Acid-Base Chemistry: The Stewart Approach for Complex Derangements

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Traditional approaches to acid-base disorders, based on the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation and the anion gap, often fail to provide mechanistic insights into complex metabolic derangements encountered in critically ill patients. The Stewart approach, also known as the physicochemical approach, offers a comprehensive understanding by recognizing that hydrogen ion concentration is determined by three independent variables: partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO₂), strong ion difference (SID), and total weak acids (Aᵗₒₜ). This review explores the fundamental principles of the Stewart approach, elucidates the concept of the strong ion gap (SIG) in detecting unmeasured anions, and demonstrates clinical applications in diagnosing and managing mixed acid-base disorders that traditional methods may overlook.

Introduction

Acid-base physiology remains one of the most challenging concepts in critical care medicine. While the traditional bicarbonate-centered approach has served clinicians for decades, it often provides incomplete explanations for complex metabolic derangements. In 1983, Peter Stewart revolutionized our understanding by proposing that pH is not directly regulated by bicarbonate but is instead determined by three independent variables through physicochemical principles.¹

The Stewart approach is particularly valuable in intensive care settings where patients frequently present with multifactorial acid-base disturbances—sepsis with lactic acidosis, renal dysfunction, hyperchloremic states, and hypoalbuminemia often coexist, creating diagnostic conundrums that the anion gap alone cannot unravel.²,³ Understanding Stewart's methodology empowers clinicians to identify the precise etiology of acid-base disorders and tailor therapeutic interventions accordingly.

Pearl #1: The Stewart approach doesn't replace traditional methods—it complements them by providing mechanistic clarity. Think of it as looking under the hood of the engine rather than just reading the dashboard.

The Three Independent Variables: pCO₂, Strong Ion Difference (SID), and Total Weak Acids (Aᵗₒₜ)

Fundamental Principles

Stewart's approach is grounded in three fundamental principles:

1. Electroneutrality: The sum of all positive charges must equal the sum of all negative charges
2. Conservation of mass: The total amount of a substance remains constant unless added or removed
3. Dissociation equilibria: Governed by dissociation constants for water and weak acids

From these principles, Stewart demonstrated that only three independent variables determine hydrogen ion concentration in biological fluids:⁴,⁵

1. Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (pCO₂)

The pCO₂ represents the respiratory component of acid-base balance. Carbon dioxide dissolved in plasma forms carbonic acid (H₂CO₃), which dissociates to produce hydrogen ions:

CO₂ + H₂O ⇌ H₂CO₃ ⇌ H⁺ + HCO₃⁻

Normal range: 35-45 mmHg

Increased pCO₂ (respiratory acidosis) elevates hydrogen ion concentration, while decreased pCO₂ (respiratory alkalosis) reduces it. This variable is rapidly modifiable through ventilation, making it the body's first line of pH defense.

Hack #1: In mechanically ventilated patients, a pCO₂ of 40 mmHg doesn't necessarily mean "normal ventilation"—it might represent compensation for metabolic alkalosis or inappropriately high ventilation in metabolic acidosis. Always assess in context.

2. Strong Ion Difference (SID)

The SID represents the difference between fully dissociated cations and anions—ions that remain completely ionized at physiological pH.

Strong cations: Na⁺, K⁺, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺ Strong anions: Cl⁻, lactate⁻, SO₄²⁻, urate⁻

SID = ([Na⁺] + [K⁺] + [Ca²⁺] + [Mg²⁺]) - ([Cl⁻] + [lactate⁻] + [other strong anions])

For practical purposes, the apparent SID (SIDa) is calculated as:

SIDa = [Na⁺] + [K⁺] + [Ca²⁺] + [Mg²⁺] - [Cl⁻] - [lactate⁻]

Normal SIDa: 40-42 mEq/L

The SID must be balanced by weak acids (primarily albumin and phosphate) and bicarbonate. When SID increases (more positive), the solution becomes more alkaline; when SID decreases (less positive), acidosis results.⁶

Understanding the mechanism: A positive SID creates an electrical imbalance that must be balanced by increased dissociation of water (generating OH⁻, which consumes H⁺) and weak acids, thereby affecting pH.

3. Total Weak Acids (Aᵗₒₜ)

Weak acids are partially dissociated at physiological pH. In plasma, the two most significant weak acids are:

• Albumin (contributing approximately 75% of Aᵗₒₜ)
• Phosphate (contributing approximately 25% of Aᵗₒ₵)

Aᵗₒₜ = [Albumin] + [Phosphate]

Normal Aᵗₒₜ: Approximately 18-20 mEq/L (primarily determined by albumin of 4.0-4.5 g/dL)

Weak acids act as buffers and also carry negative charges. An increase in Aᵗₒₜ (hyperalbuminemia, hyperphosphatemia) creates acidosis, while a decrease (hypoalbuminemia, hypophosphatemia) creates alkalosis.⁷,⁸

Pearl #2: Hypoalbuminemia is one of the most commonly overlooked causes of alkalosis in critically ill patients. A patient with albumin of 2.0 g/dL has a "hidden" alkalosis of approximately 3-4 mEq/L.

