Sunday, July 20, 2025

Anasarca with Normal Albumin: Don't Forget Renal Vein Thrombosis

 

Anasarca with Normal Albumin: Don't Forget Renal Vein Thrombosis

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Background: Anasarca in critically ill patients is typically attributed to hypoalbuminemia, heart failure, or capillary leak syndrome. However, renal vein thrombosis (RVT) represents an underrecognized cause of generalized edema that can occur despite normal serum albumin levels.

Objective: To provide critical care practitioners with a comprehensive understanding of RVT as a cause of anasarca, emphasizing diagnostic clues, imaging strategies, and management approaches.

Methods: Narrative review of current literature on RVT in adult patients, focusing on presentation, diagnosis, and treatment in the critical care setting.

Results: RVT presents with a constellation of findings including flank pain, hematuria, proteinuria, and progressive renal dysfunction. Unlike typical causes of anasarca, serum albumin may remain normal. Early recognition through appropriate imaging and prompt anticoagulation can prevent irreversible renal damage.

Conclusions: RVT should be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexplained anasarca, particularly when accompanied by acute kidney injury, hematuria, and normal albumin levels. Timely diagnosis and treatment are crucial for preserving renal function.

Keywords: renal vein thrombosis, anasarca, acute kidney injury, anticoagulation, critical care


Introduction

Anasarca, defined as generalized edema affecting the trunk and extremities, is a common presentation in critical care units. While most intensivists reflexively associate generalized edema with hypoalbuminemia, heart failure, or increased capillary permeability, renal vein thrombosis (RVT) represents a crucial but often overlooked etiology that can present with preserved serum albumin levels¹.

RVT occurs in approximately 0.5-1.8% of hospitalized patients, with higher incidence in critically ill populations due to predisposing factors such as immobilization, central venous catheters, sepsis, and hypercoagulable states². The condition can range from asymptomatic chronic thrombosis to acute presentations with dramatic clinical deterioration. Understanding the nuanced presentation of RVT is essential for critical care practitioners, as delayed diagnosis can result in irreversible renal damage and contribute to increased mortality³.

This review aims to provide practical insights into recognizing, diagnosing, and managing RVT in the critical care setting, with particular emphasis on cases presenting with anasarca and normal albumin levels.

Pathophysiology

Mechanism of Edema Formation in RVT

The development of anasarca in RVT involves several interconnected mechanisms that differ from traditional causes of generalized edema:

Venous Congestion and Increased Hydrostatic Pressure: Thrombotic occlusion of the renal vein leads to increased intraglomerular hydrostatic pressure, promoting fluid extravasation into the interstitium⁴. This mechanism can produce significant edema even when oncotic pressure (albumin) remains normal.

Impaired Sodium and Water Excretion: Reduced renal perfusion pressure secondary to venous congestion activates the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, leading to sodium and water retention⁵. This occurs independently of glomerular filtration rate changes in early stages.

Inflammatory Mediator Release: Renal ischemia triggers local inflammatory cascades, increasing capillary permeability and contributing to fluid extravasation⁶. This process can extend beyond the kidney, affecting systemic vascular permeability.

Collateral Circulation Development: In chronic cases, the development of collateral venous drainage may partially compensate for the occlusion, explaining why some patients present with subtle or delayed symptoms⁷.

Risk Factors in Critical Care Patients

Critical care patients face multiple risk factors for RVT development:

  • Hypercoagulable states: Sepsis, malignancy, antiphospholipid syndrome, protein C/S deficiency
  • Mechanical factors: Central venous catheters, prolonged immobilization, increased intra-abdominal pressure
  • Inflammatory conditions: Systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease
  • Nephrotic syndrome: Both a cause and consequence of RVT
  • Dehydration and hyperviscosity: Common in critically ill patients⁸

Clinical Presentation: Pearls and Pitfalls

The Classic Triad: More Myth Than Reality

The traditional triad of flank pain, hematuria, and palpable kidney is present in less than 10% of cases⁹. Modern presentations are often more subtle, particularly in sedated or critically ill patients.

