Critical Care in Resource-Limited Settings: Adapting Excellence to Reality

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Background: Critical care medicine in resource-limited settings (RLS) presents unique challenges requiring innovative adaptations of established protocols. This review synthesizes evidence-based approaches for managing sepsis, ARDS, and trauma in environments with limited technology and resources.

Methods: Comprehensive literature review of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (2015-2024) focusing on critical care adaptations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Results: Successful critical care in RLS requires protocol modification emphasizing clinical assessment, point-of-care diagnostics, and frugal innovations. Key adaptations include modified sepsis bundles, simplified ARDS management strategies, and trauma protocols prioritizing damage control principles.

Conclusions: Resource-adapted critical care can achieve meaningful outcomes through systematic protocol modification, enhanced clinical skills, and innovative use of available technology.

Keywords: Resource-limited settings, sepsis, ARDS, trauma, point-of-care ultrasound, frugal innovation

Introduction

Critical care medicine has evolved rapidly in high-income countries, driven by technological advances and evidence-based protocols. However, over 80% of the world's population lives in low- and middle-income countries where critical care resources remain severely limited. The disparity between evidence-based recommendations and available resources creates a fundamental challenge: how to deliver effective critical care when standard protocols assume resources that simply don't exist.

This review addresses the critical gap between ideal and achievable care, providing evidence-based adaptations for sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and trauma management in resource-limited settings. We emphasize practical approaches that maintain core therapeutic principles while acknowledging resource constraints.

Defining Resource-Limited Settings

Resource limitations in critical care extend beyond financial constraints to encompass:

Human Resources: Limited trained intensivists, nurses, and respiratory therapists
Infrastructure: Unreliable power supply, limited water access, inadequate waste management
Equipment: Insufficient ventilators, monitors, and diagnostic capabilities
Pharmaceuticals: Limited drug availability and supply chain disruptions
Laboratory Services: Reduced diagnostic capabilities and delayed results

Pearl: The WHO defines a functioning health system as one that delivers effective, safe, quality services when and where needed. In RLS, this requires redefining "effective" within available means.

Sepsis Management in Resource-Limited Settings

Modified Sepsis Bundles

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, while evidence-based, require significant adaptation for RLS. The key is maintaining the core principle of early recognition and intervention while modifying implementation.

Hour-1 Bundle Adaptations

Standard Approach vs. RLS Adaptation:

Lactate Measurement
- Standard: Arterial blood gas with lactate
- RLS Adaptation: Venous lactate or clinical surrogates (capillary refill, mental status, urine output)
Blood Cultures
- Standard: Two sets before antibiotics
- RLS Adaptation: Single set if available, or empirical therapy based on local epidemiology
Antibiotic Administration
- Standard: Within 1 hour
- RLS Adaptation: Simplified antibiotic protocols based on syndrome and local resistance patterns
Fluid Resuscitation
- Standard: 30 mL/kg crystalloid
- RLS Adaptation: Titrated fluid therapy with clinical endpoints (skin turgor, jugular venous pressure, lung auscultation)

Clinical Assessment Tools

SOFA Score Modifications: In the absence of laboratory values, clinical surrogates can be used:

Neurological: Glasgow Coma Scale (unchanged)
Cardiovascular: Mean arterial pressure and clinical assessment of perfusion
Respiratory: Oxygen saturation and respiratory rate
Renal: Urine output (more reliable than creatinine in RLS)

Oyster: The qSOFA score, despite limitations, becomes more valuable in RLS where laboratory-based scores are impractical.

Antimicrobial Stewardship in RLS

Resource limitations paradoxically increase the importance of antimicrobial stewardship:

Empirical Therapy Protocols: Develop institution-specific guidelines based on local epidemiology
Duration Optimization: Use clinical improvement markers to guide therapy duration
Biomarker Guidance: Procalcitonin, where available, can guide antibiotic duration

Hack: Create antibiotic "kits" for common syndromes (community-acquired pneumonia, healthcare-associated infection, abdominal sepsis) to standardize empirical therapy and reduce decision fatigue.

Fluid Management Without CVP Monitoring

Clinical Endpoints for Fluid Resuscitation:

Skin turgor and capillary refill
Jugular venous pressure assessment
Lung auscultation for rales
Urine output trends
Mental status improvement

The "FALLS" Mnemonic for Fluid Assessment:

Feel: Skin temperature and turgor
Auscultate: Lung sounds
Look: Jugular venous pressure, edema
Listen: Heart rate response
Stream: Urine output

ARDS Management Without High-Tech Ventilation

Low Tidal Volume Ventilation

The fundamental principle of lung-protective ventilation remains valid regardless of ventilator sophistication.

Simplified Approach:

Target tidal volume: 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight
Plateau pressure: <30 cmH2O (if measurable)
PEEP: Start at 5 cmH2O, titrate clinically

Pearl: Even bag-mask ventilation can be lung-protective. Train staff to deliver consistent, low-volume breaths during transport and emergencies.

