Bedside Echocardiography for the ICU Resident: A Practical Guide to Point-of-Care Cardiac Assessment

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care echocardiography has revolutionized hemodynamic assessment in the intensive care unit, providing real-time cardiac evaluation at the bedside. For ICU residents, mastering focused cardiac views, fluid responsiveness assessment, and pericardial effusion identification represents essential skills for optimal patient management.

Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of bedside echocardiography techniques specifically tailored for ICU residents, emphasizing practical application, diagnostic pearls, and clinical integration.

Methods: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence-based practices in critical care echocardiography, incorporating established protocols and recent advances in hemodynamic assessment.

Results: Focused cardiac views including parasternal long-axis, parasternal short-axis, apical four-chamber, and subcostal views provide comprehensive cardiac evaluation. Fluid responsiveness can be accurately assessed through passive leg raise testing, respiratory variation indices, and dynamic parameters. Pericardial effusion identification requires systematic evaluation of cardiac chambers and hemodynamic significance.

Conclusions: Bedside echocardiography represents an indispensable diagnostic tool for ICU residents, enabling rapid hemodynamic assessment and guiding therapeutic interventions when integrated with clinical judgment.

Keywords: Critical care echocardiography, point-of-care ultrasound, fluid responsiveness, pericardial effusion, hemodynamic assessment

Introduction

The integration of bedside echocardiography into intensive care practice has transformed hemodynamic assessment from invasive, time-consuming procedures to rapid, non-invasive evaluations performed at the point of care. For the modern ICU resident, proficiency in focused cardiac ultrasound represents not merely an additional skill but an essential competency for comprehensive critical care management.

The complexity of critically ill patients demands immediate diagnostic capabilities that traditional clinical assessment and invasive monitoring cannot always provide. Bedside echocardiography bridges this gap, offering real-time visualization of cardiac structure and function, enabling rapid differentiation between various shock states, and guiding fluid management decisions with unprecedented precision.

This review provides ICU residents with a systematic approach to bedside echocardiography, emphasizing practical application, diagnostic accuracy, and clinical integration. We focus on three fundamental domains: acquiring focused cardiac views, assessing fluid responsiveness, and identifying pericardial effusion—skills that form the foundation of competent critical care echocardiography practice.

Focused Cardiac Views: The Foundation of ICU Echocardiography

Parasternal Long-Axis View (PLAX)

The parasternal long-axis view serves as the cornerstone of cardiac assessment, providing visualization of the left ventricle, left atrium, aortic root, and mitral valve apparatus.

Technical Approach:

Position the transducer in the third or fourth intercostal space, left parasternal border
Orient the probe marker toward the patient's right shoulder (approximately 10-11 o'clock position)
Optimize depth to visualize the entire heart within the sector

Clinical Assessment Parameters:

Left Ventricular Function: Qualitative assessment of systolic function through visual estimation of ejection fraction
Aortic Root Dimensions: Evaluation for aortic dilatation or stenosis
Mitral Valve Assessment: Identification of structural abnormalities and regurgitation
Pericardial Space: Initial screening for effusion

Pearl: The "eyeball ejection fraction" correlation with formal measurements shows excellent agreement when performed by experienced operators, with visual estimates within 5-10% of quantitative measurements in most cases.

Oyster: Avoid over-relying on visual EF estimation in patients with regional wall motion abnormalities, where quantitative methods may be necessary for accuracy.

Parasternal Short-Axis View (PSAX)

The parasternal short-axis view provides cross-sectional cardiac imaging at multiple levels, offering unique insights into ventricular function and valve morphology.

Technical Approach:

Rotate the probe 90 degrees clockwise from the PLAX position
Adjust angulation to obtain optimal cross-sectional views
Sweep from base to apex to assess different cardiac levels

Key Assessment Levels:

Aortic Valve Level: Tricuspid valve assessment and pericardial evaluation
Mitral Valve Level: Left ventricular outflow tract and mitral valve function
Papillary Muscle Level: Optimal for left ventricular function assessment
Apical Level: Evaluation of wall motion abnormalities

Hack: Use the "D-shaped" left ventricle in short-axis as an indicator of right heart strain—a flattened interventricular septum suggests elevated right-sided pressures.