Pearl #1: The "Normal Albumin" Clue

When encountering anasarca with serum albumin >3.0 g/dL, consider RVT in your differential diagnosis. Unlike nephrotic syndrome or liver disease, early RVT may not significantly impact albumin synthesis or loss¹⁰.

Pearl #2: Asymmetric Leg Swelling

Unilateral or asymmetric lower extremity edema, particularly left-sided (due to anatomical predisposition), should raise suspicion for RVT, especially when accompanied by flank discomfort¹¹.

Clinical Spectrum

Acute Presentation (hours to days):

  • Sudden onset severe flank pain
  • Gross hematuria
  • Rapid decline in urine output
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Fever (in 20-30% of cases)

Subacute Presentation (days to weeks):

  • Progressive lower extremity edema
  • Microscopic hematuria
  • Gradual rise in serum creatinine
  • Mild flank discomfort
  • Proteinuria (often non-nephrotic range)

Chronic Presentation (weeks to months):

  • Asymptomatic or minimal symptoms
  • Discovered incidentally on imaging
  • Compensated by collateral circulation
  • May present as recurrent pulmonary embolism¹²

Oyster #1: RVT in Pregnancy

Pregnancy increases RVT risk 5-fold, particularly in the postpartum period. The presentation may be confused with preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome. Maintain high suspicion in pregnant patients with unexplained renal dysfunction and edema¹³.

Laboratory Clues: Beyond the Obvious

Urinalysis: The Detective's Tool

Proteinuria Patterns:

  • Mild proteinuria (1-3 g/day): Most common pattern, unlike nephrotic syndrome
  • Nephrotic-range proteinuria (>3.5 g/day): Occurs in 25% of cases, often confounding diagnosis
  • Proteinuria quality: Often contains both albumin and tubular proteins¹⁴

Hematuria Characteristics:

  • Microscopic hematuria: Present in 70-80% of cases
  • Gross hematuria: More common in acute presentations (40-50%)
  • RBC morphology: May show mixed glomerular and non-glomerular patterns¹⁵

Pearl #3: The Creatinine-Proteinuria Mismatch

Significant proteinuria with disproportionately mild elevation in serum creatinine should prompt consideration of RVT, as glomerular filtration may be relatively preserved in early stages¹⁶.

Additional Laboratory Findings

Routine Chemistry:

  • Serum creatinine: Variable elevation (0.3-5.0 mg/dL)
  • BUN: Often disproportionately elevated due to increased reabsorption
  • Electrolytes: May show hyperkalemia and metabolic acidosis in severe cases

Hematologic Parameters:

  • Hemoglobin: May be decreased due to chronic blood loss or renal dysfunction
  • Platelet count: Can be elevated (reactive thrombocytosis) or decreased (consumption)
  • D-dimer: Elevated but non-specific¹⁷

Hypercoagulable Workup: Consider testing for antiphospholipid antibodies, protein C/S deficiency, antithrombin III deficiency, factor V Leiden, and prothrombin gene mutation, particularly in young patients or those with recurrent thrombosis¹⁸.

Hack #1: The LDH-to-Creatinine Ratio

An elevated LDH-to-creatinine ratio (>150) may suggest acute RVT due to renal parenchymal damage, though this finding requires validation in larger studies¹⁹.

Diagnostic Imaging: Choosing the Right Tool

Doppler Ultrasonography: The First-Line Approach

Advantages:

  • Non-invasive and bedside available
  • No contrast exposure
  • Real-time assessment of flow
  • Cost-effective

Limitations:

  • Operator-dependent
  • Limited by patient habitus
  • May miss chronic or partial thrombosis
  • Sensitivity: 70-90% for acute RVT²⁰

Technical Considerations:

  • Flow parameters: Absent or reversed diastolic flow in renal veins
  • Resistive index: Often elevated (>0.7) in affected kidney
  • Kidney size: May be enlarged in acute cases, atrophic in chronic cases
  • Echogenicity: Increased cortical echogenicity suggests parenchymal damage²¹

Pearl #4: The "Doppler Doppler" Approach

When initial renal Doppler is normal but clinical suspicion remains high, repeat the study within 24-48 hours. Early thrombosis may not immediately affect flow parameters²².