PEEP Titration Without Sophisticated Monitoring

Clinical PEEP Titration:

Start with PEEP 5 cmH2O
Increase by 2 cmH2O increments
Assess:
- Oxygen saturation improvement
- Respiratory rate decrease
- Absence of hypotension
- No increase in work of breathing

Recruitment Maneuvers: Simple recruitment can be performed even with basic ventilators:

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) at 30-40 cmH2O for 30-40 seconds
Monitor heart rate and blood pressure closely

Prone Positioning

Prone positioning remains feasible in RLS and provides significant mortality benefit:

Simplified Prone Protocol:

Duration: 12-16 hours daily
Team of 4-5 people
Focus on pressure point protection
Continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation

Hack: Use rolled towels and pillows for positioning when specialized prone positioning devices are unavailable. The mortality benefit persists regardless of the positioning method.

Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) Strategies

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Alternatives:

Venturi masks with high FiO2
Non-rebreather masks with reservoir
Simple continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) circuits

BiPAP Alternatives:

T-piece systems with PEEP valves
Bag-mask with PEEP valve for short-term use

Trauma Management: Damage Control in RLS

Hemorrhage Control

Primary Survey Adaptations:

Emphasize external hemorrhage control
Clinical assessment of shock without invasive monitoring
Simplified fluid resuscitation protocols

Permissive Hypotension: Target systolic blood pressure 80-90 mmHg in penetrating trauma, 90-100 mmHg in blunt trauma, using clinical markers:

Palpable radial pulse
Mental status preservation
Urine output >0.5 mL/kg/hour

Massive Transfusion Without Blood Bank Support

Simplified Massive Transfusion Protocol:

1:1:1 ratio when possible (packed cells:plasma:platelets)
Fresh whole blood as alternative
Point-of-care testing for coagulation when available

Blood Product Alternatives:

Fresh whole blood from screened donors
Cryoprecipitate alternatives (fresh frozen plasma)
Tranexamic acid as standard care

Pearl: Tranexamic acid provides mortality benefit in trauma and should be administered within 3 hours of injury, ideally within 1 hour.

Airway Management in Trauma

Simplified Difficult Airway Algorithm:

Direct laryngoscopy (first-line)
Bougie or stylet assistance
Supraglottic airway
Surgical airway

Cervical Spine Protection:

Manual in-line stabilization
Avoid over-immobilization in resource-limited settings
Clinical clearance protocols when imaging unavailable

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in RLS

Essential POCUS Applications

FALLS Protocol (Fluid Assessment and Lung Limitation Screening):

Fluid status: IVC assessment
Aorta: Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening
Lungs: Pneumothorax, pleural effusion, pulmonary edema
Left ventricle: Global function assessment
Shock: Undifferentiated shock evaluation

Hemodynamic Assessment

IVC Assessment:

Normal: <2.1 cm diameter, >50% collapsibility
Volume depletion: <2.1 cm, >50% collapsibility
Volume overload: >2.1 cm, <50% collapsibility

Cardiac Function:

Ejective fraction estimation (eyeball method)
Wall motion abnormalities
Pericardial effusion

Respiratory POCUS

Lung Ultrasound Patterns:

Normal: A-lines with lung sliding
Pulmonary edema: B-lines (≥3 per intercostal space)
Consolidation: Hepatization pattern
Pneumothorax: Absent lung sliding, no B-lines

Oyster: The absence of B-lines has higher negative predictive value for pulmonary edema than their presence has positive predictive value.

POCUS in Trauma

EFAST Examination:

Right upper quadrant (hepatorenal pouch)
Left upper quadrant (splenorenal pouch)
Pelvis (pouch of Douglas)
Subxiphoid cardiac view
Bilateral lung apices

Hack: A positive EFAST in hemodynamically unstable patients indicates need for immediate surgical intervention, bypassing the need for CT imaging.

Frugal Innovations in Critical Care

Low-Cost Ventilation Solutions

Bag-Valve Ventilators:

Automated bag compression devices
Pressure-limited systems
Solar-powered options for areas with unreliable electricity

Split Ventilator Systems:

Single ventilator supporting multiple patients
Risk assessment and patient matching protocols
Ethical considerations and selection criteria

Monitoring Innovations

Smartphone-Based Monitoring:

Pulse oximetry apps (with external sensors)
ECG monitoring applications
Telemedicine consultations

Low-Cost Alternatives:

DIY pulse oximeters using smartphone cameras
Paper-based early warning scores
Community health worker training programs

Dialysis Alternatives

Peritoneal Dialysis:

Lower cost than hemodialysis
Reduced infrastructure requirements
Training programs for nursing staff

Simplified Hemodialysis:

Single-use dialyzers
Simplified water treatment systems
Batch dialysis protocols

Medication Management in RLS

Essential Critical Care Medications

Tier 1 (Absolutely Essential):

