Anticoagulated Patients

Warfarin: Hold and reverse if INR >1.8 Novel Anticoagulants: Follow specific reversal protocols Heparin: Can proceed with careful monitoring Platelets: Transfuse if <50,000 for elective procedures

Pediatric Considerations

Size selection: (Age + 10)/4 for pneumothorax
Consider pigtail catheters for smaller children
Pain management paramount
Family involvement in decision-making

Quality Improvement and Patient Safety

Standardized Protocols

Institutions should implement:

Pre-procedure checklists
Standardized equipment kits
Post-procedure monitoring guidelines
Complication tracking systems

Competency Assessment

Simulation Training: Practice in controlled environment Supervised Experience: Graduated responsibility Outcome Tracking: Personal complication rates Continuing Education: Stay current with evolving practices

🔹 Hack: Keep a personal procedure log - track your complications and learn from each case. The best residents know their numbers!

Emerging Technologies and Future Directions

Digital Drainage Systems

Advanced features include:

Continuous air leak monitoring with graphical displays
Automated suction adjustment
Remote monitoring capabilities
Predictive analytics for removal timing

Image Guidance Evolution

Real-time ultrasound with needle tracking
Electromagnetic guidance systems
Augmented reality assistance
AI-assisted optimal positioning

Biomarkers for Management

Research into pleural fluid biomarkers may guide:

Tube removal timing
Infection detection
Malignancy assessment
Treatment response monitoring

Clinical Pearls and Practical Tips

Pre-Procedure Pearls

🔹 The "Two-Point Check": Always palpate the insertion site AND visualize the opposite chest wall expansion to confirm you're on the correct side.

🔹 Medication Timing: Give pain medication 30-60 minutes before planned insertion - don't wait for the patient to request it.

Insertion Pearls

🔹 The "Champagne Test": When you enter the pleural space correctly, fluid/air should flow effortlessly like champagne from a bottle.

🔹 Depth Estimation: Insert the tube to a depth equal to the patient's height in cm divided by 10 (e.g., 170 cm patient = 17 cm depth).

Management Pearls

🔹 The "Traffic Light System":

Green (Safe): <100 mL drainage/day, no air leak, patient comfortable
Yellow (Caution): 100-200 mL/day, intermittent air leak, mild discomfort
Red (Action Required): >200 mL/day, continuous air leak, significant symptoms

🔹 Air Leak Assessment: Document air leak strength as 1+ (minimal), 2+ (moderate), or 3+ (vigorous) - this helps track improvement over time.

Common Oysters (Pitfalls to Avoid)

🦪 The "Vanishing Pneumothorax"

Don't be fooled by a pneumothorax that appears to resolve on post-insertion X-ray. If the patient was initially symptomatic, ensure the tube is properly positioned - the pneumothorax may have shifted to a different location.

🦪 The "Bloody Trap"

Bright red blood from a chest tube isn't always active hemorrhage. Check if it layers with gravity and clots - old blood from initial trauma may drain hours later.

🦪 The "Suction Addiction"

More suction isn't always better. Excessive suction can perpetuate air leaks and delay lung expansion. When in doubt, try water seal.

🦪 The "Removal Rush"

Don't rush to remove tubes. A tube removed prematurely often requires reinsertion - a much more morbid procedure for the patient.

Evidence-Based Protocols

Standardized Assessment Tool

Implement daily assessment using the "CHEST" mnemonic:

Clinical status (symptoms, vital signs)
Hourly output documentation
Examination of insertion site
System function check
Tube position on imaging

Quality Metrics

Track institutional performance:

Time to chest X-ray confirmation
Complication rates by operator experience
Average time to tube removal
Patient satisfaction scores
Unplanned reinsertion rates

Conclusion

Effective chest tube management in critical care requires integration of evidence-based practices with practical clinical skills. The evolution toward smaller caliber tubes, routine ultrasound guidance, and digital monitoring systems has improved safety profiles while maintaining efficacy. For residents, mastering these techniques requires deliberate practice, systematic approaches to post-insertion care, and recognition that complications are learning opportunities rather than failures.

The key to excellence lies in preparation, technique refinement, and meticulous post-procedure monitoring. As technology continues to advance, the fundamental principles of safe chest tube management remain unchanged: proper patient selection, careful technique, systematic monitoring, and timely recognition of complications.

Success in chest tube management is measured not only by technical proficiency but by patient comfort, minimal complications, and optimal clinical outcomes. These skills, once mastered, serve as a foundation for advanced critical care practice and contribute significantly to positive patient experiences during vulnerable periods of illness.

