Bedside Echocardiography for the Non-Cardiologist: Essential Skills for the Critical Care Physician

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care echocardiography has become an indispensable tool in critical care medicine, offering real-time hemodynamic assessment that guides therapeutic decisions. Despite its importance, many non-cardiologist physicians lack confidence in performing and interpreting bedside echocardiography.

Objective: To provide a practical framework for critical care physicians to perform focused bedside echocardiography, emphasizing rapid assessment techniques that can be mastered and applied within 2 minutes of patient encounter.

Methods: This review synthesizes current evidence-based approaches to bedside echocardiography, focusing on simplified protocols suitable for non-cardiologist physicians in acute care settings.

Results: We present a systematic approach to bedside echocardiography using the "FALLS-RUSH" protocol, emphasizing four critical views that address the most common clinical questions in critical care: fluid responsiveness, cardiac function, pericardial disease, and right heart strain.

Conclusions: Mastery of basic bedside echocardiography skills significantly enhances clinical decision-making in critical care. A structured approach focusing on essential views and key pathological findings can be rapidly learned and effectively implemented by non-cardiologist physicians.

Keywords: Point-of-care ultrasound, bedside echocardiography, critical care, hemodynamic assessment, POCUS

Introduction

Bedside echocardiography has revolutionized critical care medicine by providing immediate, non-invasive hemodynamic assessment at the point of care¹. Unlike traditional echocardiography performed by cardiologists for comprehensive cardiac evaluation, bedside echocardiography focuses on answering specific clinical questions rapidly and efficiently². The integration of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) into critical care practice has been endorsed by major societies including the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine³,⁴.

The paradigm shift from "complete" to "focused" echocardiography allows non-cardiologist physicians to obtain clinically relevant information within minutes, directly impacting patient management⁵. This review provides a practical framework for critical care physicians to master essential bedside echocardiography skills, emphasizing rapid assessment techniques that address the most common clinical scenarios encountered in critical care.

The FALLS-RUSH Protocol: A Systematic Approach

The FALLS-RUSH protocol represents a simplified, systematic approach to bedside echocardiography⁶,⁷:

Fluid responsiveness
Acute heart failure
Left ventricular function
Life-threatening causes of shock
Significant pericardial effusion
Right heart strain
Undifferentiated shock
Shock, cardiogenic
Hypovolemia

This protocol can be completed in 2-5 minutes and addresses the majority of clinical questions in critical care settings⁸.

Essential Views and Clinical Applications

1. Parasternal Long-Axis View (PLAX)

Probe Position: 3rd-4th intercostal space, left sternal border Key Structures: Left ventricle, left atrium, mitral valve, aortic valve, ascending aorta

Clinical Pearls:

The "Eyeball Method": Assess LV systolic function qualitatively (normal, mild, moderate, severe dysfunction)
Pericardial Effusion: Look for echo-free space around the heart; >2cm suggests hemodynamic significance
Aortic Root Dilatation: Normal diameter <4cm at sinuses of Valsalva

Hack: If you can't see the descending aorta posterior to the left atrium, angle the probe more medially⁹.

2. Parasternal Short-Axis View (PSAX)

Probe Position: Same as PLAX, rotated 90° clockwise Key Structures: LV at papillary muscle level, RV, interventricular septum

Clinical Applications:

Regional Wall Motion: Each segment corresponds to specific coronary territories
RV Assessment: RV:LV ratio >0.6 suggests RV enlargement
Volume Status: "Kissing papillary muscles" suggest hypovolemia

Pearl: The "D-sign" (flattening of interventricular septum) indicates RV pressure or volume overload¹⁰.

3. Apical Four-Chamber View (A4C)

Probe Position: Cardiac apex, probe directed toward right shoulder Key Structures: All four cardiac chambers, mitral and tricuspid valves

Critical Assessments:

Biventricular Function: Compare RV and LV systolic function
Chamber Sizes: LA:Ao ratio >1.5 suggests LA enlargement
Tricuspid Regurgitation: Use color Doppler to estimate pulmonary pressures

Oyster: Don't mistake apical views for subcostal views - ensure proper anatomical orientation¹¹.

4. Subcostal View

Probe Position: Subxiphoid, angled toward left shoulder Key Structures: All four chambers, IVC, pericardium

Clinical Utilities:

Pericardial Effusion: Most sensitive view for detecting fluid
IVC Assessment: Measure diameter and collapsibility for volume status
Cardiac Tamponade: Look for RA/RV diastolic collapse

Hack: In mechanically ventilated patients, IVC collapsibility <12% suggests fluid responsiveness¹².