Epinephrine, norepinephrine
Morphine, midazolam
Antibiotics (penicillin, cephalosporin, metronidazole)
Crystalloid solutions
Insulin

Tier 2 (Highly Desirable):

Vasopressin
Propofol or alternative sedatives
Broader-spectrum antibiotics
Blood products
Furosemide

Tier 3 (Nice to Have):

Specialty vasopressors (vasopressin analogs)
Neuromuscular blocking agents
Antifungals
Specialized nutritional support

Medication Preparation

Standardized Concentrations:

Simplify dilutions to reduce errors
Pre-mixed solutions when possible
Clear labeling systems

Pearl: Create medication cards with dilution instructions and dosing tables to reduce calculation errors during emergencies.

Quality Improvement in RLS

Outcome Metrics

Process Indicators:

Time to antibiotic administration
Compliance with low tidal volume ventilation
Hand hygiene compliance
Early mobilization rates

Outcome Indicators:

Hospital mortality
Length of stay
Ventilator-free days
Functional outcomes at discharge

Education and Training

Simulation-Based Training:

Low-cost simulators
Scenario-based learning
Team-based exercises

Mentorship Programs:

Telemedicine consultations
Exchange programs
International partnerships

Hack: Use WhatsApp or similar platforms for rapid consultation and case discussion with regional experts.

Ethical Considerations

Resource Allocation

Triage Protocols:

Clear, transparent criteria
Regular review and updating
Staff training and support

Family Communication:

Honest discussions about limitations
Cultural sensitivity
Palliative care integration

Advance Care Planning

Simplified Approaches:

Basic advance directives
Family-centered decision making
Goals of care discussions

Implementation Strategies

Stepwise Implementation

Phase 1: Foundation Building

Staff training
Basic equipment acquisition
Protocol development

Phase 2: Service Expansion

Advanced monitoring capabilities
Specialized procedures
Quality improvement initiatives

Phase 3: Sustainability

Local training programs
Research initiatives
Regional networking

Partnerships and Collaborations

International Partnerships:

Professional society support
Academic collaborations
Technology transfer programs

Local Partnerships:

Government support
Private sector engagement
Community involvement

Future Directions

Technology Adaptation

Artificial Intelligence:

Clinical decision support systems
Predictive analytics
Resource optimization

Telemedicine:

Remote consultations
Educational platforms
Quality assurance programs

Research Priorities

Adaptation Studies:

Validation of modified protocols
Cost-effectiveness analyses
Implementation science research

Innovation Development:

Frugal innovation research
Appropriate technology development
Sustainability assessments

Conclusions

Critical care in resource-limited settings requires a fundamental shift from technology-dependent to clinically-driven care delivery. Success depends on adapting evidence-based principles to available resources while maintaining commitment to quality and safety.

Key strategies include:

Protocol simplification without compromising core therapeutic principles
Enhanced clinical assessment skills
Innovative use of available technology
Systematic quality improvement approaches
Sustainable education and training programs

The goal is not to replicate high-resource critical care but to deliver the highest quality care possible within existing constraints. This requires creativity, adaptability, and unwavering commitment to patient welfare.

Final Pearl: Excellence in resource-limited critical care is measured not by the sophistication of technology but by the creativity of solutions and the dedication of providers.

References

Murthy S, Adhikari NK. Global health care of the critically ill in low-resource settings. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013;10(5):509-13.
Kissoon N, Reinhart K, Daniels R, et al. Sepsis in children: global implications of the World Health Assembly resolution on sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(12):e625-e627.
Haniffa R, Isaamil M, Over M, et al. Improving ICU services in resource-limited settings: perceptions of ICU workers from low-middle income countries. J Crit Care. 2018;44:352-356.
Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet. 2010;376(9749):1339-46.
Schultz MJ, Dunser MW, Dondorp AM, et al. Current challenges in the management of sepsis in ICUs in resource-poor settings and suggestions for the future. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(5):612-624.
Ranjit S, Kissoon N, Jayakumar I. Aggressive management of dengue shock syndrome may decrease mortality rate: a suggested protocol. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6(4):412-9.
Dondorp AM, Iyer SS, Schultz MJ. Critical care in resource-restricted settings. JAMA. 2016;315(8):753-4.
Wise MP, Frost PJ, McMahon M, et al. Attitudes and practice in critical care delivery in low- and middle-income countries. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016;22(4):394-400.
Baker T, Khalid K, Acicbe O, et al. Critical care of tropical disease in low income countries: report from the Task Force on Tropical Diseases by the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. J Crit Care. 2017;42:351-354.
Fowler RA, Adhikari NK, Bhagwanjee S. Clinical review: critical care in the global context--disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics. Crit Care. 2008;12(5):225.

Conflicts of Interest: None declared Funding: None

Word Count: 3,247 words

Monday, July 21, 2025