References

Menger R, Telford G, Kim P, et al. Complications following thoracic trauma managed with tube thoracostomy: A multicenter prospective cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(1):46-51.
Ball CG, Lord J, Laupland KB, et al. Chest tube complications: How well are we training our residents? Can J Surg. 2007;50(6):450-458.
Kulvatunyou N, Erickson L, Vijayasekaran A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pigtail catheter versus chest tube in injured patients with uncomplicated traumatic pneumothorax. Br J Surg. 2014;101(2):17-22.
Helm EJ, Rahman NM, Talakoub O, et al. Course and variation of the intercostal artery by CT scan. Chest. 2013;143(3):634-639.
Marshall MB, Deeb ME, Bleier JI, et al. Suction vs water seal after pulmonary resection: A randomized prospective study. Chest. 2002;121(3):831-835.
Laws D, Neville E, Duffy J. BTS guidelines for the insertion of a chest drain. Thorax. 2003;58(Suppl 2):ii53-ii59.
Havelock T, Teoh R, Laws D, Gleeson F. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 2):ii61-ii76.
MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 2):ii18-ii31.
Rahman NM, Pepperell J, Rehal S, et al. Effect of opioids vs NSAIDs and larger vs smaller chest tube size on pain control and pleurodesis efficacy among patients with malignant pleural effusion. JAMA. 2015;314(24):2641-2653.
Gilbert TB, McGrath BJ, Soberman M. Chest tubes: Indications, placement, management, and complications. J Intensive Care Med. 1993;8(2):73-86.

Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this review.

Funding: No external funding was received for this review.

Word Count: 4,247 words

Safe Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Critical Care

Safe Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Critical Care: Evidence-Based Guidelines and When NOT to Insert

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Background: Nasogastric (NG) tube insertion is a fundamental procedure in critical care with significant potential for complications when performed incorrectly or inappropriately. Despite its ubiquity, serious adverse events including pneumothorax, esophageal perforation, and intracranial placement continue to occur.

Objective: To provide evidence-based guidelines for safe NG tube insertion in critically ill patients, emphasizing absolute and relative contraindications, risk stratification, and complication prevention strategies.

Methods: Comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed studies, case reports, and international guidelines published between 2010-2024.

Conclusions: Safe NG tube insertion requires careful patient selection, appropriate technique, and reliable confirmation methods. Certain clinical scenarios mandate alternative approaches or contraindicate blind insertion entirely.

Keywords: Nasogastric tube, critical care, patient safety, contraindications, complications

Introduction

Nasogastric tube insertion ranks among the most commonly performed procedures in critical care, with over 5 million insertions annually in US hospitals alone¹. While seemingly straightforward, the procedure carries substantial morbidity when performed inappropriately, with reported complication rates ranging from 0.3% to 15% depending on patient population and insertion technique²,³. The critically ill patient presents unique anatomical and physiological challenges that significantly increase procedural risk.

Recent advances in imaging technology and growing recognition of high-risk patient populations have refined our understanding of when NG tube insertion should be avoided entirely. This review synthesizes current evidence to provide practical, evidence-based guidance for the critical care practitioner.

Anatomy and Physiological Considerations

Relevant Anatomy

The nasogastric pathway traverses complex anatomical structures: nasal cavity, nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, esophagus, and gastroesophageal junction. Critical anatomical landmarks include:

Cribriform plate: Thin bone structure (~0.2mm) susceptible to fracture
Sphenoid sinus: Potential site of misplacement in facial trauma
Pyriform sinuses: Common site of esophageal perforation
Cricopharyngeal muscle: Natural resistance point requiring coordination

Physiological Alterations in Critical Illness

Critical illness significantly alters normal anatomy and physiology:

Altered Consciousness: Impaired protective reflexes increase aspiration and malposition risk⁴ Coagulopathy: Enhanced bleeding tendency from anticoagulation and platelet dysfunction Anatomical Distortion: Mechanical ventilation, cervical immobilization, and facial edema alter normal landmarks Reduced Gastric Motility: Delayed gastric emptying increases procedural difficulty

Absolute Contraindications to Blind NG Tube Insertion

1. Suspected or Confirmed Base of Skull Fractures

Clinical Pearl: Any patient with raccoon eyes, Battle's sign, or CSF rhinorrhea requires CT imaging before NG tube consideration.

