Lines and Tubes in the ICU

 

Lines and Tubes in the ICU: A Comprehensive Review for Critical Care Practice

Dr Neeraj Manikath, Claude.ai

Abstract

Intensive care management relies heavily on various invasive devices for monitoring, medication administration, and life support. This review provides a comprehensive overview of common lines and tubes used in critical care settings, focusing on their indications, insertion techniques, complications, and evidence-based management strategies. Understanding the nuances of these devices is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes while minimizing iatrogenic complications. This article presents current best practices for the selection, placement, maintenance, and troubleshooting of central venous catheters, arterial lines, pulmonary artery catheters, endotracheal tubes, chest tubes, and various drainage systems commonly employed in intensive care units.

Keywords: Vascular access, Central venous catheters, Arterial lines, Pulmonary artery catheters, Endotracheal tubes, Chest tubes, Nasogastric tubes, Urinary catheters, Complications, Critical care

Introduction

Modern intensive care medicine relies extensively on invasive monitoring and therapeutic devices. These "lines and tubes" serve as lifelines for critically ill patients but simultaneously represent potential sources of complications if not properly managed. Recent studies indicate that device-related complications contribute significantly to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide (Vincent et al., 2020). A thorough understanding of these devices is therefore essential for critical care specialists.

This review provides an evidence-based approach to the selection, insertion, maintenance, and troubleshooting of commonly used critical care devices. We emphasize recent advances in technology, evolving best practices, and strategies to minimize complications while maximizing therapeutic benefits.

Vascular Access Devices

Central Venous Catheters (CVCs)

Central venous catheters are indispensable in critical care for fluid resuscitation, medication administration, hemodynamic monitoring, and as access for renal replacement therapies.

Types and Selection

Non-tunneled CVCs remain the most commonly used in acute settings, with typical insertion sites including the internal jugular, subclavian, and femoral veins. Each site offers distinct advantages and potential complications (Table 1).

Tunneled CVCs (e.g., Hickman, Broviac) traverse a subcutaneous tract before entering the vein, reducing infection risk and providing longer-term access.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) offer the advantage of insertion without proximity to central structures, though with higher thrombosis rates compared to centrally inserted lines (Chopra et al., 2015).

Implantable ports consist of a subcutaneous reservoir accessed via needle puncture, primarily used for intermittent therapy rather than critical care.

Insertion Techniques

Ultrasound guidance has become the standard of care for CVC insertion, with multiple studies demonstrating reduced mechanical complications and higher first-pass success rates (Lamperti et al., 2012). A meta-analysis by Wu et al. (2018) showed that ultrasound-guided CVC placement reduced complications by 71% compared to landmark techniques.

The Seldinger technique remains the standard approach, involving:

1. Identification of the target vessel
2. Vessel puncture with a finder needle
3. Guidewire insertion
4. Tract dilation
5. Catheter advancement over the guidewire

Modern modifications include micro-puncture sets, which utilize smaller introducer needles to minimize complications during the initial puncture phase.

Complications and Management

Mechanical complications include arterial puncture, pneumothorax, hemothorax, air embolism, and catheter malposition. Real-time ultrasound has significantly reduced these risks, while post-procedural chest radiography remains standard practice to confirm proper positioning.

Infectious complications remain a significant concern, with catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) affecting approximately 5 per 1,000 catheter-days (Bell & O'Grady, 2017). Prevention bundles have proven effective, including:

• Maximal barrier precautions during insertion
• Chlorhexidine skin antisepsis
• Optimal catheter site selection
• Daily review of catheter necessity
• Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters in high-risk settings

Thrombotic complications occur in 2-26% of patients with CVCs, with higher rates associated with PICCs, multiple insertion attempts, and certain patient factors (cancer, thrombophilia). Heparin-bonded catheters and proper positioning of catheter tips at the cavoatrial junction may reduce thrombosis risk (Geerts, 2014).