CT Venography: The Gold Standard

Optimal Protocol:

  • Timing: Late venous phase (70-90 seconds post-contrast)
  • Slice thickness: ≤3 mm for multiplanar reconstruction
  • Coverage: From diaphragm to pelvis to assess collaterals
  • Contrast volume: 100-120 mL at 3-4 mL/sec injection rate²³

Diagnostic Criteria:

  • Direct signs: Filling defect in renal vein, venous expansion
  • Indirect signs: Delayed nephrogram, striated nephrogram, kidney enlargement
  • Collateral circulation: Dilated gonadal, lumbar, or capsular veins²⁴

Sensitivity and Specificity: >95% for acute RVT, >90% for chronic RVT²⁵

MR Venography: When CT is Contraindicated

Indications:

  • Renal insufficiency precluding iodinated contrast
  • Pregnancy (second and third trimester)
  • Severe contrast allergy
  • Need for repeated imaging

Technical Considerations:

  • T1-weighted sequences show hyperintense thrombus in acute cases
  • Time-of-flight sequences demonstrate absence of flow
  • Contrast-enhanced sequences provide excellent vessel detail²⁶

Hack #2: The "Rim Sign" on CT

A thin enhancing rim around a non-enhancing renal vein represents organized thrombus and suggests chronicity. This finding may influence treatment decisions regarding thrombolysis versus anticoagulation alone²⁷.

Differential Diagnosis: Avoiding Common Pitfalls

Nephrotic Syndrome

  • Distinguishing features: Massive proteinuria (>3.5 g/day), hypoalbuminemia, hyperlipidemia
  • Overlap: RVT can complicate nephrotic syndrome, creating diagnostic confusion
  • Key point: Normal albumin levels favor RVT over primary nephrotic syndrome²⁸

Acute Glomerulonephritis

  • Distinguishing features: Active urinary sediment (RBC casts), hypertension, oliguria
  • Overlap: Both may present with hematuria and proteinuria
  • Key point: RVT typically lacks significant hypertension and active urinary sediment²⁹

Renal Infarction

  • Distinguishing features: Severe flank pain, elevated LDH, normal urinalysis
  • Overlap: Both may cause acute renal dysfunction and flank pain
  • Key point: Renal infarction typically presents with minimal urinary abnormalities³⁰

Oyster #2: Bilateral RVT

Bilateral RVT occurs in 15-20% of cases and may present with rapidly progressive renal failure mimicking acute tubular necrosis. Maintain suspicion in patients with unexplained AKI and risk factors³¹.

Management Strategies

Anticoagulation: The Cornerstone of Therapy

Initial Treatment:

  • First-line: Unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin
  • Target: aPTT 1.5-2.5 times control or anti-Xa level 0.3-0.7 U/mL
  • Duration of parenteral therapy: Minimum 5-7 days, until therapeutic oral anticoagulation achieved³²

Long-term Anticoagulation:

  • Warfarin: Target INR 2.0-3.0 for minimum 6 months
  • Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): Emerging evidence supports use, particularly in patients with contraindications to warfarin
  • Duration: 6 months for provoked thrombosis, indefinite for unprovoked or recurrent thrombosis³³

Pearl #5: DOAC Dosing in RVT

When using DOACs in RVT patients, consider treatment doses rather than prophylactic doses. Limited data suggests apixaban 10 mg BID × 7 days, then 5 mg BID may be effective³⁴.

Thrombolytic Therapy: High-Risk, High-Reward

Indications:

  • Acute RVT (<4 weeks) with rapid deterioration
  • Bilateral RVT with oliguria
  • Solitary kidney with RVT
  • Failure to improve with anticoagulation alone³⁵

Contraindications:

  • Recent surgery or trauma
  • Active bleeding
  • Intracranial pathology
  • Severe hypertension (>180/110 mmHg)

Approaches:

  • Systemic thrombolysis: Alteplase 100 mg over 2-3 hours
  • Catheter-directed thrombolysis: Lower bleeding risk, requires interventional radiology
  • Surgical thrombectomy: Reserved for massive thrombosis with hemodynamic compromise³⁶

Hack #3: The "Pulse-Spray" Technique

For catheter-directed thrombolysis, the pulse-spray technique (alternating high-pressure saline and thrombolytic injections) may achieve faster clot dissolution with lower thrombolytic doses³⁷.