Oyster #1: Calculating the expected bicarbonate for a given albumin level helps unmask hidden acidosis. Use this formula: Expected HCO₃⁻ increase = 3.7 × (4.5 - measured albumin in g/dL).

Understanding Strong Ion Gap (SIG): Detecting Unmeasured Anions in Complex Metabolic Acidoses

Concept of Effective Strong Ion Difference

The effective SID (SIDe) represents the measured charges from weak acids and bicarbonate that balance the SID:

SIDe = [HCO₃⁻] + [Albumin charge] + [Phosphate charge]

Using simplified equations:

• Albumin charge (mEq/L) = Albumin (g/dL) × 2.8
• Phosphate charge (mEq/L) = Phosphate (mg/dL) × 0.58

SIDe = [HCO₃⁻] + (Albumin × 2.8) + (Phosphate × 0.58)

Normal SIDe: 40-42 mEq/L

Defining the Strong Ion Gap

The strong ion gap (SIG) represents the difference between the apparent and effective SID:

SIG = SIDa - SIDe

Normal SIG: 0 ± 2 mEq/L

A positive SIG indicates the presence of unmeasured anions, such as:

• Lactate (if not measured separately)
• Ketoacids (β-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate)
• Uremic acids (in renal failure)
• Salicylates
• Toxic alcohols metabolites (glycolate, formate)
• D-lactate (in short bowel syndrome)
• 5-oxoproline (pyroglutamic acid, often from chronic acetaminophen use)
• Propylene glycol (from intravenous medications)⁹,¹⁰

Hack #2: The SIG is essentially a "corrected" anion gap that accounts for albumin and phosphate. It's more sensitive than the traditional anion gap for detecting unmeasured anions.

Clinical Significance

The SIG provides several advantages over the traditional anion gap:

1. Albumin correction is built-in: The traditional anion gap must be corrected for albumin (expected increase of 2.5 mEq/L for each 1 g/dL decrease in albumin below 4 g/dL), but this correction is often forgotten or imprecise.

2. Phosphate consideration: Traditional anion gap ignores phosphate, which can significantly affect acid-base status in renal failure or refeeding syndrome.

3. Quantification of unmeasured anions: SIG provides a direct measure of unmeasured anion concentration.¹¹,¹²

Pearl #3: In a patient with sepsis, hypoalbuminemia, and lactic acidosis, a "normal" anion gap of 14 mEq/L might actually represent significant unmeasured anion accumulation when corrected using Stewart methodology.

SIG in Specific Clinical Scenarios

Sepsis: Elevated SIG helps identify occult tissue hypoperfusion even when lactate is clearing. Persistently elevated SIG despite lactate normalization may indicate other unmeasured anions and predict worse outcomes.¹³

Renal failure: SIG distinguishes between acidosis from uremic anions versus hyperchloremia from reduced ammonium excretion.

Diabetic ketoacidosis: SIG quantifies ketoacid burden and helps monitor treatment response, particularly when β-hydroxybutyrate assays aren't readily available.

Toxicology: Elevated SIG with normal lactate should prompt investigation for toxic alcohol ingestion, salicylate poisoning, or propylene glycol toxicity.¹⁴

Oyster #2: A negative SIG (SIDa < SIDe) suggests laboratory error, unmeasured cations (lithium, immunoglobulins in multiple myeloma), or hypercalcemia/hypermagnesemia not accounted for in your calculation.

Clinical Application: Using the Stewart Method to Diagnose and Manage Mixed Acid-Base Disorders That the Traditional Approach Misses

Systematic Approach to Stewart Analysis

A stepwise approach facilitates clinical application:

Step 1: Assess the respiratory component

• Evaluate pCO₂ (normal: 35-45 mmHg)
• Determine if respiratory acidosis, alkalosis, or appropriate compensation exists

Step 2: Calculate SIDa

• SIDa = ([Na⁺] + [K⁺]) - [Cl⁻] - [Lactate⁻]
• Normal: 40-42 mEq/L
• Simplified version: (Na⁺ - Cl⁻) - lactate typically approximates 38-40 mEq/L