Apical Four-Chamber View

The apical four-chamber view enables comprehensive assessment of all four cardiac chambers and both atrioventricular valves simultaneously.

Technical Approach:

Position transducer at the cardiac apex (typically fifth intercostal space, midclavicular line)
Direct ultrasound beam toward the right shoulder
Optimize gain and depth to visualize all four chambers

Clinical Applications:

Biventricular Function Assessment: Simultaneous evaluation of left and right ventricular function
Relative Chamber Sizing: Comparison of right and left heart dimensions
Valve Function Evaluation: Assessment of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation
Wall Motion Analysis: Regional wall motion abnormalities detection

Pearl: The RV:LV ratio should be <0.6 in the apical four-chamber view. Ratios >1.0 suggest significant right heart strain and possible acute cor pulmonale.

Subcostal View

The subcostal view provides an alternative acoustic window particularly valuable in mechanically ventilated patients and offers excellent visualization of the inferior vena cava.

Technical Approach:

Position transducer below the xiphoid process
Direct beam cephalad and leftward toward the left shoulder
May require deeper inspiration or gentle pressure for optimal visualization

Clinical Advantages:

Mechanical Ventilation Compatibility: Less interference from positive pressure ventilation
IVC Assessment: Optimal view for inferior vena cava evaluation
Pericardial Assessment: Excellent for detecting pericardial effusion and tamponade physiology
Emergency Access: Readily accessible during resuscitation efforts

Hack: In obese patients or those with excessive bowel gas, have the patient bend their knees toward their chest to improve subcostal window quality.

Assessing Fluid Responsiveness: Beyond Central Venous Pressure

Traditional static markers of preload such as central venous pressure have demonstrated poor correlation with fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Dynamic assessment techniques using echocardiography provide superior predictive accuracy for identifying patients who will benefit from fluid administration.

Passive Leg Raise (PLR) Test

The passive leg raise test represents the gold standard for fluid responsiveness assessment in ICU patients, providing a reversible fluid challenge equivalent to approximately 300-500 mL of intravascular volume.

Technical Protocol:

Baseline measurement in semi-recumbent position (45-degree head elevation)
Passive elevation of legs to 45 degrees while maintaining head/trunk position
Immediate measurement of cardiac output change
Return to baseline position and reassess

Interpretation Criteria:

Stroke volume increase ≥10-15% indicates fluid responsiveness
Cardiac output increase ≥10% suggests benefit from fluid administration
Peak response typically occurs within 30-90 seconds

Pearl: PLR testing remains valid in patients with atrial fibrillation, spontaneous breathing, and low tidal volume ventilation—situations where respiratory variation indices may be unreliable.

Clinical Integration:

Perform PLR before each fluid bolus decision
Combine with clinical assessment and other hemodynamic parameters
Document baseline values for trend monitoring

Respiratory Variation Indices

In mechanically ventilated patients receiving adequate tidal volumes (≥8 mL/kg), respiratory variation in stroke volume provides excellent fluid responsiveness prediction.

Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Assessment

Technical Approach:

Subcostal view with M-mode through IVC, 2-3 cm from right atrial junction
Measure maximum and minimum diameters during respiratory cycle
Calculate IVC collapsibility index: (IVCmax - IVCmin)/IVCmax × 100

Interpretation Guidelines:

Spontaneous breathing: Collapsibility >50% suggests hypovolemia
Mechanical ventilation: Distensibility >18% indicates fluid responsiveness
IVC diameter <2.1 cm with >50% collapsibility suggests low right atrial pressure

Oyster: IVC measurements can be unreliable in patients with tricuspid regurgitation, right heart failure, or increased abdominal pressure.

