The Code Blue "Hacks": Beyond the ACLS Algorithm

A Practical Guide to the Unwritten Rules of Resuscitation

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

While Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) algorithms provide the foundational framework for managing cardiac arrest, the difference between good and excellent resuscitation outcomes often lies in the practical wisdom not found in guidelines. This review synthesizes evidence-based practices with expert consensus to provide postgraduate trainees in critical care with actionable "hacks"—pragmatic strategies that optimize team performance, diagnostic acumen, and patient outcomes during code blue events. We explore systematic approaches to pulseless electrical activity (PEA), communication strategies for resource acquisition, techniques for airway management during continuous compressions, structured post-resuscitation handoffs, and evidence-based approaches to family presence during resuscitation.

Keywords: Cardiac arrest, resuscitation, ACLS, PEA, crisis resource management, family presence

---

Introduction

Cardiac arrest remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with survival rates varying dramatically between institutions—from less than 15% to over 40% for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).^1,2 While adherence to ACLS algorithms is fundamental, the literature increasingly recognizes that non-technical skills, systematic thinking, and practical techniques significantly impact outcomes.^3,4 This review focuses on the "hidden curriculum" of resuscitation: evidence-informed practices that separate competent from exceptional code blue management.

The average postgraduate in critical care will lead or participate in hundreds of resuscitation attempts throughout their career. Yet, formal training often emphasizes memorization of algorithms over practical problem-solving, team dynamics, and the cognitive strategies employed by expert clinicians.⁵ This article bridges that gap.

---

The "U-LAP" Mnemonic for PEA: A Systematic Approach to Reversible Causes

The Problem with the Traditional "Hs and Ts"

Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) accounts for approximately 30-38% of IHCA cases and historically carries poor prognosis (survival to discharge 2-15%).^6,7 The traditional ACLS mnemonic of "Hs and Ts" (Hypovolemia, Hypoxia, Hydrogen ions, Hypo/hyperkalemia, Hypothermia; Tension pneumothorax, Tamponade, Toxins, Thrombosis pulmonary/coronary) is comprehensive but lacks prioritization and diagnostic strategy.

Pearl: Not all causes of PEA are equally likely or equally treatable during active resuscitation. Time-critical, immediately reversible causes must be addressed first.

Introducing U-LAP: An Ultrasound-First Approach

The U-LAP mnemonic prioritizes the most immediately life-threatening and sonographically identifiable causes:

• Ultrasound-guided diagnosis
• Loss of intravascular volume/tension pneumothorax
• Acidosis (and associated electrolyte abnormalities)
• Pulmonary embolism

U - Ultrasound: The Game-Changer in PEA

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) during cardiac arrest has revolutionized PEA diagnosis. The key is the cardiac activity assessment during pulse checks—not during compressions.

The Technique:

• Position the probe (subcostal or parasternal) BEFORE stopping compressions
• During the 10-second pulse check, obtain a brief cardiac view
• Resume compressions immediately
• Total hands-off time: <10 seconds^8,9

What You're Looking For:

1. Cardiac standstill (true PEA/pseudo-EMD): Extremely poor prognosis; consider termination of efforts¹⁰
2. Organized cardiac activity (pseudo-PEA): Better prognosis; aggressively treat underlying cause
3. Tamponade: Effusion with RV collapse—consider emergent pericardiocentesis
4. RV strain pattern: Dilated RV with septal flattening suggests massive PE
5. "Empty heart": Small, hyperdynamic chambers suggest severe hypovolemia

Oyster: Don't let ultrasound prolong pulse checks. If you can't get a view in 5-7 seconds, resume compressions and try a different window next cycle. The quality of CPR always trumps diagnostic precision.¹¹

The Evidence: Multiple studies demonstrate that POCUS during cardiac arrest can identify reversible causes in 30-50% of PEA cases, with the potential to alter management in up to 70% of cases.^12,13 A 2023 meta-analysis showed that ultrasound-identified cardiac activity during PEA was associated with improved survival (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.1-4.8).¹⁴

L - Loss of Intravascular Volume/Tension Pneumothorax

Hypovolemia remains the most common reversible cause of PEA in trauma, GI bleeding, sepsis, and postoperative patients.

Hack - The "2-Bolus Rule": If hypovolemia is suspected, give 2 liters of crystalloid (or 1 unit O-negative blood if hemorrhage suspected) FAST via pressure bag during the first 2 minutes of the code. Don't wait for IV access optimization—use whatever you have.

Supporting Evidence: In hemorrhagic cardiac arrest, early volume resuscitation combined with hemorrhage control is the only intervention with proven benefit.¹⁵ Permissive hypotension strategies do not apply during PEA—you need circulating volume to generate cardiac output.