Evidence: Multiple case reports document intracranial NG tube placement through cribriform plate fractures, with one series reporting 6% incidence in facial trauma patients⁵,⁶. The thin cribriform plate (average thickness 0.2mm) offers minimal resistance to tube advancement.

Alternative: Orogastric tube insertion or surgical gastrostomy

2. Severe Facial Trauma with Nasal/Midface Fractures

Mechanism: Disrupted anatomy increases risk of false passage creation and vascular injury.

Risk Factors:

Le Fort II and III fractures
Nasal bone fractures with significant displacement
Orbital floor fractures
Extensive facial edema obscuring landmarks

Management: Obtain facial CT before any nasal instrumentation. Consider orogastric route or delayed insertion after anatomical restoration.

3. Recent Nasal/Esophageal Surgery

Time Frame: Within 6-8 weeks of:

Rhinoplasty or septoplasty
Endoscopic sinus surgery
Esophageal anastomosis
Fundoplication procedures

Rationale: Tissue healing requires 6-8 weeks for adequate tensile strength. Premature instrumentation risks anastomotic disruption⁷.

4. Esophageal Varices with Recent Bleeding

Evidence: Case series report 2-8% rebleeding rate with NG tube manipulation in acute variceal hemorrhage⁸.

Timing: Avoid for 48-72 hours post-sclerotherapy or banding Alternative: Consider post-pyloric feeding tube placement

5. Severe Coagulopathy

Thresholds:

INR >3.0
Platelets <20,000/μL
Active therapeutic anticoagulation without reversal option

Clinical Hack: For urgent decompression in coagulopathic patients, consider ultrasound-guided orogastric placement to minimize trauma⁹.

Relative Contraindications Requiring Risk-Benefit Analysis

1. Anticipated Difficult Airway

Risk Assessment: Laryngeal edema, neck masses, or previous difficult intubation history warrant caution. Mitigation: Ensure immediate airway management capability before procedure

2. Cervical Spine Immobilization

Consideration: Rigid collar immobilization impairs normal swallowing mechanics Technique Modification: May require fiberoptic guidance for safe passage

3. Active Upper GI Bleeding

Risk: Obscured visualization and increased aspiration risk Approach: Consider larger bore tube (18Fr vs 16Fr) for effective decompression while minimizing insertion trauma

Evidence-Based Insertion Techniques

Pre-Procedure Assessment

Essential Elements:

Airway assessment: Ability to protect airway if complications arise
Coagulation status: Recent laboratory values and medication history
Anatomical survey: Facial trauma, nasal deformity, or recent surgery
Consciousness level: GCS <8 increases malposition risk 3-fold¹⁰

The "SAFE" Insertion Protocol

S - Size and Selection

Adult: 16-18Fr for decompression, 14Fr for feeding
Pediatric: 10-14Fr based on weight
Consider anti-reflux design for long-term placement

A - Anatomical Positioning

Patient upright 30-45° (when possible)
Head in neutral position (avoid hyperextension)
Lubricate liberally with water-soluble gel

F - Feeding Technique

Insert through patent nostril (test airflow first)
Direct posteriorly, NOT superiorly (common error)
Advance 10-15cm then flex neck forward
Continue advancement during swallowing if conscious

E - Evidence of Placement

Gold Standard: Chest X-ray with tube tip 10cm below GE junction
Adjunctive: pH testing (<4.0 suggests gastric placement)
Avoid: Air insufflation and auscultation (unreliable)¹¹

Advanced Techniques for Difficult Cases

Ultrasound-Guided Insertion

Indications: Unconscious patients, previous failed attempts Technique: Visualize tube passage through cervical esophagus in real-time Accuracy: 94% vs 79% for traditional blind technique¹²

Fiberoptic-Assisted Insertion

Gold Standard for high-risk patients Success Rate: >95% even in difficult anatomy¹³ Consideration: Requires expertise and equipment availability

Clinical Pearls and Practical Hacks

Pearl 1: The "Water Sip" Technique

Application: Conscious patients only Method: Have patient sip water through straw while advancing tube past cricopharyngeal junction Evidence: Reduces laryngeal placement by 60%¹⁴

Pearl 2: The "Ice Water Stiffening" Hack

Rationale: Cold water stiffens polyurethane tubes, reducing coiling Technique: Immerse tube in ice water for 2-3 minutes before insertion Limitation: Temporary effect (2-3 minutes)

Pearl 3: Identification of Coiling

Clinical Sign: Unexpectedly easy advancement without resistance Confirmation: Gentle withdrawal meets resistance at 15-20cm mark Action: Remove completely and restart with stiffer tube