Rapid Assessment Protocols

The 2-Minute RUSH Exam

For unstable patients requiring immediate assessment:

Subcostal View (30 seconds):
- Pericardial effusion?
- Gross cardiac function?
- IVC size and collapsibility?
PLAX View (30 seconds):
- LV systolic function?
- Significant valvular disease?
A4C View (30 seconds):
- RV size and function?
- Biventricular comparison?
PSAX View (30 seconds):
- Regional wall motion?
- RV:LV ratio?

Clinical Decision Tree:

Normal function + small IVC = hypovolemic shock
Poor LV function + large IVC = cardiogenic shock
Normal LV + enlarged RV = consider PE, RV failure
Pericardial effusion + hemodynamic instability = tamponade¹³

Hemodynamic Assessment

Volume Responsiveness Assessment

IVC Measurements:

Spontaneous Breathing: >50% collapsibility suggests fluid responsiveness
Mechanical Ventilation: <12% collapsibility suggests fluid responsiveness
Normal IVC Diameter: 1.5-2.5cm in adults¹⁴

Pearl: Combine IVC assessment with passive leg raise test for increased accuracy¹⁵.

Cardiac Output Estimation

Simplified Stroke Volume Calculation: SV = LVOT Area × VTI

Where:

LVOT Area = 0.785 × (LVOT diameter)²
VTI obtained from apical 5-chamber view with pulsed Doppler

Hack: Use the "5-20-25" rule - Normal VTI is approximately 20-25cm¹⁶.

Pathological Patterns Recognition

Acute Heart Failure Patterns

"B-lines" on Lung Ultrasound: >3 B-lines per intercostal space indicates interstitial edema
E/e' Ratio: >14 suggests elevated filling pressures
Enlarged LA: LA:Ao ratio >1.5 indicates chronic elevation¹⁷

Right Heart Strain Patterns

Echocardiographic Signs:

RV:LV ratio >0.6 (PSAX view)
RV free wall hypokinesis with preserved apical motion (McConnell's sign)
Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) <1.7cm
Interventricular septal flattening ("D-sign")¹⁸

Clinical Pearl: McConnell's sign is 94% specific for acute pulmonary embolism¹⁹.

Cardiac Tamponade

Echocardiographic Features:

Circumferential pericardial effusion
RA collapse during ventricular systole
RV diastolic collapse (more specific)
Ventricular interdependence
IVC plethora with minimal respiratory variation²⁰

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Technical Pitfalls

Inadequate Gain Settings: Too high = artifacts; too low = missed pathology
Wrong Depth Settings: Optimize to show region of interest
Suboptimal Probe Positioning: Take time to obtain proper windows

Interpretive Pitfalls

Overreliance on Single Views: Always correlate multiple views
Ignoring Clinical Context: Echo findings must match clinical picture
Quantifying the Unquantifiable: Use qualitative assessment when measurements are unreliable²¹

Golden Rule: "A poor-quality image that answers the clinical question is better than a perfect image that doesn't."

Advanced Techniques for Non-Cardiologists

Tissue Doppler Imaging

E/e' Ratio Assessment:

Measure mitral inflow E-wave velocity
Measure tissue Doppler e' velocity at mitral annulus
E/e' >14 suggests elevated LVEDP²²

Contrast Echocardiography

Applications:

LV opacification for wall motion assessment
Bubble study for intracardiac shunt detection
Enhance endocardial border delineation²³

Quality Assurance and Competency

Minimum Training Requirements

Recommended Training Path:

40 hours didactic training
150 supervised examinations
25 examinations in each major diagnostic category
Ongoing quality assurance program²⁴

Image Optimization Checklist

Patient Positioning: Left lateral decubitus for parasternal views
Probe Selection: 2-5 MHz phased array transducer
Machine Settings: Optimize gain, depth, and time-gain compensation
Image Quality: Ensure adequate penetration and resolution²⁵

Clinical Integration and Workflow

Shock Protocol Integration

Hypotension Workup:

Immediate POCUS assessment (2-minute RUSH)
Categorize shock type based on findings
Initiate appropriate therapy
Serial reassessment to guide therapy²⁶

Documentation Standards

Essential Documentation:

Views obtained and image quality
Key pathological findings
Clinical correlation and management impact
Follow-up recommendations²⁷

Future Directions and Emerging Technologies

Artificial Intelligence Integration

Machine learning algorithms are being developed to:

Automate image acquisition
Provide real-time interpretation assistance
Reduce inter-observer variability
Enhance diagnostic accuracy²⁸

Portable Ultrasound Devices

Next-Generation Features:

Smartphone-based platforms
Cloud-based image storage and analysis
Real-time teleconsultation capabilities
Improved battery life and image quality²⁹

Key Clinical Pearls and Oysters

Pearls (Things to Remember)