Step 3: Calculate SIDe

• SIDe = [HCO₃⁻] + (Albumin × 2.8) + (Phosphate × 0.58)
• Normal: 40-42 mEq/L

Step 4: Calculate SIG

• SIG = SIDa - SIDe
• Normal: 0 ± 2 mEq/L

Step 5: Interpret

• Low SIDa → Metabolic acidosis from strong ions (hyperchloremia, lactate, exogenous acids)
• High SIDa → Metabolic alkalosis from strong ions (hypochloremia, sodium loading)
• High Aᵗₒₜ → Acidosis from weak acids (hyperalbuminemia, hyperphosphatemia)
• Low Aᵗₒₜ → Alkalosis from weak acids (hypoalbuminemia, hypophosphatemia)
• Positive SIG → Unmeasured anions present¹⁵,¹⁶

Case-Based Applications

Case 1: Unmasking Hidden Acidosis in Sepsis

A 68-year-old septic patient:

• pH 7.38, pCO₂ 38 mmHg, HCO₃⁻ 22 mEq/L
• Na⁺ 138, K⁺ 4.0, Cl⁻ 105, Lactate 2.0 mEq/L
• Albumin 2.0 g/dL, Phosphate 2.5 mg/dL

Traditional interpretation: Mild metabolic acidosis with normal anion gap (12 mEq/L)

Stewart analysis:

• SIDa = (138 + 4.0) - 105 - 2 = 35 mEq/L (decreased)
• SIDe = 22 + (2.0 × 2.8) + (2.5 × 0.58) = 29.0 mEq/L
• SIG = 35 - 29 = +6 mEq/L (elevated)
• Expected HCO₃⁻ for albumin 2.0 g/dL: 22 + 3.7 × (4.5 - 2.0) = 31.3 mEq/L

Stewart interpretation: Triple disorder:

1. Metabolic alkalosis from hypoalbuminemia (masked)
2. Hyperchloremic acidosis (low SIDa)
3. High anion gap acidosis from unmeasured anions (positive SIG, likely ketoacids or uremic toxins given clearing lactate)

Management implications: Avoid chloride-containing fluids; investigate source of unmeasured anions; don't be reassured by "normal" pH.

Hack #3: In resuscitation, calculate the "chloride-sodium difference" (Na⁺ - Cl⁻). Normal is 32-38. A difference <30 suggests hyperchloremic acidosis, often iatrogenic from aggressive normal saline resuscitation.

Case 2: Distinguishing Renal from GI Losses

A 55-year-old with chronic diarrhea:

• pH 7.32, pCO₂ 32 mmHg, HCO₃⁻ 16 mEq/L
• Na⁺ 140, K⁺ 2.8, Cl⁻ 118
• Albumin 4.0 g/dL, Phosphate 3.0 mg/dL

Traditional interpretation: Non-anion gap metabolic acidosis with respiratory compensation

Stewart analysis:

• SIDa = (140 + 2.8) - 118 = 24.8 mEq/L (markedly decreased)
• SIDe = 16 + (4.0 × 2.8) + (3.0 × 0.58) = 28.9 mEq/L
• SIG = 24.8 - 28.9 = -4.1 mEq/L (negative)

Stewart interpretation: Severe hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis with low SIDa, consistent with GI bicarbonate losses (diarrhea). The negative SIG might suggest laboratory error or the need to remeasure electrolytes.

Management implications: Treat underlying diarrhea; provide potassium supplementation; consider balanced crystalloid solutions rather than normal saline which would worsen hyperchloremia.

Case 3: Post-Cardiac Arrest with Multiple Derangements

A 72-year-old post-cardiac arrest:

• pH 7.15, pCO₂ 48 mmHg, HCO₃⁻ 16 mEq/L
• Na⁺ 145, K⁺ 5.5, Cl⁻ 110, Lactate 8.0 mEq/L
• Albumin 2.5 g/dL, Phosphate 5.5 mg/dL, Creatinine 2.8 mg/dL

Traditional interpretation: Mixed metabolic and respiratory acidosis with elevated anion gap

Stewart analysis:

• SIDa = (145 + 5.5) - 110 - 8 = 32.5 mEq/L (decreased)
• SIDe = 16 + (2.5 × 2.8) + (5.5 × 0.58) = 26.2 mEq/L
• SIG = 32.5 - 26.2 = +6.3 mEq/L (elevated)
• Expected HCO₃⁻ for albumin 2.5: 16 + 3.7 × (4.5 - 2.5) = 23.4 mEq/L

Stewart interpretation: Quadruple disorder:

1. Respiratory acidosis (pCO₂ 48 mmHg, inadequate ventilation)
2. Lactic acidosis (lactate 8.0)
3. Unmeasured anion acidosis (SIG +6.3, likely uremic acids given renal dysfunction)
4. Masked alkalosis from hypoalbuminemia
5. Acidosis from hyperphosphatemia (elevated Aᵗₒₜ)

Management implications:

• Optimize ventilation immediately
• Source control for shock and tissue hypoperfusion
• Consider renal replacement therapy for uremic toxins and hyperphosphatemia
• Avoid aggressive bicarbonate therapy—correct underlying pathophysiology
• Recognition that patient is more acidotic than pH suggests due to masked alkalosis¹⁷

Pearl #4: The Stewart approach excels in post-resuscitation care where multiple acid-base derangements coexist. It helps prioritize interventions: ventilation for pCO₂, perfusion for lactate, and RRT for unmeasured anions and phosphate.