Aortic Velocity Time Integral (VTI) Variation

Technical Protocol:

Obtain apical five-chamber view or deep transgastric view
Place pulsed-wave Doppler in left ventricular outflow tract
Measure VTI for 5-6 consecutive beats
Calculate respiratory variation: (VTImax - VTImin)/VTImean × 100

Clinical Threshold:

VTI variation >20% predicts fluid responsiveness with high accuracy
Combine with stroke volume calculations for comprehensive assessment
Monitor trends rather than isolated measurements

Hack: In patients with poor acoustic windows, use carotid artery Doppler as a surrogate for aortic flow assessment—carotid VTI variation correlates well with aortic measurements.

Advanced Hemodynamic Assessment

E/e' Ratio for Left Ventricular Filling Pressures

Technical Approach:

Obtain apical four-chamber view
Place pulsed-wave Doppler at mitral valve tips for E velocity
Use tissue Doppler at septal and lateral mitral annulus for e' velocities
Calculate average E/e' ratio

Clinical Interpretation:

E/e' <8: Normal left atrial pressure
E/e' 8-15: Intermediate probability of elevated pressures
E/e' >15: High probability of elevated left atrial pressure

Pearl: In ICU patients, an E/e' ratio >15 suggests elevated left ventricular filling pressures and potential benefit from diuretic therapy rather than fluid administration.

Identifying Pericardial Effusion: Recognition and Risk Stratification

Pericardial effusion in ICU patients requires rapid identification and assessment of hemodynamic significance. The spectrum ranges from incidental findings to life-threatening cardiac tamponade requiring immediate intervention.

Systematic Approach to Pericardial Assessment

Qualitative Assessment

Distribution Patterns:

Circumferential: Uniform distribution around the heart
Loculated: Localized collections, often post-surgical
Anterior: Typically smaller, may be post-procedural
Posterior: Often larger, may compress left atrium

Size Classification:

Small: <1 cm separation between pericardial layers
Moderate: 1-2 cm separation
Large: >2 cm separation or complete heart circumference involvement

Echo-free Space Characteristics:

Anechoic (black) appearance between pericardial layers
Moves independently of cardiac motion
Present throughout cardiac cycle (differentiates from pleural effusion)

Quantitative Assessment

Linear Measurements:

Measure perpendicular distance between pericardial layers
Perform measurements in multiple views for comprehensive assessment
Document largest measurement for trending purposes

Volume Estimation:

Small: <300 mL
Moderate: 300-500 mL
Large: >500 mL

Hack: The "fat pad sign"—epicardial fat appears echogenic (bright) and moves with cardiac motion, distinguishing it from pericardial effusion which appears anechoic and moves independently.

Hemodynamic Assessment of Pericardial Effusion

Signs of Cardiac Tamponade

Echocardiographic Criteria:

Right Atrial Collapse: During systole, lasting >1/3 of cardiac cycle
Right Ventricular Collapse: During diastole, indicating severe compromise
Ventricular Interdependence: Reciprocal changes in ventricular filling
Respirophasic Flow Variations: >25% variation in mitral inflow velocities

IVC Assessment in Tamponade:

Fixed dilatation >2.1 cm
Minimal (<50%) respiratory variation
Reflects elevated and equalized filling pressures

Clinical Correlation:

Pulsus paradoxus >20 mmHg
Elevated jugular venous pressure
Hypotension with compensatory tachycardia
Narrow pulse pressure

Pearl for Tamponade Recognition

The "60:60:60 rule" suggests cardiac tamponade when:

Heart rate >60 bpm with relative bradycardia for clinical condition
Pulsus paradoxus >60% of normal variation
Right atrial pressure >60% of systolic blood pressure

Oyster: Low-pressure tamponade can occur in hypovolemic patients, presenting with normal blood pressure but significant respirophasic flow variations—maintain high clinical suspicion in post-cardiac surgery patients.