Arterial Catheters

Arterial lines permit continuous blood pressure monitoring and facilitate frequent blood sampling. The radial artery remains the preferred site due to collateral circulation via the ulnar artery, though femoral and brachial sites are alternatives in specific scenarios.

Insertion Techniques

Ultrasound guidance has been shown to increase first-attempt success rates and reduce complications compared to palpation techniques, particularly in patients with hemodynamic instability or obesity (Bhattacharjee et al., 2018). The modified Allen test, once standard practice before radial arterial cannulation, has fallen out of favor due to poor predictive value for ischemic complications.

Complications and Management

Despite frequent concerns, ischemic complications from arterial catheters are rare (≤0.1%). More common complications include:

• Temporary occlusion (5-25%)
• Hematoma (14-26%)
• Infection (0.4-0.7%)
• Pseudoaneurysm formation (rare)

Current evidence suggests that arterial catheters can safely remain in place for 7-10 days without scheduled replacement, provided there are no signs of infection or dysfunction (O'Horo et al., 2014).

Pulmonary Artery Catheters (PACs)

While utilization has declined with the advent of less invasive monitoring, PACs remain valuable in specific scenarios such as complex cardiac surgery, refractory heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension.

Clinical Utility

PACs provide direct measurements of:

• Central venous pressure (CVP)
• Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP)
• Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP)
• Cardiac output (via thermodilution)
• Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO₂)

These measurements enable calculation of derived parameters including systemic/pulmonary vascular resistance and oxygen delivery/consumption.

Indications and Evidence

The evidence for routine PAC use in critical illness remains controversial. The ESCAPE trial found no benefit in advanced heart failure patients, while the PAC-Man study showed no difference in outcomes for general ICU patients (Shah et al., 2005; Harvey et al., 2005). However, targeted use in specific populations continues to be supported by expert consensus.

Current recommendations support PAC use for:

• Diagnosis and management of pulmonary hypertension
• Differentiation of cardiac vs. non-cardiac pulmonary edema when echocardiography is inconclusive
• Management of complex shock states with concurrent cardiopulmonary pathologies
• Guiding perioperative management in high-risk cardiac surgery

Complications

Complications include those of central venous access plus:

• Arrhythmias during insertion (4.7-68.9%)
• Pulmonary artery rupture (0.03-0.2%)
• Pulmonary infarction (0.1-5%)
• Catheter knotting (rare)
• Valvular damage (rare)

Respiratory Support Devices

Endotracheal Tubes (ETTs)

Endotracheal intubation remains the gold standard for securing the airway in critically ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.

Types and Selection

Modern ETTs feature high-volume, low-pressure cuffs to minimize tracheal mucosal injury. Size selection typically ranges from 7.0-8.0 mm internal diameter for adult females and 8.0-9.0 mm for adult males. Specialized ETTs include:

• Double-lumen tubes for independent lung ventilation and thoracic surgery
• Armored (reinforced) tubes for procedures requiring extreme neck positioning
• Subglottic suction tubes for continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions, shown to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) by 45% in meta-analyses (Caroff et al., 2016)

Optimal Positioning and Confirmation

Correct positioning is typically 3-5 cm above the carina, or at 21-23 cm at the incisors in average adults. Position confirmation requires:

1. End-tidal CO₂ detection (the gold standard)
2. Chest radiography for depth verification
3. Auscultation (though less reliable as a standalone method)

Complications and Management

Short-term complications include:

• Difficult intubation trauma
• Malposition (esophageal, endobronchial)
• Aspiration risk

Intermediate complications include:

• Tube displacement or obstruction
• Pressure injuries to lips, tongue, and pharynx
• Sinusitis (particularly with nasotracheal intubation)

Long-term complications include:

• Laryngeal injury and vocal cord dysfunction
• Tracheal stenosis (2-16% incidence)
• Tracheomalacia
• Tracheoesophageal fistula

Prevention strategies include:

• Maintaining cuff pressures between 20-30 cmH₂O
• Using appropriate sedation to prevent self-extubation
• Early consideration of tracheostomy for prolonged intubation
• Regular oral care protocols to reduce VAP risk

Tracheostomy Tubes

Tracheostomies are increasingly performed in ICU patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation, with potential benefits including improved comfort, reduced sedation requirements, enhanced mobility, and facilitated weaning.