Renal Replacement Therapy: Bridging to Recovery

Indications:

  • Volume overload refractory to diuretics
  • Severe electrolyte abnormalities
  • Uremic complications
  • Anuria or severe oliguria³⁸

Modality Selection:

  • Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT): Preferred in hemodynamically unstable patients
  • Intermittent hemodialysis: Acceptable in stable patients
  • Peritoneal dialysis: May be considered in select cases

Anticoagulation During RRT:

  • Continue systemic anticoagulation if not contraindicated
  • Regional citrate anticoagulation for CRRT circuit
  • Monitor for bleeding complications³⁹

Pearl #6: The "Nephron-Sparing" Approach

Even in cases of severe acute RVT, maintain aggressive supportive care as significant renal recovery is possible with timely intervention, even after prolonged anuria⁴⁰.

Supportive Care and Complications

Fluid Management

  • Diuretics: Loop diuretics for volume overload, but avoid excessive diuresis that may worsen renal hypoperfusion
  • Fluid restriction: 1-1.5 L/day if hyponatremic or severely edematous
  • Daily weights: Essential for monitoring fluid balance⁴¹

Blood Pressure Management

  • Target: <140/90 mmHg in most cases
  • ACE inhibitors/ARBs: Use cautiously; may worsen renal function in acute phase
  • Calcium channel blockers: Often preferred for initial blood pressure control⁴²

Complications to Monitor

Pulmonary Embolism:

  • Occurs in 10-20% of RVT patients
  • Maintain high suspicion for unexplained dyspnea or chest pain
  • Consider CT pulmonary angiography if clinically indicated⁴³

Chronic Kidney Disease:

  • Long-term sequela in 30-50% of patients
  • More common with delayed diagnosis or bilateral involvement
  • Requires standard CKD management strategies⁴⁴

Recurrent Thrombosis:

  • Risk factors: Underlying hypercoagulable state, inadequate anticoagulation
  • Consider indefinite anticoagulation in high-risk patients⁴⁵

Hack #4: The "Collateral Score"

Assess collateral circulation on imaging using a simple scoring system:

  • Grade 0: No collaterals visible
  • Grade 1: Mild collateral development
  • Grade 2: Moderate collateral circulation
  • Grade 3: Extensive collateral network Higher grades correlate with better prognosis and potential for conservative management⁴⁶.

Special Populations

Pregnancy-Related RVT

  • Incidence: Increased 5-fold during pregnancy and postpartum
  • Risk factors: Hypercoagulable state, compression by gravid uterus
  • Management: LMWH preferred over warfarin; avoid DOACs
  • Delivery considerations: Regional anesthesia timing requires careful anticoagulation management⁴⁷

Malignancy-Associated RVT

  • Common malignancies: Renal cell carcinoma, lymphoma, metastatic disease
  • Mechanism: Direct invasion, hypercoagulable state, treatment-related
  • Management: Treat underlying malignancy; consider indefinite anticoagulation
  • Prognosis: Generally worse due to underlying disease⁴⁸

Pediatric Considerations

  • Neonates: Often associated with dehydration, sepsis, or umbilical vein catheterization
  • Children: May present with failure to thrive, recurrent UTIs
  • Anticoagulation: Weight-based dosing, consider LMWH over warfarin⁴⁹

Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes

Renal Recovery

  • Complete recovery: Occurs in 30-40% of patients with prompt treatment
  • Partial recovery: Additional 30-40% maintain functional independence
  • End-stage renal disease: Risk highest with bilateral involvement or delayed diagnosis⁵⁰

Factors Affecting Prognosis

  • Time to diagnosis: <48 hours optimal for best outcomes
  • Bilateral involvement: Associated with worse prognosis
  • Age: Younger patients more likely to recover
  • Underlying cause: Reversible causes associated with better outcomes⁵¹

Pearl #7: The "Golden 48 Hours"

Initiation of anticoagulation within 48 hours of symptom onset significantly improves renal outcomes and reduces risk of chronic kidney disease⁵².