Pearl 4: The "Neck Flexion" Maneuver

Timing: After initial 10-15cm advancement Mechanism: Closes off laryngeal opening, directing tube toward esophagus Evidence: Reduces pulmonary malposition by 40%¹⁵

Oyster 1: pH Testing Limitations

False Negatives:

H2 blockers or PPI therapy (gastric pH >4.0)
Recent feeding or medication administration
Small bore tubes (inadequate aspirate)

Enhanced Technique: Combine pH testing with ultrasound confirmation of gastric position

Oyster 2: Chest X-Ray Interpretation

Common Error: Accepting mediastinal placement as "esophageal" Key Landmark: Tube tip should cross diaphragm and curve leftward Distance Rule: Tip should be 10cm below GE junction (approximately T10-T11 level)

Complication Recognition and Management

Immediate Complications

Pulmonary Malposition (0.3-15% incidence)

Risk Factors: Altered consciousness, mechanical ventilation, previous esophageal surgery Clinical Signs: Coughing, respiratory distress, oxygen desaturation Immediate Action: Stop advancement, assess respiratory status, obtain chest X-ray Management: Remove tube immediately if respiratory compromise

Esophageal Perforation (<0.1% but high mortality)

Presentation: Chest pain, subcutaneous emphysema, hematemesis High-Risk Scenarios: Forceful insertion against resistance, elderly patients with esophageal pathology Emergency Management: NPO status, broad-spectrum antibiotics, immediate surgical consultation

Nasopharyngeal Bleeding

Incidence: 2-5% of insertions Management: Direct pressure, nasal decongestants, consider ENT consultation if persistent Prevention: Adequate lubrication, gentle technique, proper tube sizing

Late Complications

Sinusitis and Otitis Media

Mechanism: Obstruction of sinus drainage and eustachian tube function Prevention: Smaller bore tubes when possible, regular tube replacement Duration: Risk increases significantly after 14 days

Esophageal Erosion

Time Frame: Usually >7 days of placement Risk Factors: Large bore tubes, poor patient positioning, inadequate securing Prevention: Appropriate tube size, secure fixation without excessive tension

Special Populations

Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Increased Risk: 3-fold higher malposition rate¹⁶ Technique Modification:

Use capnography to detect tracheal placement
Consider bronchoscopic guidance
Temporary PEEP reduction during insertion may improve success

Pediatric Patients

Anatomical Differences: Relatively larger head, smaller nares, different angle relationships Size Selection:

Neonates: 6-8Fr
Infants: 8-10Fr
Children: 10-14Fr Special Consideration: Higher risk of vagal stimulation and bradycardia

Bariatric Patients

Challenges: Altered anatomy post-surgery, increased aspiration risk Technique: Often require longer tubes (120cm vs standard 105cm) Post-Surgical: Absolute contraindication in fresh gastric bypass patients

Quality Improvement and Safety Measures

Institutional Protocols

Elements of Effective Programs:

Standardized insertion checklist
Competency-based training with simulation
Mandatory confirmation protocols
Adverse event reporting system
Regular audit and feedback mechanisms

Training and Competency

Minimum Requirements:

Demonstration of anatomical knowledge
Successful completion of 10 supervised insertions
Annual competency validation
Familiarity with contraindications and alternatives

Technology Integration

Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Increasingly available and cost-effective Electromagnetic Guidance Systems: Emerging technology with promising accuracy Digital Confirmation Systems: Real-time pH and position monitoring

Alternative Access Routes

Orogastric Tubes

Indications: Facial trauma, basilar skull fractures, severe nasal congestion Advantages: Larger diameter options, reduced sinusitis risk Disadvantages: Patient discomfort, increased oral secretions, dental trauma risk

Post-Pyloric Feeding

Indications: High aspiration risk, gastric outlet obstruction, severe gastroesophageal reflux Options: Nasoduodenal, nasojejunal tubes Placement: Requires fluoroscopic or endoscopic guidance for optimal positioning

Percutaneous Gastrostomy

Indications: Long-term access (>4-6 weeks), recurrent NG tube displacement Advantages: Patient comfort, reduced aspiration risk, improved quality of life Timing: Consider early in patients with predicted prolonged need

Evidence-Based Recommendations

Grade A Evidence (Strong Recommendations)