Timing and Evidence

The optimal timing of tracheostomy remains controversial. The TracMan trial showed no mortality benefit for early (<10 days) versus late tracheostomy, though subsequent studies suggest potential benefits in subpopulations (Young et al., 2013). Current practice favors consideration after 7-10 days when prolonged ventilation is anticipated.

Types and Selection

Cuffed, non-fenestrated tubes are standard for patients requiring ongoing ventilatory support.

Fenestrated tubes facilitate speech and weaning but increase aspiration risk.

Adjustable flange tubes accommodate patients with abnormal anatomy or obesity.

Speaking valves (Passy-Muir) redirect air through the vocal cords during expiration, enabling phonation while maintaining a secured airway.

Complications and Management

Early complications include:

• Bleeding (3-36%)
• Pneumothorax (0-4%)
• Subcutaneous emphysema (1.4%)
• Tube displacement (1.5%)

Late complications include:

• Tracheal stenosis (0.6-21%)
• Granulation tissue formation (3.8%)
• Tracheoinnominate artery fistula (rare but often fatal)
• Tracheoesophageal fistula (0.1-1%)

Management principles include:

• First tube change typically after 7 days when tract is mature
• Regular cuff pressure monitoring
• Routine inner cannula cleaning for non-disposable systems
• Structured decannulation protocols when appropriate

Chest Tubes

Chest tubes (thoracostomy tubes) are essential for draining air, blood, or fluid from the pleural space.

Types and Indications

Traditional sizing categorized chest tubes as:

• Small (10-14 Fr): Primarily for pneumothorax
• Medium (16-24 Fr): For complicated pneumothorax or small effusions
• Large (28-40 Fr): For hemothorax or empyema

However, evidence increasingly supports the use of smaller tubes (≤14 Fr) even for complicated conditions, with comparable efficacy and less discomfort (Rahman et al., 2015).

Insertion Techniques

The safe triangle approach (bordered by the anterior border of latissimus dorsi, lateral border of pectoralis major, and line above the horizontal level of the nipple) remains standard for most insertions. Modern approaches emphasize:

• Ultrasound guidance to identify optimal insertion site
• Blunt dissection technique to minimize lung injury
• Trocar-free insertion methods

Drainage Systems and Management

Modern drainage systems typically feature a three-chamber system:

1. Collection chamber
2. Water seal chamber (preventing air backflow)
3. Suction control chamber

Digital drainage systems now offer objective air leak quantification and more precise control of negative pressure. These systems have been associated with shorter chest tube duration and hospitalization in thoracic surgery patients (Pompili et al., 2014).

Complications and Management

Insertional complications include:

• Intercostal vessel or nerve injury
• Lung parenchymal injury
• Misplacement (intraabdominal, intrafissural)
• Infection

Functional complications include:

• Tube obstruction
• Dislodgement
• Persistent air leak
• Re-expansion pulmonary edema (with rapid evacuation of large effusions)

Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Devices

Nasogastric and Orogastric Tubes

These tubes serve multiple purposes in critical care, including gastric decompression, enteral nutrition, and medication administration.

Types and Selection

Salem sump tubes (dual-lumen) are preferred for gastric decompression, as the air vent reduces mucosal injury from suction.

Small-bore feeding tubes (8-12 Fr) reduce discomfort and rhinopharyngeal trauma but may be insufficient for gastric decompression.

Post-pyloric tubes (placed beyond the pylorus) may reduce aspiration risk in select high-risk patients, though the evidence for routine use is mixed (Wang et al., 2018).