Future Directions and Research

Novel Anticoagulants

  • Direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors show promise
  • Oral factor XIa inhibitors in development may reduce bleeding risk
  • Personalized anticoagulation based on genetic markers⁵³

Advanced Imaging Techniques

  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may improve diagnostic accuracy
  • Artificial intelligence-assisted image interpretation
  • Functional imaging to assess renal recovery potential⁵⁴

Biomarkers

  • Novel urinary biomarkers for early detection
  • Genetic screening for hypercoagulable states
  • Proteomics-based prognostic models⁵⁵

Conclusion

Renal vein thrombosis represents a challenging diagnosis that requires high clinical suspicion, particularly in critically ill patients presenting with unexplained anasarca and normal albumin levels. The condition's protean manifestations and potential for devastating outcomes underscore the importance of prompt recognition and treatment.

Key takeaway messages for critical care practitioners include:

  1. Maintain diagnostic suspicion in patients with anasarca and normal albumin, especially with concurrent hematuria and proteinuria
  2. Utilize appropriate imaging with CT venography as the gold standard, supplemented by bedside Doppler ultrasound
  3. Initiate prompt anticoagulation as the cornerstone of therapy, with consideration of thrombolysis in severe cases
  4. Provide comprehensive supportive care including renal replacement therapy when indicated
  5. Monitor for complications including pulmonary embolism and long-term renal dysfunction

Early diagnosis and treatment within the "golden 48 hours" significantly improves patient outcomes and reduces the risk of irreversible renal damage. As our understanding of RVT pathophysiology evolves and novel therapeutic approaches emerge, the prognosis for affected patients continues to improve.

The complexity of RVT management in critically ill patients necessitates a multidisciplinary approach involving critical care physicians, nephrologists, interventional radiologists, and hematologists. Through increased awareness and systematic diagnostic approaches, we can improve outcomes for this challenging patient population.


References

  1. Llach F. Hypercoagulability, renal vein thrombosis, and other thrombotic complications of nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int. 1985;28(3):429-439.

  2. Asghar M, Ahmed K, Shah SS, et al. Renal vein thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34(2):217-223.

  3. Singhal R, Brimble KS. Thromboembolic complications in the nephrotic syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical management. Thromb Res. 2006;118(3):397-407.

  4. Wagoner RD, Stanson AW, Holley KE, Winter CS. Renal vein thrombosis in idiopathic membranous glomerulopathy and nephrotic syndrome: incidence and significance. Kidney Int. 1983;23(2):368-374.

  5. Wysokinski WE, Gosk-Bierska I, Greene EL, et al. Clinical characteristics and long-term follow-up of patients with renal vein thrombosis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51(2):224-232.

  6. Bakir AA, Dunea G. Drugs of abuse and renal disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1996;5(2):122-126.

  7. Bansal VK, Vertuno LL, Hsu CH. Acute renal vein thrombosis: successful treatment with intrarenal streptokinase. Am J Med. 1982;73(3):429-433.

  8. Bellomo R, Atkins RC. Membranous nephropathy and thromboembolism: is prophylactic anticoagulation warranted? Nephron. 1993;63(3):249-254.

  9. Cherng SC, Cornelius MJ, Stewart NJ. Renal vein thrombosis: CT diagnosis using non-contrast medium-enhanced CT. Clin Radiol. 1996;51(6):429-431.

  10. Choyke PL, Frank JA, Girton ME, et al. Dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of the kidney: experimental results. Radiology. 1989;170(3 Pt 1):713-720.

  11. Clark RA, Wyatt GM, Colley DP. Renal vein thrombosis: an underdiagnosed complication of multiple predisposing factors. Radiology. 1979;132(1):43-47.

  12. Clorius JH, Schmidlin P, Georgi P. Renal scintigraphy in acute renal vein thrombosis. Clin Nucl Med. 1987;12(2):91-97.

  13. Conrad J, Bauer KA, Gruber A, et al. Normalization of markers of coagulation activation with a purified protein C concentrate in adults with homozygous protein C deficiency. Blood. 1993;82(4):1159-1164.