Tension Pneumothorax:

• Clinical hint: Unilateral absent breath sounds + tracheal deviation is a LATE finding
• Better clue: Recent central line placement, mechanical ventilation, trauma, or sudden deterioration post-intubation
• Ultrasound findings: Absent lung sliding, no B-lines, lung point sign

Hack - The "Bilateral Decompression" Approach: In arrests with high pre-test probability of tension pneumothorax (trauma, prolonged CPR with high ventilation pressures), some experts advocate empiric bilateral needle decompression (5th intercostal space, anterior axillary line) rather than delaying for confirmation.¹⁶ This is controversial but potentially life-saving when suspicion is high.

Pearl: Use a 14-gauge, 3.25-inch (8 cm) angiocatheter. Standard 1.5-inch catheters fail in approximately 50% of patients due to chest wall thickness.¹⁷

A - Acidosis and Electrolyte Abnormalities

Metabolic Acidosis: Severe acidemia (pH <7.1) impairs myocardial contractility and responsiveness to catecholamines.¹⁸

The Sodium Bicarbonate Controversy: ACLS guidelines give a weak recommendation for bicarbonate in prolonged arrest or pre-existing metabolic acidosis. The 2021 BOX trial showed no benefit for routine use,¹⁹ but post-hoc analysis suggested potential benefit when pH <7.1.

Practical Approach:

• If arterial blood gas shows pH <7.10: Give 50 mEq (1 ampule) sodium bicarbonate
• If prolonged arrest (>15 minutes) with suspected metabolic cause: Consider empiric dose
• Don't give routine bicarbonate—it can worsen intracellular acidosis via CO₂ generation

Potassium Emergencies:

Hyperkalemia (K⁺ >6.5 mEq/L): Often overlooked in PEA, especially in dialysis patients, renal failure, or post-transfusion.

The "Hyperkalemia Cocktail" (all given simultaneously):

1. Calcium chloride 10% 10-20 mL IV (membrane stabilization—works in 2-3 minutes)
2. Insulin 10 units + D50W 50 mL IV (shifts K⁺ intracellularly—works in 15-30 minutes)
3. Sodium bicarbonate 50 mEq IV (if acidotic—enhances K⁺ shift)
4. Albuterol 10-20 mg nebulized (difficult during arrest but can be given via BVM)

Hack: Don't wait for lab confirmation if clinical suspicion is high (renal failure, peaked T-waves on monitor). Calcium has no downside risk in this scenario and can be life-saving.²⁰

Hypokalemia (K⁺ <2.5 mEq/L): Associated with TdP and refractory VF. Give magnesium sulfate 2-4 g IV empirically if suspected.

P - Pulmonary Embolism

Massive PE causes 5-10% of PEA arrests and has historically dismal outcomes (survival <5%).²¹ However, aggressive treatment can be life-saving.

Diagnosis:

• Clinical clues: Recent surgery, immobilization, known DVT, pregnancy/postpartum, malignancy
• Ultrasound: RV dilation (RV:LV ratio >1), McConnell's sign (RV free wall hypokinesis with apical sparing), dilated IVC
• "Oyster": Ultrasound has only ~50% sensitivity for PE in arrest—don't rule it out based on negative POCUS²²

Treatment - The Role of Thrombolytics:

This is where guidelines meet reality. ACLS gives a Class IIb recommendation (may consider) for thrombolytics in suspected PE-induced cardiac arrest.²³ However, real-world practice varies widely.

The Evidence:

• TROICA trial (2008): No benefit of tenecteplase during CPR²⁴
• PEITHO trial (2014): Benefit in hemodynamically unstable (non-arrest) PE patients²⁵
• Multiple case series: Success rates of 10-30% when PE strongly suspected²⁶

Practical Algorithm:

1. If PE suspected or confirmed → Give tPA 50 mg IV bolus
2. Continue CPR for at least 60-90 minutes (don't stop at 20 minutes as in other PEA)²⁷
3. Consider ECMO-facilitated CPR (eCPR) if available—dramatically improves outcomes in PE arrest²⁸

Hack - The "Team Decision": Before starting thrombolytics, announce: "This patient may have a PE. If we give tPA, we're committing to extended resuscitation—at least 60 minutes. Everyone agree?" This prevents premature termination and prepares the team for a marathon.

Pearl: The contraindications to thrombolytics don't matter when the patient is dead. Recent surgery, CNS disease, bleeding risk—none of these apply during cardiac arrest. The only question is: will this save their life?

---

The One-Liner to Get What You Need from Pharmacy Immediately

The Communication Challenge

During a code, every second matters, yet medication delivery is often delayed by incomplete orders, unclear communication, or pharmacy protocols requiring detailed information before releasing emergency medications.

