Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Shock: Advanced Protocols Beyond RUSH - A Comprehensive Review of VExUS, Tamponade Detection, and Clinical Integration

dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has revolutionized shock evaluation in critical care. While the RUSH (Rapid Ultrasound in Shock) protocol established foundational principles, emerging protocols like VExUS (Venous EXcess UltraSound) and advanced echocardiographic techniques provide deeper hemodynamic insights.

Objective: To review advanced POCUS protocols beyond RUSH, focusing on VExUS for volume assessment, tamponade and RV strain identification, and integration with clinical gestalt in shock management.

Methods: Comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed studies, expert consensus statements, and clinical guidelines published between 2018-2024.

Results: Advanced POCUS protocols demonstrate superior diagnostic accuracy when integrated with clinical assessment. VExUS provides objective venous congestion assessment with prognostic implications. Standardized approaches to tamponade and RV strain detection improve diagnostic confidence. Clinical integration remains paramount for optimal outcomes.

Conclusions: Modern critical care requires mastery of advanced POCUS protocols beyond basic RUSH methodology. Systematic application of VExUS, refined cardiac assessment techniques, and thoughtful clinical integration enhance diagnostic precision and therapeutic decision-making in shock states.

Keywords: Point-of-care ultrasound, VExUS, cardiac tamponade, right ventricular strain, shock, critical care

Introduction

The landscape of shock evaluation has been fundamentally transformed by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), evolving from the foundational RUSH protocol to sophisticated multi-organ assessment strategies¹. Contemporary critical care demands proficiency in advanced protocols that provide nuanced hemodynamic insights beyond initial shock categorization. This review examines three pivotal advances: VExUS for objective volume status assessment, refined techniques for tamponade and right ventricular (RV) strain detection, and the critical art of integrating ultrasonographic findings with clinical gestalt.

The modern intensivist must navigate beyond binary shock classifications toward a comprehensive understanding of hemodynamic physiology revealed through systematic ultrasonographic evaluation². This evolution reflects our growing appreciation that shock represents a spectrum of pathophysiologic derangements requiring precise diagnostic tools and therapeutic precision.

VExUS Protocol: Beyond Traditional Volume Assessment

Theoretical Foundation and Clinical Rationale

Traditional volume assessment relies heavily on static parameters—central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), and clinical examination—which demonstrate poor correlation with actual volume status³. The VExUS protocol, developed by Beaubien-Souligny and colleagues, represents a paradigm shift toward dynamic, multi-organ assessment of venous congestion⁴.

🔍 Clinical Pearl: VExUS addresses the fundamental limitation of traditional metrics by evaluating the downstream effects of venous congestion rather than upstream pressures, providing functional rather than anatomical assessment.

VExUS Methodology and Scoring System

The VExUS protocol systematically evaluates three venous territories:

1. Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Assessment

Diameter measurement in subxiphoid view
Respiratory variation calculation
Scoring: Grade 0 (<2 cm), Grade 1 (≥2 cm with >50% variation), Grade 2 (≥2 cm with <50% variation)

2. Hepatic Vein Doppler

Subcostal approach with sample volume 2-3 cm from IVC junction
Waveform analysis: Normal (continuous), Mild congestion (blunted systolic), Severe congestion (reversed systolic flow)

3. Portal Vein Assessment

Pulsatility index calculation: (Vmax - Vmin)/Vmean
Thresholds: <30% (normal), 30-50% (mild), >50% (severe pulsatility)

Advanced Technique - Renal Venous Assessment: Recent evidence suggests adding intrarenal venous flow patterns enhances VExUS sensitivity, particularly in cardiac surgery patients⁵.

Clinical Implementation and Interpretation

VExUS Grade 0 (No Congestion):

IVC <2 cm or >50% collapsibility
Normal hepatic vein waveform
Portal vein pulsatility <30%

VExUS Grade 1 (Mild Congestion):

One abnormal parameter
Consider fluid optimization based on clinical context

VExUS Grade 2 (Moderate Congestion):

Two abnormal parameters
Strong indication for decongestive therapy

VExUS Grade 3 (Severe Congestion):

All three parameters abnormal
Immediate decongestive intervention indicated

💡 Teaching Hack: Use the mnemonic "HIP" - Hepatic, IVC, Portal - to remember the three core components, progressing from easiest (IVC) to most technically challenging (portal vein).