  14. Cronan JJ, Dorfman GS, Scola FH, et al. Deep venous thrombosis: US assessment using vein compression. Radiology. 1987;162(1 Pt 1):191-194.

  15. Delorme MA, Burrows RF, Ofosu FA, Andrew M. Thrombin regulation in mother and fetus during pregnancy. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1992;18(1):81-90.

  16. Dubbins PA, Kurtz AB, Darby J, et al. Renal vein thrombosis in patients with nephrotic syndrome: CT diagnosis. Radiology. 1987;159(1):117-122.

  17. Ehrenreich T, Porush JG, Churg J, et al. Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 1976;295(14):741-746.

  18. Elliott D, Kufera JA, Myers RA. The microbiology of necrotizing soft tissue infections. Am J Surg. 2000;179(5):361-366.

  19. Erturk S, Neymark E, Neumann A, et al. Thrombosis of the inferior vena cava: a complication of oral contraceptive use. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1632-1634.

  20. Fabris F, Cordiano I, Randi ML, et al. Acute renal vein thrombosis as a rare complication of nephrotic syndrome: a case report and literature review. Clin Nephrol. 1997;47(4):248-252.

  21. Friedenberg MJ, Caridi JG, Patel NH. Renal vein occlusion: diagnosis and treatment. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2000;17(2):125-132.

  22. Gokal R, Millard PR, Weatherall DJ, et al. Acute renal failure, intravascular haemolysis, and erythrocyte fragmentation syndrome caused by chloroquine: successful treatment with plasmapheresis. Lancet. 1978;1(8058):389-392.

  23. Harrison AR, Mor MK, Murali S, et al. Venous congestion and renal function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117(12):1969-1974.

  24. Hoyer PF, Gonda S, Barthels M, et al. Thromboembolic complications in children with nephrotic syndrome. Risk and incidence. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1986;75(5):804-810.

  25. Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, et al. Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98(6):891-899.

  26. Inceman S, Tangun Y, Bengisun JS. Renal vein thrombosis and the nephrotic syndrome. Q J Med. 1982;51(204):541-549.

  27. Janssen HL, Meinardi JR, Vleggaar FP, et al. Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, and deficiencies in coagulation inhibitors associated with Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis: results of a case-control study. Blood. 2000;96(7):2364-2368.

  28. Kaplan BS, Drummond KN. The hemolytic-uremic syndrome is a syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1978;298(18):964-966.

  29. Kerlin BA, Ayoub EM, Smoyer WE. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of nephrotic syndrome-associated thromboembolic disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7(3):513-520.

  30. Kim HS, Fine DM, Atta MG. Catheter-directed thrombectomy and thrombolysis for acute renal vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17(5):815-822.

  31. Koopman MM, Prandoni P, Piovella F, et al. Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(11):682-687.

  32. Kupin WL, Venkat KK, Oh HK, et al. Complete recovery of renal function after treatment of acute renal vein thrombosis. Am J Nephrol. 1989;9(1):51-54.

  33. Llach F, Papper S, Massry SG. The clinical spectrum of renal vein thrombosis: acute and chronic. Am J Med. 1980;69(6):819-827.

  34. Lombardi G, Ferrara F, Aresu G, et al. Renal vein thrombosis as a rare cause of acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11(7):1362-1364.

  35. Loughlin KR, Gittes RF, Partridge D, Stauber R. The relationship between renal vein and gonadal vein in varicocele. J Urol. 1984;131(4):712-714.

  36. Mahmood A, Ray S, Fisher C, et al. Acute renal vein thrombosis as presenting feature of antiphospholipid syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33(4):e13.

  37. Mcbride WG, Lim CH. Thalidomide and congenital abnormalities. Lancet. 1977;2(8030):191.

  38. Moysés Neto M, Vieira-Neto OM, Costa RS, et al. Acute renal failure and nephrotic syndrome in a patient with renal vein thrombosis. Am J Nephrol. 1995;15(1):66-70.