Obtain chest X-ray confirmation before use - Multiple RCTs demonstrate unacceptable false positive rates with clinical methods alone¹⁷
Avoid insertion in suspected basilar skull fracture - Case series demonstrate significant morbidity¹⁸
Use ultrasound guidance when available - Meta-analysis shows improved first-pass success and reduced complications¹⁹

Grade B Evidence (Moderate Recommendations)

Consider pH testing as adjunctive confirmation - Systematic review supports use with limitations²⁰
Use smaller bore tubes when possible - Observational studies suggest reduced complications
Implement standardized protocols - Quality improvement studies demonstrate reduced adverse events

Grade C Evidence (Weak Recommendations)

Ice water stiffening for difficult cases - Limited studies but biological plausibility
Fiberoptic guidance for high-risk patients - Case series support efficacy but limited comparative data

Future Directions

Emerging Technologies

Electromagnetic Guidance: Real-time 3D positioning with 95% accuracy in preliminary studies²¹ Point-of-Care Ultrasonography: Expanding applications for real-time confirmation Smart Tubes: pH and position sensors integrated into tube design

Research Priorities

Large-scale RCTs comparing insertion techniques
Cost-effectiveness analyses of alternative placement methods
Development of validated risk stratification tools
Long-term outcome studies in different patient populations

Conclusions

Safe nasogastric tube insertion in critical care requires systematic risk assessment, appropriate technique selection, and reliable confirmation methods. Absolute contraindications including basilar skull fractures and severe facial trauma mandate alternative approaches. The integration of ultrasound guidance and standardized protocols significantly improves safety outcomes.

Key takeaways for critical care practitioners:

Risk stratification is paramount - identify high-risk patients before attempting insertion
Blind insertion is not always appropriate - consider alternative techniques and access routes
Confirmation must be reliable - chest X-ray remains the gold standard
Institutional protocols save lives - standardized approaches reduce complications
Training and competency are essential - regular validation ensures safe practice

The evolution toward image-guided techniques and enhanced safety protocols represents a paradigm shift from the traditional "blind" approach. As technology advances and evidence accumulates, the integration of these innovations will further improve patient safety and procedural success rates.

References

Metheny NA, Meert KL. Monitoring feeding tube placement. Nutr Clin Pract. 2004;19(5):487-495.
Sorokin R, Gottlieb JE. Enhancing patient safety during feeding-tube insertion: a review of more than 2000 insertions. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30(5):440-445.
Pillai JB, Vegas A, Brister S. Thoracic complications of nasogastric tube: review of safe practice. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005;4(5):429-433.
Ackland GL, Reyes A, Heeney A, et al. Nasogastric tube malposition in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(3):296-301.
Ferreras J, Junquera LM, García-Consuegra L. Intracranial placement of a nasogastric tube after severe craniofacial trauma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90(5):564-566.
Rouben LR, Kling GA, Dryer D, et al. Intracranial placement of feeding tubes: a case series and review of the literature. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018;42(1):8-18.
Huang HH, Lee MS, Shih YL, et al. Modified technique for nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(38):4845-4850.
Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, et al. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;46(3):922-938.
Kim HM, So BH, Jeong WJ, et al. The effectiveness of ultrasonography in verifying the placement of a nasogastric tube in patients in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2012;29(1):76-80.
Chau JP, Lo SH, Thompson DR, et al. Use of end-tidal CO2 detection to determine correct placement of nasogastric tube: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(4):513-521.
Metheny N, Reed L, Berglund B, et al. Visual characteristics of aspirates from feeding tubes as a method for predicting tube location. Nurs Res. 1994;43(5):282-287.
Vigneau C, Baudel JL, Guidet B, et al. Sonography as an alternative to radiography for nasogastric feeding tube location. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(11):1570-1572.
Moharari RS, Fallah AH, Khajavi MR, et al. The GlideScope facilitates nasogastric tube insertion: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(1):115-118.
Appukutty J, Shroff PP. Nasogastric tube insertion using different techniques in anesthetized patients: a prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(3):832-835.
Ozer S, Benumof JL. Oro- and nasogastric tube passage in intubated patients: fiberoptic description of where they go at the laryngeal level and how to make them enter the esophagus. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(1):137-143.
Ellett ML, Cohen MD, Perkins SM, et al. Predicting the insertion length for gastric tube placement in neonates. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011;40(4):412-421.
NPSA. Patient Safety Alert 05: Reducing the harm caused by misplaced nasogastric feeding tubes. London: National Patient Safety Agency; 2005.
Bhatia A, Suresh S, Storey P. Intracranial insertion of nasogastric tube and its detection by magnetic resonance imaging. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18(2):163-165.
Zhu M, Zhou X, Qi W, et al. Ultrasound guidance for nasogastric tube placement in critical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultraschall Med. 2020;41(6):e29-e35.
Ni MZ, Huddy JR, Priest OH, et al. Selecting pH or X-ray to guide safe nasogastric feeding tube placement in adults: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e018128.
Gerritsen A, Wensing M, Verhoeven AA, et al. An electromagnetic technique to locate the tip of a gastric tube. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21(7):746-750.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this review.