"The 60% Rule": If you're 60% confident in your assessment, you're probably right
"Serial Studies": Trending is more important than single measurements
"Clinical Context": Never interpret echo findings in isolation
"Quality Over Quantity": Better to do fewer views well than many views poorly
"When in Doubt, Get Help": Know when to consult cardiology

Oysters (Common Mistakes)

"All Black is Not Effusion": Distinguish between pericardial fat and fluid
"Mirror Image Artifact": Can mimic pericardial effusion in liver views
"Athletic Heart Confusion": Large hearts in athletes may appear pathological
"Gain Settings Matter": Inappropriate gain can mimic or mask pathology
"Off-Axis Views": Ensure proper anatomical orientation to avoid misinterpretation³⁰

Conclusions

Bedside echocardiography represents a paradigm shift in critical care medicine, enabling real-time hemodynamic assessment that directly impacts patient management. The systematic approach outlined in this review, emphasizing the FALLS-RUSH protocol and essential 2-minute assessment techniques, provides a practical framework for non-cardiologist physicians to master this essential skill.

Key success factors include: structured training programs, focus on clinical question-driven examinations, integration with existing workflows, and ongoing quality assurance. As technology continues to evolve with AI-assisted interpretation and portable devices, bedside echocardiography will become increasingly accessible and accurate.

The investment in mastering these skills pays dividends in improved diagnostic accuracy, enhanced clinical decision-making, and ultimately, better patient outcomes. Every critical care physician should view bedside echocardiography not as an optional skill, but as an essential extension of the physical examination in the modern era.

References

Labovitz AJ, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(12):1225-1230.
Spencer KT, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(6):567-581.
American College of Emergency Physicians. Emergency ultrasound guidelines. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69(5):e27-e54.
Frankel HL, et al. Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(11):2479-2502.
Vignon P, et al. Hemodynamic assessment of patients with septic shock using transpulmonary thermodilution and critical care echocardiography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(9):1111-1117.
Perera P, et al. The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010;28(1):29-56.
Atkinson PR, et al. Does point-of-care ultrasonography improve clinical outcomes in emergency department patients with undifferentiated hypotension? An international randomized controlled trial from the SHoC-ED investigators. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72(4):478-489.
Lichtenstein DA. FALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock. Heart Lung Vessel. 2013;5(3):142-147.
Rudski LG, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(7):685-713.
Ryan T, et al. An echocardiographic index for separation of right ventricular volume and pressure overload. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;5(4):918-927.
Mitchell C, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(1):1-64.
Maizel J, et al. Diagnosis of central hypovolemia by using passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(7):1133-1138.
Volpicelli G, et al. Point-of-care multiorgan ultrasonography for the evaluation of undifferentiated shock in the emergency department. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1290-1298.
Brennan JM, et al. Reappraisal of the use of inferior vena cava for estimating right atrial pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(7):857-861.
Monnet X, et al. Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid! Crit Care. 2015;19:18.
Quinones MA, et al. Echocardiographic predictors of clinical outcome in patients with left ventricular dysfunction enrolled in the SOLVD registry and trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(5):1237-1244.
Paulus WJ, et al. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(20):2539-2550.
McConnell MV, et al. Regional right ventricular dysfunction detected by echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78(4):469-473.
Kucher N, et al. Regional right ventricular dysfunction detected by echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2003;108(14):1804-1808.
Adler Y, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(42):2921-2964.
Cardim N, et al. Role of multimodality cardiac imaging in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(7):e003430.
Nagueh SF, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29(4):277-314.
Porter TR, et al. Clinical applications of ultrasonic enhancing agents in echocardiography: 2018 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines update. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31(3):241-274.
Expert Round Table on Ultrasound in ICU. International expert statement on training standards for critical care ultrasonography. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(7):1077-1083.
Via G, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for focused cardiac ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27(7):683.e1-683.e33.
Hernandez C, et al. C.A.U.S.E.: Cardiac arrest ultra-sound exam-a better approach to managing patients in cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2008;76(2):198-206.
Johri AM, et al. Can a teaching intervention reduce interobserver variability in LVEF assessment: a quality control exercise in the echocardiography lab. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(3):273-283.
Ouyang D, et al. Video-based AI for beat-to-beat assessment of cardiac function. Nature. 2020;580(7802):252-256.
Kirkpatrick JN, et al. ASE statement on protection of patients and echocardiography service providers during the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(4):648-653.
Panoulas VF, et al. Pocket-size hand-held cardiac ultrasound as an adjunct to clinical examination in the hands of medical students and junior doctors. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14(4):323-330.

Funding: None declared
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest

Thursday, August 28, 2025

Bedside Echocardiography for the Non-Cardiologist in ICU