Differential Diagnosis

Pericardial vs. Pleural Effusion

Distinguishing Features:

Pericardial: Anterior and posterior to heart, moves independently
Pleural: Posterior to heart, may compress left atrium, associated with lung pathology

Technical Differentiation:

Pericardial effusion visible in parasternal long-axis view
Pleural effusion typically requires posterior angulation for visualization
Descending aorta serves as anatomical landmark—pericardial effusion lies anterior, pleural effusion posterior

Epicardial Fat vs. Pericardial Effusion

Key Differences:

Epicardial fat: Echogenic, follows cardiac motion, more prominent over right ventricle
Pericardial effusion: Anechoic, independent motion, circumferential distribution

Clinical Integration and Workflow Optimization

Systematic Approach to ICU Echocardiography

The "FALLS" Protocol

F - Fluid assessment (IVC, PLR, respiratory variation) A - Aortic outflow (cardiac output, systolic function) L - Left ventricular function (regional and global assessment) L - Lung sliding (rule out pneumothorax) S - Shock evaluation (differentiate cardiogenic, distributive, hypovolemic)

This structured approach ensures comprehensive evaluation while maintaining efficiency in clinical workflow.

Quality Assurance and Image Optimization

Technical Considerations:

Gain Adjustment: Optimize to reduce noise while maintaining tissue definition
Depth Setting: Include relevant structures while maximizing resolution
Focus Zone Position: Align with area of interest for optimal lateral resolution
Time Gain Compensation: Adjust for uniform brightness throughout sector

Documentation Standards:

Save representative loops of each view
Include measurements and calculations
Document clinical correlation and decision-making
Maintain consistency in imaging protocols

Educational Framework for Skill Development

Competency Milestones

Novice Level (0-50 studies):

Basic view acquisition
Qualitative left ventricular function assessment
Recognition of obvious pericardial effusion

Intermediate Level (50-150 studies):

Consistent image optimization
Quantitative measurements and calculations
Fluid responsiveness assessment
Integration with clinical decision-making

Advanced Level (>150 studies):

Complex hemodynamic assessment
Troubleshooting difficult imaging conditions
Teaching and mentoring junior residents
Research and quality improvement activities

Structured Learning Approach

Phase 1: Didactic Foundation

Cardiac anatomy and physiology review
Ultrasound physics and instrumentation
Normal variants and common pathology

Phase 2: Simulation-Based Training

High-fidelity mannequin practice
Case-based scenario training
Error recognition and correction

Phase 3: Supervised Clinical Practice

Gradual independence with expert oversight
Real-time feedback and correction
Progressive complexity of cases

Phase 4: Independent Practice

Autonomous decision-making
Peer consultation when appropriate
Continuous quality improvement

Limitations and Pitfalls

Technical Limitations

Patient Factors:

Obesity limiting acoustic windows
Mechanical ventilation affecting image quality
Patient positioning constraints in ICU environment
Surgical dressings and invasive devices

Operator Dependencies:

Learning curve for image acquisition and interpretation
Inter-observer variability in measurements
Time constraints in emergency situations
Equipment availability and functionality

Clinical Limitations

Diagnostic Accuracy:

Cannot replace comprehensive transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography
Limited evaluation of valve pathology and congenital heart disease
Difficulty in quantifying complex hemodynamic relationships
Potential for misinterpretation without adequate training

Integration Challenges:

Over-reliance on isolated findings without clinical context
Failure to recognize limitations of bedside assessment
Inadequate follow-up and trending of findings
Communication gaps between team members

Risk Mitigation Strategies

Standardized Protocols: Implement consistent imaging and interpretation guidelines
Quality Assurance Programs: Regular image review and feedback sessions
Continuing Education: Ongoing training and competency assessment
Expert Consultation: Established pathways for complex case discussion
Technology Integration: Modern ultrasound systems with advanced measurement tools

Future Directions and Emerging Technologies

Artificial Intelligence Integration

Machine Learning Applications:

Automated view recognition and optimization
Real-time measurement assistance and error detection
Pattern recognition for pathology identification
Decision support algorithms for clinical integration

Clinical Implementation:

Reduction in learning curve for novice operators
Improved consistency in measurements and interpretations
Enhanced diagnostic accuracy through computer-assisted analysis
Potential for remote consultation and expertise sharing

Advanced Imaging Modalities

Three-Dimensional Echocardiography:

Comprehensive cardiac chamber assessment
Improved accuracy of volume calculations
Enhanced visualization of complex pathology
Real-time guidance for interventional procedures