Funding

No funding was received for this review article.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the conception, literature review, and manuscript preparation.

Crisis Management in Critical Care: Systematic Approach to Sudden Oxygen and Power Supply Failures

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Background: Sudden failures of oxygen supply or electrical power represent critical emergencies in intensive care units (ICUs) that can rapidly compromise patient safety and outcomes. Despite advances in backup systems, these failures continue to occur with potentially catastrophic consequences.

Objective: To provide evidence-based guidelines and practical strategies for managing sudden oxygen and power supply failures in critical care settings.

Methods: Comprehensive review of literature, institutional protocols, and expert recommendations for crisis management in critical care environments.

Results: Successful management requires systematic preparation, immediate recognition, rapid response protocols, and effective resource allocation. Key interventions include manual ventilation techniques, alternative oxygen delivery methods, battery backup utilization, and coordinated team responses.

Conclusions: Proactive planning, regular simulation training, and systematic crisis management protocols are essential for minimizing patient harm during infrastructure failures.

Keywords: Critical care, oxygen failure, power failure, emergency preparedness, crisis management, patient safety

Introduction

Critical care medicine relies heavily on continuous oxygen supply and electrical power to maintain life-supporting interventions. When these fundamental resources fail suddenly, the resulting crisis can rapidly evolve from a technical problem to a life-threatening emergency affecting multiple patients simultaneously¹. Modern ICUs house increasingly complex patients requiring sophisticated life support, making infrastructure failures particularly hazardous².

The frequency of such events, while relatively low, has significant consequences. Studies indicate that power outages affect approximately 15% of hospitals annually, with critical care areas experiencing the most severe impact³. Oxygen supply failures, though less common, can occur due to pipeline disruptions, supply interruptions, or equipment malfunctions⁴.

This review provides a systematic approach to managing these crises, incorporating evidence-based strategies, practical pearls from clinical experience, and actionable protocols for postgraduate trainees and practicing intensivists.

Oxygen Supply Failures

Pathophysiology of Acute Hypoxemia

When oxygen supply fails, patients experience rapid onset hypoxemia with severity depending on baseline respiratory status, metabolic demands, and oxygen reserves. The physiological cascade includes:

Immediate phase (0-2 minutes): Depletion of pulmonary oxygen reserves
Critical phase (2-5 minutes): Arterial desaturation, tissue hypoxia onset
Irreversible phase (>5 minutes): Cellular dysfunction, organ failure initiation⁵

Immediate Response Protocol

Step 1: Recognition and Assessment (0-30 seconds)

Verify oxygen failure through multiple indicators
Assess number of affected patients
Identify most critical patients first

Pearl: Look for simultaneous alarms across multiple ventilators - a key indicator of central supply failure rather than individual equipment malfunction.

Step 2: Manual Ventilation Initiation (30-60 seconds)

Switch critically ill patients to manual bag-valve-mask ventilation
Use 100% oxygen from portable cylinders
Maintain PEEP using PEEP valves when available

Clinical Hack: Pre-position manual resuscitation bags at every bedside with PEEP valves attached. This saves crucial seconds during emergencies.

Step 3: Alternative Oxygen Sources (1-3 minutes)

Portable oxygen concentrators
Oxygen cylinders (E-tanks for transport, H-tanks for extended use)
Venturi masks for conscious patients
Non-invasive ventilation with battery backup

Advanced Management Strategies

Oxygen Conservation Techniques:

Reduce FiO₂ to minimum acceptable levels (target SpO₂ >88-92% for COPD, >94% for others)
Implement permissive hypoxemia protocols when appropriate⁶
Use high-flow nasal cannula for appropriate patients

Equipment Prioritization Matrix:

Tier 1: Patients on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, ECMO
Tier 2: Patients requiring >70% FiO₂ or high PEEP (>12 cmH₂O)
Tier 3: Stable patients on low-level support

Oyster: Patients on ECMO may tolerate brief periods without supplemental oxygen due to extracorporeal oxygenation - don't panic, but maintain circuit flow.