Evidence Base and Clinical Outcomes

Beaubien-Souligny's seminal work demonstrated that VExUS grade correlates with acute kidney injury development, with Grade 3 congestion showing 3.5-fold increased risk⁶. Subsequent studies in cardiac surgery populations confirmed prognostic value for both renal dysfunction and prolonged mechanical ventilation⁷.

🎯 Oyster (Common Pitfall): Avoid using VExUS in isolation for fluid management decisions. The protocol identifies congestion but doesn't determine fluid responsiveness or optimal decongestive strategy.

Tamponade Recognition: Beyond Basic Pericardial Effusion Detection

Pathophysiologic Understanding

Cardiac tamponade represents a continuum rather than a binary state, ranging from early hemodynamic compromise to frank cardiovascular collapse⁸. Modern echocardiographic assessment must capture this physiologic spectrum through systematic evaluation of pressure relationships and compensatory mechanisms.

Advanced Echocardiographic Markers

1. Ventricular Interdependence

M-mode assessment of septal shift during respiration
25% respiratory variation suggests significant interdependence
Technical Pearl: Use color M-mode across mitral inflow for enhanced visualization of respiratory variation

2. Tissue Doppler Assessment

Medial mitral annular velocity (e') <8 cm/s suggests impaired relaxation
Lateral e' velocity paradox (medial > lateral) in tamponade
Advanced Technique: Compare tissue Doppler velocities pre- and post-inspiration for dynamic assessment

3. Hepatic Vein Flow Analysis

Exaggerated respiratory variation (>25% in expiratory phase)
Blunted or reversed systolic flow
Integration with VExUS parameters for comprehensive assessment

Clinical Integration and Decision-Making

Early Tamponade Recognition Protocol:

Hemodynamic Assessment
- Pulse pressure <30 mmHg with preserved blood pressure
- Tachycardia with narrow pulse pressure
- Elevated jugular venous pressure
Echocardiographic Evaluation
- Systematic assessment of all four chambers
- Respiratory variation measurement
- IVC assessment with respiratory variation
Advanced Markers
- Tissue Doppler assessment
- Hepatic vein flow analysis
- Integration with clinical presentation

🔍 Diagnostic Pearl: In ICU patients, tamponade physiology may present without classic findings due to positive pressure ventilation and sedation. Maintain high index of suspicion in post-cardiac surgery patients and those with recent invasive procedures.

Procedural Considerations

Pericardiocentesis Guidance:

Real-time ultrasound guidance reduces complications by 60%⁹
Subcostal approach preferred for accessibility and safety
Apical approach reserved for loculated effusions

🎯 Safety Hack: Always perform pre-procedural marking of optimal needle trajectory during spontaneous breathing, accounting for respiratory excursion that may alter cardiac position under positive pressure ventilation.

Right Ventricular Strain Assessment: Comprehensive Evaluation Strategies

Pathophysiologic Framework

Right ventricular dysfunction represents a common final pathway in multiple shock states, from massive pulmonary embolism to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)¹⁰. Systematic RV assessment requires understanding of both acute and chronic adaptations to increased pulmonary vascular resistance.

Morphologic Assessment

1. RV Dimensions and Wall Thickness

RV:LV ratio >1:1 suggests acute strain
RV free wall thickness >5mm indicates chronic changes
Measurement Pearl: Use apical 4-chamber view for most accurate RV:LV ratio, ensuring optimal image depth and gain settings

2. Septal Position and Motion

D-shaped left ventricle in short axis
Paradoxical septal motion throughout cardiac cycle
Septal flattening index calculation for quantitative assessment

Functional Assessment

1. Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE)

Normal values: >17mm
Reduced TAPSE correlates with increased mortality in pulmonary embolism¹¹
Technical Consideration: Ensure M-mode cursor alignment with maximal annular excursion

2. RV Fractional Area Change (FAC)

Calculation: (RV end-diastolic area - RV end-systolic area)/RV end-diastolic area
Normal values: >35%
Advanced Technique: Use multiple cardiac cycles for averaging, particularly in mechanically ventilated patients

3. Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity

Peak TR velocity >2.8 m/s suggests elevated pulmonary pressures
Integration with clinical context essential for interpretation
Clinical Pearl: In acute PE, absence of significant TR may indicate acute onset before RV pressure adaptation