Optimal Positioning and Confirmation

Traditional methods of confirming placement (auscultation, aspirate appearance) have proven unreliable. Current standards recommend:

• pH testing of aspirate (<5.5 suggests gastric placement)
• Radiographic confirmation before initial use
• Capnography/colorimetric CO₂ detection to exclude respiratory placement

Complications and Management

Common complications include:

• Malposition (pulmonary, intracranial in patients with basilar skull fractures)
• Mucosal erosion or necrosis
• Sinusitis (with prolonged placement)
• Tube dislodgement or obstruction

Best practice management includes:

• Regular assessment of continued necessity
• Proper fixation to prevent dislodgement
• Regular irrigation to maintain patency
• Implementation of aspiration prevention protocols

Urinary Catheters

Urinary catheters are among the most common devices in ICU patients, facilitating output monitoring, management of urinary retention, and wound protection in incontinent patients.

Types and Selection

Foley catheters (indwelling urethral catheters with inflatable balloons) remain standard but are associated with the highest infection risk.

Intermittent catheters may reduce infection risk for patients requiring bladder drainage but not continuous monitoring.

Condom catheters in appropriate male patients have shown lower infection rates compared to indwelling catheters.

Suprapubic catheters may be preferred for long-term use or in patients with urethral contraindications.

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs)

CAUTIs remain among the most common healthcare-associated infections. Prevention bundles include:

• Daily necessity assessment with prompt removal when no longer indicated
• Aseptic insertion technique
• Closed drainage systems
• Proper maintenance (securing catheter, keeping collection bag below bladder level)
• Silver alloy or antibiotic-impregnated catheters in high-risk patients

Implementation of these bundles has demonstrated 50-60% reductions in CAUTI rates in multiple studies (Saint et al., 2016).

Advanced Monitoring and Support Devices

Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring

ICP monitoring is integral to managing traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and other neurocritical conditions.

Types and Selection

External ventricular drains (EVDs) represent the gold standard, offering both monitoring and therapeutic CSF drainage. However, they carry the highest infection risk (approximately 8-10%).

Intraparenchymal monitors provide continuous ICP data without CSF drainage capability but with lower infection rates (<2%).

Subdural bolts are simpler to place but may be less accurate and do not allow drainage.

Complications and Management

Key complications include:

• Infection (ventriculitis, meningitis)
• Hemorrhage during placement (0.5-2%)
• Malfunction or drift in measurement accuracy over time

Best practices include:

• Tunneling of EVDs to reduce infection risk
• Minimizing manipulation of the system
• Regular transducer zeroing at the foramen of Monro level
• Consideration of prophylactic antibiotics during EVD placement (though practices vary)

Renal Replacement Therapy Access

Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) affects 20-60% of critically ill patients, necessitating specific vascular access.

Types and Selection

Non-tunneled temporary dialysis catheters (typically 12-14 Fr, dual-lumen) are standard for acute RRT, with the right internal jugular position preferred due to:

• Straight path to the right atrium
• Lower infection and dysfunction rates compared to femoral and subclavian sites
• Ease of insertion and nursing care

Tunneled dialysis catheters should be considered when RRT is anticipated for >3 weeks.

Arteriovenous fistulas or grafts are rarely used in the acute setting but may be present in patients with pre-existing end-stage renal disease.

Complications and Management

Complications mirror those of standard CVCs but with higher rates due to larger catheter sizes:

• Thrombosis (up to 46%)
• Infection (4.2 per 1,000 catheter-days)
• Dysfunction due to malposition or fibrin sheath formation

Performance optimization strategies include:

• Position confirmation with imaging
• Adequate blood flow rates (200-300 mL/min)
• Citrate or heparin locking solutions
• Prompt evaluation of dysfunction

Integrated Approach to Device Management

Bundle Approaches

Implementation of care bundles has revolutionized device management in critical care. Evidence consistently demonstrates that multimodal approaches outperform individual interventions for preventing complications. Key elements of successful bundle implementation include:

• Standardized insertion protocols with checklists
• Daily necessity assessment for all devices
• Regular site care and maintenance protocols
• Staff education and competency validation
• Compliance monitoring and feedback

Electronic Documentation and Decision Support

Electronic health record integration has improved device management through:

• Automated reminders for line/tube changes or discontinuation
• Real-time tracking of dwell times
• Decision support for appropriate device selection
• Documentation of insertion procedures and complications
• Integration with antimicrobial stewardship programs

Future Directions

Technology Advances

Emerging technologies promising to transform ICU device management include:

• Antimicrobial-impregnated materials with extended efficacy
• Biofilm-resistant surfaces through nanotechnology
• Smart catheters with integrated sensors for detecting infection or thrombosis
• Wireless monitoring systems reducing connection-related complications
• Automated systems for optimizing device settings based on patient parameters

Research Priorities

Key research priorities in this field include:

• Optimal timing for device replacement versus as-needed replacement
• Device selection algorithms tailored to patient-specific risk factors
• Novel approaches to biofilm prevention and management
• Comparison of newer technologies against established devices with respect to patient-centered outcomes
• Implementation science research on adherence to best practices

Conclusion

Lines and tubes remain fundamental components of modern critical care but require thoughtful selection, skilled placement, and meticulous maintenance to optimize benefits while minimizing harm. Evidence-based approaches emphasizing proper technique, appropriate technology, and integrated care bundles have significantly reduced device-related complications. Continued advances in materials science, monitoring technology, and infection prevention promise further improvements in patient outcomes related to these essential but inherently risky interventions.

References

1. Bell T, O'Grady NP. (2017). Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 31(3), 551-559.

2. Bhattacharjee S, Maitra S, Baidya DK. (2018). Ultrasound guidance for radial arterial catheterization in adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Critical Care, 47, 227-233.

3. Caroff DA, Li L, Muscedere J, Klompas M. (2016). Subglottic Secretion Drainage and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Critical Care, 25(6), 480-487.

4. Chopra V, O'Horo JC, Rogers MA, et al. (2015). The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 36(7), 823-836.

5. Geerts W. (2014). Central venous catheter-related thrombosis. Hematology. American Society of Hematology Education Program, 2014(1), 306-311.

6. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, et al. (2005). Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 366(9484), 472-477.

7. Lamperti M, Bodenham AR, Pittiruti M, et al. (2012). International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access. Intensive Care Medicine, 38(7), 1105-1117.

8. O'Horo JC, Maki DG, Krupp AE, Safdar N. (2014). Arterial catheters as a source of bloodstream infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care Medicine, 42(6), 1334-1339.

9. Pompili C, Detterbeck F, Papagiannopoulos K, et al. (2014). Multicenter international randomized comparison of objective and subjective outcomes between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 98(2), 490-496.

10. Rahman NM, Maskell NA, Davies CW, et al. (2015). The relationship between chest tube size and clinical outcome in pleural infection. Chest, 137(3), 536-543.

11. Saint S, Greene MT, Krein SL, et al. (2016). A program to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in acute care. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(22), 2111-2119.

12. Shah MR, Hasselblad V, Stevenson LW, et al. (2005). Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA, 294(13), 1664-1670.

13. Vincent JL, Marshall JC, Ñamendys-Silva SA, et al. (2020). Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the Intensive Care Over Nations (ICON) audit. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 8(1), 25-36.

14. Wang K, McIlroy K, Plank LD, et al. (2018). Prevalence, outcomes, and management of enteral tube feeding intolerance: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary center. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 42(3), 593-602.

15. Wu SY, Ling Q, Cao LH, et al. (2018). Real-time two-dimensional ultrasound guidance for central venous cannulation: a meta-analysis. Anesthesiology, 118(2), 361-375.

16. Young D, Harrison DA, Cuthbertson BH, et al. (2013). Effect of early vs late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the TracMan randomized trial. JAMA, 309(20), 2121-2129.