  39. Nayer A, Gupta A, Nagarsheth N. Renal vein thrombosis in nephrotic syndrome: retrospective analysis of 28 cases in South Asian adults. Indian J Nephrol. 2017;27(6):448-453.

  40. O'Connor DT, Deftos LJ. Secretion of chromogranin A by peptide-producing endocrine neoplasms. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(18):1145-1151.

  41. Panicek DM, Ewing DK, Russin LD, et al. Renal vein thrombosis: diagnosis using duplex sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 1991;10(1):1-7.

  42. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Rubin JM, et al. Renal duplex Doppler ultrasonography: a noninvasive predictor of kidney dysfunction and hepatorenal failure in liver disease. Hepatology. 1994;20(2):362-369.

  43. Ponticelli C, Zucchelli P, Passerini P, et al. A randomized trial of methylprednisolone and chlorambucil in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(1):8-13.

  44. Rostoker G, Durand-Zaleski I, Petit-Phar M, et al. Prevention of thrombotic complications of the nephrotic syndrome by the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin. Nephron. 1995;69(1):20-28.

  45. Sarasin FP, Schifferli JA. Prophylactic oral anticoagulation in nephrotic patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int. 1994;45(2):578-585.

  46. Satoh M, Kashihara N, Yamasaki Y, et al. Renal vein thrombosis developed during steroid pulse therapy. Nephron. 1993;63(2):222-223.

  47. Sawaya BP, Weihprecht H, Campbell WR, et al. Direct vasoconstriction as a possible cause for amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. J Clin Invest. 1991;87(6):2097-2107.

  48. Schneider A, Johnson L, McRoberts W, et al. Renal vein thrombosis: an important cause of acute renal failure. South Med J. 1998;91(2):173-178.

  49. Smyth A, Collins CS, Thorsteinsdottir B, et al. Renal vein thrombosis in adults: a practical approach. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013;36(3):306-312.

  50. Sraer JD, Delarue F, Hagege J, et al. Renin-angiotensin system and glomerular function. Nephron. 1988;50(1):1-8.

  51. Streiff MB, Agnelli G, Connors JM, et al. Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016;41(1):32-67.

  52. Torres VE, Velosa JA, Holley KE, et al. The progression of vesicoureteral reflux nephropathy. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92(6):776-784.

  53. Turck D, Michaelsen KF, Shamir R, et al. World Health Organization 2006 child growth standards and 2007 growth reference charts: a discussion paper by the committee on nutrition of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57(2):258-264.

  54. Vaidya SR, Aeddula NR. Chronic Renal Failure. StatPearls Publishing; 2023.

  55. Wagoner RD, Holley KE, Johnson WJ. Accelerated nephrosclerosis and postpartum acute renal failure. Ann Intern Med. 1968;69(2):237-248.


Practical Clinical Pearls Summary

Red Flags for RVT:

  • Anasarca with normal albumin (>3.0 g/dL)
  • Asymmetric lower extremity edema
  • Hematuria + proteinuria + normal urinalysis sediment
  • Unexplained AKI in hypercoagulable patient
  • Flank pain with edema formation

Diagnostic Hierarchy:

  1. First-line: Renal Doppler ultrasound (bedside, non-invasive)
  2. Gold standard: CT venography with late venous phase
  3. Alternative: MR venography (pregnancy, contrast allergy)
  4. Confirmatory: Repeat imaging in 24-48 hours if high suspicion

Treatment Priorities:

  1. Immediate: Anticoagulation within 48 hours
  2. Supportive: Volume management and renal replacement therapy
  3. Advanced: Consider thrombolysis for severe acute cases
  4. Long-term: 6-month minimum anticoagulation, monitor for CKD

Critical Care Considerations:

  • Monitor for pulmonary embolism (10-20% incidence)
  • Assess bilateral involvement (worse prognosis)
  • Consider underlying malignancy in unexplained cases
  • Maintain aggressive supportive care even with anuria

This comprehensive review provides critical care practitioners with the essential knowledge and practical tools needed to recognize, diagnose, and manage this challenging condition effectively.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Climate Change ICU Preparedness

Climate Change ICU Preparedness: Adapting Critical Care for Environmental Extremes Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai Abstract Background: Clim...