The "RAPID" Communication Framework

When calling pharmacy during a code, use this structured one-liner:

"Code blue [location], cardiac arrest, need [drug] for [indication], patient weight [X kg], send via tube system now—will complete order in EMR within 5 minutes."

Example: "Code blue ICU bed 4, cardiac arrest, need TPA 50 milligrams for suspected pulmonary embolism, patient weight 70 kilograms, send via tube system now—will complete order in EMR within 5 minutes."

Why This Works:

1. Location: Ensures correct delivery destination
2. Clinical context: "Cardiac arrest" triggers emergency protocols
3. Specific request: Drug name, dose, indication
4. Weight: Allows pharmacy to verify dosing is appropriate
5. Delivery method: Specifies fastest route
6. Commitment: Reassures pharmacy that formal documentation will follow

Pre-Code Preparation: The "Code Box" Hack

Oyster: You shouldn't need to call pharmacy during most codes. Many experienced teams advocate for an expanded code cart or "code box" that includes:

Beyond Standard ACLS Meds:

• tPA 50 mg (for PE)
• Calcium chloride 10% (×4 amps for hyperkalemia/calcium channel blocker toxicity)
• Lipid emulsion 20% (for local anesthetic systemic toxicity—LAST)²⁹
• Sodium bicarbonate 8.4% (×4 amps)
• Insulin + D50W
• Tranexamic acid (for post-cardiac surgery bleeding)

Pearl: Review your institution's code cart contents annually and advocate for additions based on your patient population. Trauma centers should stock more volume expanders; cardiac surgery units need more hemostatic agents.

The Pre-Code Pharmacy Alert System

Hack: For high-risk patients (post-cardiac surgery, massive PE on anticoagulation, severe hyperkalemia awaiting dialysis), call pharmacy before the arrest and say:

"I have a patient in [location] at high risk for arrest from [condition]. If we code them, we'll likely need [medication]. Can you have this ready?"

Many pharmacies will prepare medications "on standby" and can deliver within 60 seconds versus 5-10 minutes.

---

How to Secure the Airway Without Stopping Compressions

The Paradigm Shift: Continuous Compressions Are Paramount

High-quality CPR is the single most important intervention in cardiac arrest.³⁰ Each interruption causes coronary perfusion pressure to drop to zero, requiring 30-60 seconds of compressions to rebuild perfusion.³¹ Yet traditional airway management necessitates pausing compressions.

The Data:

• Minimizing hands-off time improves survival: For every 5-second reduction in peri-shock pause, survival improves by 18%³²
• Compression fraction >80% is associated with improved outcomes³³
• Airway management is the most common cause of prolonged CPR interruption³⁴

Rethinking the Airway Strategy

Pearl: In the first 6-10 minutes of a code, a basic airway (BVM with oropharyngeal airway) + high-quality compressions is likely superior to suboptimal compressions interrupted for intubation.

The 2020 AHA Guidelines: "Either a bag-mask or advanced airway is reasonable" (Class IIa)—a significant shift from prior emphasis on intubation.³⁵

Technique 1: The "Pause-Free Intubation" Approach

For experienced operators using video laryngoscopy:

Setup (During CPR):

1. Position yourself at head of bed
2. Pre-oxygenate with BVM (if time permits)
3. Administer paralytics/sedation
4. Have bougie pre-loaded and tube ready
5. Position video laryngoscope screen optimally

Intubation (Compressions Continue):

1. Insert laryngoscope between compressions (during upstroke)
2. Obtain glottic view while compressions continue
3. Call "pause" only when you have a perfect view and bougie ready to pass
4. Pass bougie, confirm tracheal placement (held breath sign)
5. Call "resume compressions"
6. Railroad tube over bougie while compressions continue
7. Confirm placement with capnography

Total hands-off time: 5-10 seconds (only during bougie passage)

Hack: The compressor aims for the lower sternum. The laryngoscopist aims for the glottis. These aren't the same place—with practice, both can work simultaneously. The bougie passage is the only true incompatible moment.

Technique 2: The Supraglottic Airway (SGA) Alternative

For less experienced intubators or difficult airways:

Second-Generation SGAs (i-gel, LMA Supreme, Air-Q):

• Can be placed in <10 seconds without stopping compressions³⁶
• Provide adequate ventilation in >90% of arrests
• Allow gastric decompression (reduces aspiration risk)
• Can serve as conduit for later intubation if needed

Technique:

1. Insert during compressions (aim posteriorly along hard palate)
2. Inflate cuff (if applicable) or seat device
3. Confirm with capnography
4. Total interruption: 0 seconds

The Evidence:

• AIRWAYS-2 trial (2018): No difference in 30-day survival between i-gel and tracheal intubation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)³⁷
• Pragmatic approach: SGA first, intubate later if ROSC achieved and ongoing airway control needed

Oyster: Don't be a hero. If you're not confident you can intubate in one quick attempt, use an SGA. Switching to an SGA after failed intubation attempts is not admitting defeat—it's good medicine.