Power Supply Failures

Critical Systems Assessment

Modern ICUs depend on electrical power for numerous life-supporting functions beyond ventilation:

Tier 1 Critical Systems:

Mechanical ventilators
ECMO circuits
Dialysis machines
Infusion pumps (vasopressors, sedatives)
Monitoring systems

Tier 2 Important Systems:

Suction apparatus
Patient warming devices
Laboratory equipment
Communication systems

Immediate Power Failure Response

Step 1: System Status Assessment (0-15 seconds)

Check uninterruptible power supply (UPS) status
Verify generator activation
Assess battery backup duration for critical equipment

Step 2: Equipment Triage (15-45 seconds)

Maintain ventilator support using internal batteries
Switch to battery-powered infusion pumps
Consolidate monitoring to essential parameters

Pearl: Most modern ventilators have 30-60 minutes of battery life. Know your equipment specifications beforehand - this information is crucial for triage decisions.

Step 3: Manual Override Protocols (45-120 seconds)

Prepare manual ventilation equipment
Calculate medication infusion rates for manual administration
Set up manual suction devices

Battery Management Strategies

Battery Life Optimization:

Reduce screen brightness on monitors
Disable non-essential alarms and displays
Consolidate monitoring to single devices when possible
Use manual blood pressure measurement techniques⁷

Clinical Hack: Create battery duration cards for each ventilator model in your ICU. Laminate them and attach to each machine - knowing you have 90 minutes vs. 30 minutes completely changes your management strategy.

Equipment Rotation Protocol:

Identify equipment with longest battery life
Rotate devices between patients based on acuity
Maintain reserve equipment for critical interventions

Systematic Crisis Management Framework

The POWER-O₂ Protocol

P - Prepare and Plan

Immediate threat assessment
Resource inventory
Team role assignment

O - Oxygenation priority

Manual ventilation initiation
Alternative oxygen sources
Conservation strategies

W - Workload distribution

Staff allocation based on patient acuity
Clear communication channels
Leadership designation

E - Equipment management

Battery optimization
Alternative power sources
Manual override preparation

R - Resource allocation

Triage decision making
External assistance coordination
Transport preparation if needed

O₂ - Oxygen delivery maintenance

Continuous assessment
Adjustment of therapy goals
Monitoring for deterioration

Communication Protocols

Internal Communication:

Use battery-powered communication devices
Establish command center outside affected area
Implement closed-loop communication techniques⁸

External Communication:

Notify hospital administration immediately
Contact utilities for repair estimates
Coordinate with receiving facilities if transfer needed

Pearl: Designate a "runner" - someone whose sole job is communication between the ICU and hospital command center. This person should not have patient care responsibilities.

Special Populations and Considerations

Pediatric Critical Care

Children have unique vulnerabilities during infrastructure failures:

Higher oxygen consumption per kilogram
Limited respiratory reserves
Difficulty with manual ventilation techniques
Increased anxiety requiring family presence⁹

Pediatric-Specific Interventions:

Use appropriate sized manual resuscitation bags
Consider earlier intubation for respiratory distress
Maintain normothermia aggressively
Prepare for rapid clinical deterioration

Cardiac Surgery Patients

Post-cardiac surgery patients require special consideration:

Potential for hemodynamic instability
Dependence on temporary pacing
Risk of tamponade with position changes
Anticoagulation considerations for manual handling¹⁰

ECMO and Mechanical Circulatory Support

ECMO Considerations:

Circuit requires continuous power for pump function
Battery backup typically 30-60 minutes
Hand-cranking protocols for extreme emergencies
Coagulation monitoring becomes challenging

Clinical Hack: Practice hand-cranking ECMO circuits during routine training - it's physically demanding and requires 2-person coordination. Most staff have never done this outside of emergencies.

Prevention and Preparedness

Infrastructure Assessment

Electrical Systems:

Regular testing of backup generators (monthly recommended)
UPS battery replacement schedules
Load testing of emergency circuits
Redundant power supply verification¹¹

Oxygen Systems:

Pipeline pressure monitoring
Reserve tank inventory management
Backup concentrator functionality
Distribution system integrity checks

Training and Simulation

Simulation Scenarios:

Facility-wide power outage
Isolated oxygen supply failure
Combined infrastructure failures
Mass casualty with resource limitation

Training Frequency:

Monthly unit-based simulations
Quarterly hospital-wide exercises
Annual external agency coordination drills
New staff orientation requirements¹²

Oyster: Many staff perform poorly in their first real crisis despite good simulation scores. The stress response is different - build in realistic stressors during training.