Strain Imaging:

Early detection of myocardial dysfunction
Differentiation between various cardiomyopathies
Monitoring of cardiotoxicity in critically ill patients
Assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities

Telemedicine and Remote Assessment

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Networks:

Real-time expert consultation for complex cases
Standardized training programs across institutions
Quality assurance and continuing education platforms
Research collaboration and data sharing initiatives

Conclusions

Bedside echocardiography represents a paradigm shift in critical care medicine, transforming hemodynamic assessment from invasive, delayed procedures to immediate, non-invasive evaluations that directly impact patient management. For ICU residents, mastery of focused cardiac views, fluid responsiveness assessment, and pericardial effusion identification provides essential diagnostic capabilities that enhance clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

The systematic approach outlined in this review emphasizes practical application while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. The integration of focused cardiac views provides comprehensive cardiac assessment adapted to the ICU environment. Dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness surpasses traditional static parameters, enabling precision fluid management that optimizes hemodynamic status while avoiding fluid overload complications. Recognition and risk stratification of pericardial effusion ensures timely intervention for potentially life-threatening conditions.

Success in critical care echocardiography requires not only technical proficiency but also clinical integration skills that combine ultrasound findings with patient presentation, laboratory values, and response to therapy. The structured competency framework presented here provides a roadmap for skill development that progresses from basic image acquisition to advanced hemodynamic assessment.

As technology advances and artificial intelligence integration expands, the future of bedside echocardiography promises even greater diagnostic capabilities and clinical integration. However, the fundamental principles of systematic assessment, clinical correlation, and continuous learning remain unchanged. ICU residents who master these skills will be well-positioned to provide optimal critical care in an increasingly complex medical environment.

The journey to echocardiographic competency requires dedication, practice, and ongoing education. However, the investment yields significant returns in diagnostic capability, clinical confidence, and most importantly, improved patient outcomes. Bedside echocardiography is not merely an additional skill for the modern ICU resident—it is an essential competency that defines contemporary critical care practice.

References

Vieillard-Baron A, Millington SJ, Sanfilippo F, et al. A decade of progress in critical care echocardiography: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(6):770-788.
Neskovic AN, Skinner H, Price S, et al. Focus cardiac ultrasound: the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging viewpoint. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15(9):956-960.
Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6(1):111.
Lanspa MJ, Grissom CK, Hirshberg EL, et al. Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock. Shock. 2013;39(2):155-160.
Millington SJ, Arntfield RT, Chahal N, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and pulse contour analysis: a comparison study in cardiovascular surgery patients. J Intensive Care Med. 2018;33(7):422-431.
Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(7):685-713.
Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(1):1-64.
Porter TR, Shillcutt SK, Adams MS, et al. Guidelines for the use of echocardiography as a monitor for therapeutic intervention in adults. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):40-56.
Sanfilippo F, Corredor C, Fletcher N, et al. Left ventricular systolic function evaluated by strain echocardiography and relationship with mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):183.
Jung C, Bueter S, Wernly B, et al. Simplified protocol for point-of-care ultrasound in ICU patients. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):263.
Bergenzaun L, Ohlin H, Gudmundsson P, et al. Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) in shock: a valuable echocardiographic parameter in intensive care patients. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013;11:16.
Beaulieu Y, Marik PE. Bedside ultrasonography in the ICU: part 2. Chest. 2005;128(3):1766-1781.
Mayo PH, Beaulieu Y, Doelken P, et al. American College of Chest Physicians/La Société de Réanimation de Langue Française statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography. Chest. 2009;135(4):1050-1060.
Arntfield R, Pace J, Hewak M, Thompson D. Focused transesophageal echocardiography by emergency physicians is feasible and clinically influential: observational results from a novel ultrasound program. J Emerg Med. 2016;50(2):286-294.
Hiemstra B, Eck RJ, Koster G, et al. Clinical examination, critical care ultrasonography and outcomes in the critically ill: cohort profile of the Simple Intensive Care Studies-I. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e017170.

Sunday, August 10, 2025