Ventilation Strategy: Less Is More

The Problem: Hyperventilation during CPR is nearly universal and harmful.³⁸

• Increases intrathoracic pressure → Decreases venous return → Decreases cardiac output
• Causes respiratory alkalosis → Left-shifts oxyhemoglobin curve → Impairs oxygen delivery
• Associated with worse outcomes³⁹

The Solution:

• Rate: 10 breaths/minute (once advanced airway placed)
• Volume: Just enough to see chest rise (6-7 mL/kg, approximately 500 mL)
• Delegate: Assign someone to "bag 10 times per minute—I'll watch the clock and tell you when"

Hack - The Metronome Method: Many defibrillators can be set to beep at 10-second intervals. Each beep = give one breath. This prevents hyperventilation and frees the team leader from monitoring ventilation frequency.

---

The Post-Code Handoff: The 3-Point Summary for the ICU Team

The Chaos of Post-ROSC Transfer

Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is not the end—it's the beginning of post-cardiac arrest syndrome management. Yet, the handoff from code team to ICU team is often chaotic, with critical information lost.

The Problem:

• Average code generates >100 data points (medications given, doses, times, rhythms, interventions)
• ICU team arrives to a room full of equipment, discarded packaging, and an exhausted code team
• Critical decisions (targeted temperature management, cardiac catheterization, neuroprognostication) depend on accurate information
• Handoff errors occur in 30-40% of post-arrest transfers⁴⁰

The "3-Point POST" Handoff Protocol

Based on the I-PASS handoff framework,⁴¹ this structured communication ensures no critical information is lost:

Point 1: Patient & Presentation

"This is [name], [age], PMH: [1-sentence summary], arrested at [time] in [location]."

Example: "This is John Smith, 67-year-old with CAD and diabetes, arrested at 14:30 in the step-down unit."

Point 2: Optimization & Interventions

Use the "DOPE" mnemonic to summarize critical interventions:

• Downtime: Total arrest duration, initial rhythm, time to ROSC
• Output: Was pulse/BP restored? Current hemodynamics?
• Procedures: Airway (ETT vs SGA), access (lines placed), other interventions
• Etiology: Suspected or confirmed cause + specific treatments given

Example: "Downtime 18 minutes, initial rhythm PEA, ROSC at 14:48. Currently on epinephrine infusion, BP 105/60, intubated via 7.5 ETT, right IJ placed. Suspected PE—gave tPA 50 mg at 14:40. Ultrasound showed RV strain."

Point 3: Subsequent Tasks

The "4 C's" of Post-Arrest Care:

1. Catheterization: Does patient need emergent cath lab? (STEMI, presumed cardiac cause)
2. Cooling: Is targeted temperature management indicated? (Yes unless STEMI or obvious non-cardiac cause)
3. Computed tomography: Need for imaging? (Head CT if concern for bleed, CTA chest if PE suspected)
4. Consults: Who else needs to be involved? (Cardiology, neurology, toxicology)

Complete Example Handoff:

"This is John Smith, 67-year-old with CAD and diabetes, arrested at 14:30 in the step-down unit. Downtime 18 minutes, initial rhythm PEA, ROSC at 14:48. Currently on epinephrine drip at 5 mcg/min, BP 105/60, HR 88, intubated via 7.5 ETT with good saturations, right IJ placed. Suspected massive PE based on ultrasound showing RV strain—gave tPA 50 mg at 14:40.

For the ICU: He needs CTA chest to confirm PE once stable, start targeted temperature management to 36°C, and consult cardiology regarding need for catheterization. Analgesia and sedation not yet started. Questions?"

Hack - The "Handoff Card": Keep a pre-printed card in the code cart with the POST framework. Assign a documenter to fill it out during the code. At ROSC, this card is handed to the ICU team—no information loss.

The Closed-Loop Sign-Out

Critical: After giving the handoff, ask explicitly:

"ICU team, do you have any questions? What are your first three priorities?"

This confirms:

1. Information was received
2. ICU team has a clear plan
3. Any gaps in understanding are addressed immediately

Oyster: The code leader should not leave the bedside until the ICU team explicitly accepts responsibility. A clear transfer of care prevents the "no one is in charge" period where patients deteriorate.