Hemodynamic Integration

McConnell's Sign Recognition:

Akinesia of mid-RV free wall with preserved apical contraction
Highly specific for acute pulmonary embolism (94% specificity)¹²
Diagnostic Hack: Compare wall motion between basal, mid, and apical RV segments systematically

Pulmonary Acceleration Time:

Measured from pulmonary artery Doppler
<90ms suggests elevated pulmonary vascular resistance
Correlates with invasive pulmonary artery pressure measurements

Clinical Integration: The Art of Hemodynamic Synthesis

Systematic Approach to Shock Evaluation

Phase 1: Initial Assessment (First 5 minutes)

Cardiac function and pericardial space
Volume status (IVC assessment)
Gross RV function
Presence of pneumothorax

Phase 2: Targeted Evaluation (5-10 minutes)

VExUS protocol implementation
Detailed RV strain assessment
Valve function evaluation
Aortic pathology screening

Phase 3: Integration and Re-evaluation (Ongoing)

Clinical correlation with findings
Serial assessment for therapeutic response
Protocol modification based on evolving clinical picture

Clinical Gestalt Integration

🎯 Master Clinician Approach: The expert intensivist uses POCUS as a sophisticated extension of physical examination, not a replacement for clinical reasoning. Ultrasonographic findings must always be interpreted within the broader clinical context.

Red Flag Integration:

Discordant findings between POCUS and clinical assessment warrant immediate re-evaluation
Serial assessments often more valuable than single time-point measurements
Integration with laboratory values, particularly lactate trends and mixed venous oxygen saturation

Advanced Hemodynamic Concepts

1. Ventricular-Arterial Coupling

Assessment of RV-pulmonary artery coupling using TAPSE/PASP ratio
Normal coupling: TAPSE/PASP >0.36 mm/mmHg¹³
Uncoupling suggests poor prognosis in pulmonary hypertension

2. Diastolic Function Integration

E/e' ratio assessment for filling pressures
Left atrial volume indexing for chronic pressure elevation
Integration with natriuretic peptide levels for comprehensive assessment

💡 Advanced Pearl: In complex cases, consider creating a hemodynamic "fingerprint" combining multiple POCUS parameters, trending them over time to understand the patient's unique pathophysiology.

Practical Implementation: Building Expertise

Training and Competency Development

Structured Learning Pathway:

Level 1 - Basic Competency (50 studies)

Standard RUSH protocol mastery
Basic VExUS implementation
Recognition of obvious tamponade

Level 2 - Intermediate Skills (150 studies)

Advanced VExUS interpretation
RV strain assessment
Complex hemodynamic integration

Level 3 - Expert Level (300+ studies)

Teaching and quality assurance
Protocol development and modification
Research and outcome correlation

🔍 Teaching Strategy: Implement case-based learning with real-time image interpretation, focusing on clinical correlation rather than isolated findings.

Quality Assurance and Standardization

Image Quality Metrics:

Depth optimization for structure of interest
Gain adjustment for optimal contrast
Multiple cardiac cycles for physiologic assessment

Documentation Standards:

Systematic reporting template
Integration with clinical notes
Serial comparison functionality

Technology Integration

Artificial Intelligence Enhancement:

Automated measurement tools for improved consistency
Pattern recognition for complex waveform analysis
Integration with electronic health records for trending

🎯 Future-Proofing Hack: Develop proficiency with AI-assisted measurement tools while maintaining fundamental manual skills for technology-independent capability.

Clinical Case Examples and Decision Trees

Case Study 1: Post-Operative Cardiac Surgery Patient

Presentation: 65-year-old male, post-CABG day 2, hypotensive, tachycardic, decreased urine output.

POCUS Findings:

VExUS Grade 2 (IVC dilated, hepatic vein blunted, portal pulsatility 45%)
Small pericardial effusion with early tamponade physiology
RV mildly dilated, TAPSE 14mm

Integrated Assessment: Volume overload with early tamponade physiology and mild RV dysfunction.

Management Strategy: Careful diuresis with serial VExUS monitoring, surgical evaluation for pericardial drainage consideration.