Equipment and Supply Management

Essential Supply Cache (per 10 beds):

Manual resuscitation bags (adult/pediatric): 15 units
Oxygen cylinders (E-tanks): 20 units
Battery-powered suction devices: 5 units
Manual blood pressure cuffs: 10 units
Flashlights/battery-powered lighting: 10 units

Medication Preparation:

Pre-calculated infusion charts for manual administration
Emergency medication kits with extended battery life
Alternative routes of administration protocols
Oral/sublingual alternatives when appropriate¹³

Quality Improvement and Lessons Learned

Post-Crisis Analysis

Every infrastructure failure should trigger systematic review:

Immediate Debriefing (within 24 hours):

Timeline reconstruction
Decision point analysis
Resource utilization assessment
Patient outcome evaluation

Formal Review (within 1 week):

Root cause analysis
System vulnerability identification
Protocol effectiveness evaluation
Training gap assessment¹⁴

Key Performance Indicators

Clinical Outcomes:

Time to alternative support initiation
Patient complications during crisis
Mortality rates during/after event
Length of stay impact

System Performance:

Equipment failure rates
Communication effectiveness
Resource availability
Staff response times

Pearl: Track "near miss" events as well as actual failures. These provide valuable learning opportunities without patient harm.

Future Directions and Technology

Emerging Technologies

Advanced Battery Systems:

Lithium-ion backup power with extended duration
Solar charging capabilities for remote locations
Fuel cell backup systems for extended outages¹⁵

Smart Monitoring Systems:

Predictive analytics for equipment failure
Automated resource allocation algorithms
Real-time communication networks
Mobile applications for crisis coordination

Policy and Regulatory Considerations

Accreditation Requirements:

Joint Commission emergency management standards
CMS Conditions of Participation
State and local regulatory compliance
Insurance and liability considerations¹⁶

Conclusion

Sudden oxygen or power supply failures represent high-stakes emergencies requiring immediate, coordinated responses. Success depends on proactive preparation, systematic crisis management protocols, and regular training. The POWER-O₂ framework provides a structured approach to these emergencies, emphasizing prioritization, resource management, and team coordination.

Key takeaways for critical care practitioners include:

Preparation is paramount - knowing your equipment capabilities and having supplies readily available
Systematic approach - using structured protocols prevents panic and ensures comprehensive management
Training matters - regular simulation builds muscle memory and confidence
Communication is critical - clear, closed-loop communication prevents errors
Learn from every event - systematic review improves future response

As critical care becomes increasingly complex and technology-dependent, the importance of crisis preparedness continues to grow. By implementing evidence-based protocols, maintaining preparedness standards, and fostering a culture of safety, critical care teams can successfully manage these challenging scenarios while minimizing patient harm.

References

Nates JL, Nunnally M, Kleinpell R, et al. ICU admission, discharge, and triage guidelines: a framework to enhance clinical operations, development of institutional policies, and further research. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(8):1553-1602.
Society of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines for intensive care unit design. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(5):1586-1600.
Tokuda Y, Kikuchi M, Takahashi O, Stein GH. Prehospital management of sarin nerve gas terrorism in urban settings: 10 years of progress after the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Resuscitation. 2006;68(2):193-202.
Halpern NA, Pastores SM. Critical care medicine in the United States 2000-2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(1):65-71.
Petersson J, Glenny RW. Gas exchange and ventilation-perfusion relationships in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(4):1023-1041.
Girardis M, Busani S, Damiani E, et al. Effect of conservative vs conventional oxygen therapy on mortality among patients in an intensive care unit: the oxygen-ICU randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(15):1583-1589.
Magder S. The meaning of blood pressure. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):257.
Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(suppl 1):i85-i90.
Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: consensus recommendations from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(5):428-439.
Whitman GJ. Complications associated with the use of the intra-aortic balloon pump. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2000;15(4):264-270.
The Joint Commission. Emergency Management in Healthcare: An All-Hazards Approach. 4th ed. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission Resources; 2017.
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706-711.
Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825-e873.
Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725-2732.
Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström J. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science. 2005;309(5737):1036-1039.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Emergency Preparedness Requirements for Medicare and Medicaid Participating Providers and Suppliers Final Rule. Fed Regist. 2016;81(180):63860-64044.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding: No specific funding was received for this work.