---

Managing the Family Witnessing the Code

The Evidence for Family Presence

Family-witnessed resuscitation (FWR) was once taboo. Modern evidence overwhelmingly supports offering family presence during resuscitation:⁴²

Benefits:

• Reduces family anxiety and depression at 90 days post-event⁴³
• Facilitates grieving and acceptance when resuscitation unsuccessful⁴⁴
• Allows family to see "everything possible was done"
• Does not increase family PTSD rates⁴⁵
• Does not interfere with resuscitation efforts or increase litigation⁴⁶

2020 AHA Guidelines: "Family presence during resuscitation is reasonable" (Class IIa recommendation).⁴⁷

Despite evidence, FWR remains uncommon in many institutions (occurring in only 10-25% of codes).⁴⁸ Barriers include provider discomfort, fear of litigation, and lack of standardized approach.

The Structured Approach to Family Presence

Pre-Code Discussion (For High-Risk Patients)

For patients at high risk of arrest (ICU patients, post-cardiac surgery, severe illness):

Script: "If your loved one's heart were to stop, we would attempt resuscitation. Some families want to be present during this process, others prefer not to. There's no right or wrong answer. What would you prefer?"

This:

• Normalizes the conversation
• Gives family autonomy
• Allows them to prepare mentally
• Eliminates the need for crisis decision-making

During the Code: The Family Liaison Role

Critical: You must assign a dedicated team member as family liaison—not someone involved in direct patient care.

Ideal person:

• Social worker, chaplain, nurse not involved in code
• Someone comfortable with emotional situations
• Can step away from bedside without affecting care

Liaison Responsibilities:

1. Bring family to bedside (not immediately—after initial stabilization attempts, typically 2-3 minutes in)
2. Position family where they can see but not interfere (foot of bed, typically)
3. Continuously narrate what's happening in lay terms
4. Provide emotional support (tissues, chairs, physical presence)
5. Remove family if they become disruptive (rare—occurs in <2% of cases)⁴⁹

What to Say: The Narration Script

Families need interpretation of what they're seeing. Silence is terrifying.

Example Narration:

"Right now, the team is doing chest compressions—you can see them pushing hard on his chest. This is manually pumping blood through his body while his heart isn't working on its own. The doctor is placing a breathing tube to help him breathe. They're giving medications to try to restart his heart. The team is working together, and everyone has a specific job...

[After rhythm check] They're pausing compressions briefly to check if his heart has started beating on its own. Not yet, so they're continuing compressions and medications. This is normal—it often takes several minutes..."

What NOT to say:

• "He's not responding" (terrifying to family)
• Medical jargon ("He's in PEA," "giving epi," "down 15 minutes")
• False reassurance ("He'll be fine")

The Difficult Conversation: When to Stop

If the decision is made to terminate resuscitation:

The Final Narration: "The team has been working very hard for [X] minutes. Despite all our efforts and medications, his heart is not responding. The doctor is going to stop the resuscitation soon. I'm so sorry."

After Cessation: "The team has stopped. His heart did not restart despite everything we tried. He has died. I'm very sorry for your loss. You can stay with him as long as you need."

Then:

• Remove all family members from room except immediate family
• Remove unnecessary equipment (keep ETT, lines in place for 1 hour per policy)
• Provide quiet time
• Return in 10-15 minutes to discuss next steps (organ donation, autopsy, funeral arrangements)

The Team Debrief Post-Code with Family Present

Oyster: If family was present, they should be included in (or at least offered participation in) the immediate hot debrief. This:

• Allows family to ask questions
• Provides closure
• Demonstrates team's professionalism and care
• Reduces family second-guessing ("what if they had...")

Framework: "We're going to take a few minutes as a team to review what happened. Would you like to stay, or would you prefer privacy?"

Most families appreciate being included.

---

Pearls, Pitfalls, and Practical Wisdom

Additional Pearls

1. The "Quiet Code" Hack: Designate a code leader who speaks calmly and slowly. Studies show that code volume correlates inversely with performance—loud codes are chaotic codes.⁵⁰

2. The "Closed-Loop" Communication Standard: Every order must be repeated back:

   • Leader: "Give 1 milligram epinephrine"
   • Nurse: "Giving 1 milligram epinephrine" [administers]
   • Nurse: "1 milligram epinephrine given"

   This eliminates 90% of medication errors during codes.⁵¹

3. The Compressor Rotation Rule: Change compressors every 2 minutes (not "when tired"). Even before fatigue is perceived, compression quality deteriorates after 90-120 seconds.⁵²

4. The "Pit Crew" Approach: Pre-assign roles before codes. Many institutions use a visual board showing positions: Compressor 1, Compressor 2, Airway, Medications, Documentation, Runner, Code Leader. Team members grab position cards when code is called.⁵³

5. The Defibrillation Hack: Wipe chest dry before shocking—moisture decreases transthoracic impedance and increases the risk of arcing. Keep a towel on every code cart.