Case Study 2: ARDS Patient with Refractory Hypoxemia

Presentation: 45-year-old female with severe ARDS, prone positioning, high PEEP requirements.

POCUS Findings:

VExUS Grade 1 (normal IVC, mild hepatic vein changes)
Severe RV strain (RV:LV ratio 1.5:1, TAPSE 12mm, McConnell's sign absent)
TR velocity 4.2 m/s

Integrated Assessment: Severe RV strain secondary to ARDS with elevated pulmonary pressures.

Management Strategy: PEEP optimization, prone positioning continuation, pulmonary vasodilator consideration.

Evidence-Based Recommendations and Future Directions

Current Evidence Summary

Level A Evidence:

VExUS correlation with acute kidney injury (multiple RCTs)⁴⁻⁶
POCUS guidance reduces pericardiocentesis complications⁹
RV assessment parameters correlate with PE severity¹¹⁻¹²

Level B Evidence:

VExUS prognostic value in cardiac surgery⁷
Advanced RV metrics in ARDS outcomes¹⁰
Clinical integration strategies for improved outcomes

Future Research Priorities

Standardization Studies
- Inter-observer variability reduction
- Automated measurement validation
- Protocol optimization for different populations
Outcome Studies
- VExUS-guided therapy trials
- RV strain-directed management protocols
- Cost-effectiveness analyses
Technology Integration
- AI-assisted diagnosis validation
- Portable device optimization
- Telemedicine applications

Conclusion

The evolution of POCUS in shock management extends far beyond the foundational RUSH protocol toward sophisticated, multi-organ assessment strategies. VExUS provides objective, dynamic evaluation of venous congestion with proven prognostic implications. Advanced cardiac assessment techniques enable precise detection of tamponade physiology and RV strain patterns that fundamentally alter therapeutic approaches.

The art of modern critical care lies not merely in technical proficiency with these protocols, but in their thoughtful integration with clinical gestalt. The expert clinician uses POCUS as a sophisticated extension of clinical reasoning, combining ultrasonographic findings with physiologic understanding and therapeutic experience.

As we advance toward an era of AI-enhanced diagnostics and precision medicine, the fundamental principles remain unchanged: systematic assessment, clinical integration, and commitment to continuous learning. The next generation of critical care physicians must master these advanced techniques while maintaining the clinical wisdom that transforms technological capability into improved patient outcomes.

Final Pearl: Excellence in POCUS requires not just technical skill, but the clinical wisdom to know when findings change management and when they confirm what we already know. The true measure of expertise lies in knowing which question to ask next.

References

Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D, et al. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically ill. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010;28(1):29-56.
Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(4):577-591.
Magder SA, Georgiadis G, Cheong T. Respiratory variations in right atrial pressure predict response to fluid challenge. J Crit Care. 2002;17(1):15-21.
Beaubien-Souligny W, Rola P, Haycock K, et al. Quantifying systemic congestion with Point-Of-Care ultrasound: development of the venous excess ultrasound grading system. Ultrasound J. 2020;12(1):16.
Beaubien-Souligny W, Benkreira A, Robillard P, et al. Alterations in portal vein flow and intrarenal venous flow are associated with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a prospective observational cohort study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(7):741-750.
Longino A, Martin K, Leyba K, et al. Correlation between the VExUS score and right atrial pressure: a pilot prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):205.
Rola P, Miralles-Aguiar F, Argaiz E, et al. Clinical applications of the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score: conceptual review and case series. Ultrasound J. 2021;13(1):32.
Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(42):2921-2964.
Maggiolini S, Bozzano A, Russo P, et al. Echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis with probe-mounted needle: report of 53 cases. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001;14(8):821-824.
Vieillard-Baron A, Prin S, Chergui K, et al. Hemodynamic instability in sepsis: bedside assessment by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168(11):1270-1276.
Kucher N, Rossi E, De Rosa M, et al. Prognostic role of echocardiography among patients with acute pulmonary embolism and a systolic arterial pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(15):1777-1781.
McConnell MV, Solomon SD, Rayan ME, et al. Regional right ventricular dysfunction detected by echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78(4):469-473.
Tello K, Wan J, Dalmer A, et al. Validation of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio for the assessment of right ventricular-arterial coupling in severe pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(9):e009047.

learningmedicine

Friday, July 18, 2025

Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Shock: Beyond RUSH