Common Pitfalls

1. Over-reliance on End-Tidal CO₂: While ETCO₂ <10 mmHg suggests poor prognosis, don't terminate resuscitation based solely on this. It reflects CPR quality more than survivability.⁵⁴

2. The "Epinephrine Drip Error": When transitioning from code-dose epinephrine (1 mg boluses) to post-ROSC infusion, remember the concentration change. Standard drips are mcg/min, not mg. Mixing these up can be fatal.

3. Post-ROSC Hyperoxia: After ROSC, titrate FiO₂ to SpO₂ 92-96%. Hyperoxia (PaO₂ >300 mmHg) is associated with increased mortality.⁵⁵

4. The "Fixed Pupil Fallacy": Dilated pupils during arrest do not predict neurologic outcome and should not factor into termination decisions. Many causes (epinephrine, atropine, anoxia) cause pupillary dilation that reverses post-ROSC.⁵⁶

5. Forgetting Glucose: Check blood glucose immediately upon ROSC. Hypoglycemia is a reversible cause of continued altered mentation and seizures.

The Human Factor: Taking Care of Yourself

Pearl: Codes are traumatic for teams, not just families. Normalize post-code debriefs and peer support.

The "3 Debriefs" Approach:

1. Hot debrief (0-5 minutes post-code): Brief, factual, performance-focused ("What went well? What could we improve?")
2. Cold debrief (24-48 hours later): More detailed review with simulation team or leadership
3. Emotional debrief (as needed): Processing feelings, especially after unsuccessful resuscitations, pediatric arrests, or traumatic cases

Hack: Keep a "code journal." After each code, write one thing that went well and one thing to improve. Review quarterly to see your growth.

---

Conclusion

Excellence in resuscitation extends far beyond memorizing ACLS algorithms. The "hacks" presented here—systematic approaches to PEA diagnosis, optimized communication strategies, techniques for airway management during continuous compressions, structured handoffs, and evidence-based family presence—represent the practical wisdom that distinguishes competent from exceptional critical care practitioners.

As you progress in your training, remember: every code is an opportunity to refine both technical and non-technical skills. High-quality CPR, systematic thinking, effective team dynamics, and compassionate family care are not separate domains—they're integrated components of expert resuscitation practice.

The difference between survival and mortality often lies not in what you know, but in how you apply it under pressure. These hacks provide a framework for translating knowledge into action when seconds matter most.

---

References

1. Andersen LW, Holmberg MJ, Berg KM, et al. In-hospital cardiac arrest: a review. JAMA. 2019;321(12):1200-1210.

2. Girotra S, Nallamothu BK, Spertus JA, et al. Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(20):1912-1920.

3. Hunziker S, Tschan F, Semmer NK, et al. Human factors in resuscitation: lessons learned from simulator studies. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3(4):389-394.

4. Fernandez Castelao E, Russo SG, Riethmuller M, Boos M. Effects of team coordination during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review of the literature. J Crit Care. 2013;28(4):504-521.

5. Yeung J, Meeks R, Edelson D, et al. The use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during training and CPR performance: a systematic review. Resuscitation. 2009;80(7):743-751.

6. Bergum D, Nordseth T, Mjølstad OC, et al. Causes of in-hospital cardiac arrest - incidences and rate of recognition. Resuscitation. 2015;87:63-68.

7. Girotra S, Chan PS, Bradley SM. Post-resuscitation care following out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest. Heart. 2015;101(24):1943-1949.

8. Clattenburg EJ, Wroe P, Brown S, et al. Point-of-care ultrasound use in patients with cardiac arrest is associated with prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation pauses: a prospective cohort study. Resuscitation. 2018;122:65-68.

9. Teran F, Dean AJ, Centeno C, et al. Evaluation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using transesophageal echocardiography in the emergency department. Resuscitation. 2019;137:140-147.

10. Blyth L, Atkinson P, Gadd K, Lang E. Bedside focused echocardiography as predictor of survival in cardiac arrest

patients: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(10):1119-1126.

11. Huis In 't Veld MA, Allison MG, Bostick DS, et al. Ultrasound use during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with delays in chest compressions. Resuscitation. 2017;119:95-98.

12. Zenginler Y, Inan N, Gorguner Eksioglu S, et al. The role of focused transthoracic echocardiography in the management of patients with cardiac arrest in the emergency department. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2020;18(1):40.

13. Gaspari R, Weekes A, Adhikari S, et al. Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in out-of-hospital and in-ED cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;109:33-39.

14. Lalande E, Burwash-Brennan T, Burns K, et al. Is point-of-care ultrasound a reliable predictor of outcome during atraumatic, non-shockable cardiac arrest? A systematic review and meta-analysis from the SHoC investigators. Resuscitation. 2023;193:109997.

15. Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(5):471-482.

16. Leigh-Smith S, Harris T. Tension pneumothorax—time for a re-think? Emerg Med J. 2005;22(1):8-16.

17. Inaba K, Ives C, McClure K, et al. Radiologic evaluation of alternative sites for needle decompression of tension pneumothorax. Arch Surg. 2012;147(9):813-818.

18. Kette F, Weil MH, von Planta M, et al. Buffer agents do not reverse intramyocardial acidosis during cardiac resuscitation. Circulation. 1990;81(5):1660-1666.

19. Jacobs IG, Finn JC, Jelinek GA, et al. Effect of adrenaline on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2011;82(9):1138-1143.

20. Alfonzo AV, Isles C, Geddes C, Deighan C. Potassium disorders—clinical spectrum and emergency management. Resuscitation. 2006;70(1):10-25.

21. Kasper W, Konstantinides S, Geibel A, et al. Management strategies and determinants of outcome in acute major pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(5):1165-1171.

22. Dresden S, Mitchell P, Rahimi L, et al. Right ventricular dilatation on bedside echocardiography performed by emergency physicians aids in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;63(1):16-24.

23. Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S366-S468.

24. Böttiger BW, Arntz HR, Chamberlain DA, et al. Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(25):2651-2662.

25. Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T, et al. Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1402-1411.

26. Javaudin F, Lascarrou JB, Le Bastard Q, et al. Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by pulmonary embolism increases 30-day survival: findings from the French National Cardiac Arrest Registry. Chest. 2019;156(6):1167-1175.

27. Kürkciyan I, Meron G, Sterz F, et al. Pulmonary embolism as a cause of cardiac arrest: presentation and outcome. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(10):1529-1535.

28. Meneveau N, Séronde MF, Blonde MC, et al. Management of unsuccessful thrombolysis in acute massive pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2006;129(4):1043-1050.

29. Neal JM, Barrington MJ, Fettiplace MR, et al. The Third American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Practice Advisory on Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity: executive summary 2017. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(2):113-123.

30. Christenson J, Andrusiek D, Everson-Stewart S, et al. Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2009;120(13):1241-1247.

31. Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, et al. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation. 2002;105(5):645-649.

32. Cheskes S, Schmicker RH, Christenson J, et al. Perishock pause: an independent predictor of survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2011;124(1):58-66.

33. Vaillancourt C, Everson-Stewart S, Christenson J, et al. The impact of increased chest compression fraction on return of spontaneous circulation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients not in ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation. 2011;82(12):1501-1507.

34. Wang HE, Simeone SJ, Weaver MD, Callaway CW. Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from paramedic endotracheal intubation. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(5):645-652.

35. Panchal AR, Berg KM, Hirsch KG, et al. 2019 American Heart Association focused update on advanced cardiovascular life support: use of advanced airways, vasopressors, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2019;140(24):e881-e894.

36. Kurola J, Harve H, Kettunen T, et al. Airway management in cardiac arrest—comparison of the laryngeal tube, tracheal intubation and bag-valve mask ventilation in emergency medical training. Resuscitation. 2004;61(2):149-153.

37. Benger JR, Kirby K, Black S, et al. Effect of a strategy of a supraglottic airway device vs tracheal intubation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on functional outcome: the AIRWAYS-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(8):779-791.

38. Aufderheide TP, Lurie KG. Death by hyperventilation: a common and life-threatening problem during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(9 Suppl):S345-S351.

39. O'Neill JF, Deakin CD. Do we hyperventilate cardiac arrest patients? Resuscitation. 2007;73(1):82-85.

40. Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krumholz HM, et al. Consequences of inadequate sign-out for patient care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):1755-1760.

41. Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R, et al. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(19):1803-1812.

42. Jabre P, Belpomme V, Azoulay E, et al. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(11):1008-1018.

43. Jabre P, Tazarourte K, Azoulay E, et al. Offering the opportunity for family to be present during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 1-year assessment. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(7):981-987.

44. Robinson SM, Mackenzie-Ross S, Campbell Hewson GL, et al. Psychological effect of witnessed resuscitation on bereaved relatives. Lancet. 1998;352(9128):614-617.

45. Compton S, Levy P, Griffin M, et al. Family-witnessed resuscitation: bereavement outcomes in an urban environment. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(6):715-721.

46. Twibell RS, Siela D, Riwitis C, et al. A qualitative study of factors in nurses' and physicians' decision-making related to family presence during resuscitation. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(1-2):e320-e334.

47. Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S366-S468.

48. Porter J, Cooper SJ, Sellick K. Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR): perceived benefits, barriers and enablers to implementation and practice. Int Emerg Nurs. 2013;21(1):69-74.

49. Fernandez R, Compton S, Jones KA, Velilla MA. The presence of a family witness impacts physician performance during simulated medical codes. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(6):1956-1960.

50. Härgestam M, Lindkvist M, Brulin C, et al. Communication in interdisciplinary teams: exploring closed-loop communication during in situ trauma team training. BMJ Open. 2013;3(10):e003525.

51. Sutcliffe KM, Lewton E, Rosenthal MM. Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Acad Med. 2004;79(2):186-194.

52. Hightower D, Thomas SH, Stone CK, et al. Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(3):300-303.

53. Fernandez Castelao E, Russo SG, Cremer S, et al. Positive impact of crisis resource management training on no-flow time and team member verbalisations during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled trial. Resuscitation. 2011;82(10):1338-1343.

54. Levine RL, Wayne MA, Miller CC. End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(5):301-306.

55. Kilgannon JH, Jones AE, Shapiro NI, et al. Association between arterial hyperoxia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest and in-hospital mortality. JAMA. 2010;303(21):2165-2171.

56. Krumholz A, Stern BJ, Weiss HD. Outcome from coma after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: relation to seizures and myoclonus. Neurology. 1988;38(3):401-405.

---

Summary Box: Key Takeaways for the Busy Clinician

U-LAP for PEA

• Ultrasound first (look for tamponade, PE, empty heart)
• Loss of volume/tension pneumo (treat empirically if suspected)
• Acidosis/electrolytes (bicarb if pH <7.1; calcium for hyperK)
• PE (tPA + extended CPR if suspected)

Communication Hack

"Code [location], cardiac arrest, need [drug] for [indication], weight [X kg], tube system now—EMR order in 5 minutes"

Airway Without Stopping Compressions

• BVM is acceptable for first 6-10 minutes
• Video laryngoscopy with bougie—pause only for bougie passage
• Consider SGA for difficult airways or inexperienced operators
• Ventilate 10 breaths/minute (use metronome)

POST Handoff

• Patient & presentation
• Optimization & interventions (DOPE: Downtime, Output, Procedures, Etiology)
• Subsequent tasks (4 C's: Catheterization, Cooling, CT, Consults)
• Transfer accepted (closed-loop confirmation)

Family Presence

• Offer proactively (increases satisfaction, decreases PTSD)
• Assign dedicated liaison (not involved in patient care)
• Position at foot of bed
• Narrate continuously in lay terms
• Include in hot debrief if desired

---

Suggested Further Reading

1. Soar J, Böttiger BW, Carli P, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2021;161:115-151.

   • Comprehensive European perspective on ACLS with nuanced differences from AHA guidelines

2. Merchant RM, Topjian AA, Panchal AR, et al. Part 1: Executive Summary: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S337-S357.

   • Essential reading for understanding the evidence base behind current ACLS recommendations

3. Atkins DL, Sasson C, Hsu A, et al. 2022 Interim Guidance to Healthcare Providers for Basic and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022;15(5):e008900.

   • Important modifications for resuscitation during infectious disease outbreaks

4. Nolan JP, Sandroni C, Böttiger BW, et al. European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(4):369-421.

   • Comprehensive review of post-cardiac arrest syndrome management

5. Edelson DP, Yuen TC, Mancini ME, et al. Hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation practice in the United States: a nationally representative survey. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(6):353-357.

   • Eye-opening data on real-world resuscitation practice variation

6. Long B, Gottlieb M, Koyfman A. Evaluation and management of the cardiac arrest patient presenting with an initial non-shockable rhythm. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(11):2474-2485.

   • Excellent practical review focused specifically on PEA/asystole management

---

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the countless resuscitation teams whose dedication to excellence in cardiac arrest care inspired this work. Special acknowledgment to the simulation educators who help us practice these skills in controlled environments before lives depend on them.

---

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.

---

Author Contributions

This manuscript represents a synthesis of published literature, expert consensus, and clinical experience from multiple contributors in critical care medicine, emergency medicine, and resuscitation science.

---

Word Count: 8,947 words (excluding references and tables)

Final Thoughts: The Art and Science of Resuscitation

As you progress through your critical care training, remember that every code blue is simultaneously a test of your medical knowledge, technical skills, leadership ability, and humanity. The algorithms provide the structure, but your judgment, composure, and compassion determine the outcome.

The "hacks" presented here aren't shortcuts—they're the crystallized wisdom of thousands of resuscitations, distilled into actionable strategies that can make the difference between life and death. Practice them in simulation, implement them in real codes, and most importantly, never stop learning from each resuscitation attempt.

When you walk into a code blue, you're entering one of the highest-stakes moments in all of medicine. The patient's life hangs in the balance, the family's future will be forever changed, and your team is looking to you for leadership. There's no room for ego, hesitation, or chaos—only systematic excellence.

Master these techniques. Lead with confidence. Never forget the human being beneath the algorithm.

Your next code starts now.