Therapeutic Applications

Fluid Resuscitation Strategy

The Stewart approach fundamentally changes fluid selection:

Normal saline (0.9% NaCl):

• SID = 0 (154 mEq/L Na⁺ and 154 mEq/L Cl⁻)
• Creates hyperchloremic acidosis by diluting SIDa¹⁸

Balanced crystalloids (Lactated Ringer's, Plasma-Lyte):

• SID = 27-28 mEq/L
• Better preserves physiological SID
• Reduces risk of hyperchloremic acidosis¹⁹,²⁰

Oyster #3: Large-volume normal saline resuscitation can decrease SIDa by 5-10 mEq/L, causing iatrogenic acidosis that may be mistaken for worsening disease. Use balanced crystalloids when possible.

Bicarbonate Therapy Decision-Making

Stewart analysis clarifies when bicarbonate therapy is appropriate:

Appropriate:

• True metabolic acidosis from decreased SIDa with low SIDe
• Life-threatening acidemia (pH <7.1) refractory to other measures

Inappropriate:

• Lactic acidosis (address tissue perfusion instead)
• Hyperchloremic acidosis (restrict chloride instead)
• Acidosis masked by alkalosis from hypoalbuminemia²¹

Hack #4: If you must give bicarbonate, calculate the "base deficit" using Stewart: Base deficit ≈ (40 - SIDa) + (Normal Aᵗₒₜ - Actual Aᵗₒₜ). This provides a more accurate target than traditional base excess.

Renal Replacement Therapy Prescription

Stewart analysis guides dialysate selection:

• High SIG suggests need for convective clearance of unmeasured anions
• Hyperchloremic component responds to diffusive therapy with lactate- or bicarbonate-buffered dialysate
• Phosphate removal helps reduce Aᵗₒₜ-mediated acidosis²²,²³

Limitations and Pitfalls

Despite its advantages, the Stewart approach has limitations:

1. Complexity: Requires multiple calculations, limiting bedside applicability
2. Laboratory variability: Small measurement errors propagate through calculations
3. Unmeasured ions: The approach assumes all significant ions are measured
4. Time-intensive: Not practical for rapid decision-making in emergencies
5. Limited software support: Few blood gas analyzers incorporate Stewart parameters²⁴

Pearl #5: Don't abandon traditional methods—use Stewart analysis for complex cases that don't fit usual patterns or when therapeutic interventions aren't producing expected results.

Conclusion

The Stewart approach provides a mechanistic framework for understanding acid-base physiology that transcends the limitations of traditional bicarbonate-centered methods. By recognizing that pH is determined by three independent variables—pCO₂, SID, and Aᵗₒₜ—clinicians can dissect complex metabolic derangements with precision. The strong ion gap serves as a sensitive detector of unmeasured anions, often revealing pathology that traditional anion gap analysis misses.

In the modern ICU, where patients present with multifactorial acid-base disturbances, the Stewart approach is invaluable for:

• Identifying all components of mixed disorders
• Guiding fluid resuscitation strategies
• Determining appropriateness of bicarbonate therapy
• Optimizing renal replacement therapy
• Understanding the full metabolic picture in sepsis, trauma, and post-resuscitation states

While the Stewart approach is more complex and time-intensive than traditional methods, it offers unparalleled diagnostic and therapeutic insights for critically ill patients. As bedside clinicians become more familiar with these concepts and as electronic medical records incorporate automated calculations, the Stewart approach will increasingly become standard practice in critical care medicine.

The journey from Henderson-Hasselbalch to Stewart represents not a replacement but an evolution—a deeper understanding that empowers intensivists to see beyond the numbers and truly comprehend the physicochemical chaos occurring in their sickest patients.

Final Pearl: Master both approaches. Use the traditional method for rapid assessment and communication with colleagues. Deploy Stewart analysis when you need to understand the "why" and the "how" of complex acid-base derangements—that's when it truly shines.

---

References

1. Stewart PA. Modern quantitative acid-base chemistry. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1983;61(12):1444-1461.

2. Kellum JA. Determinants of blood pH in health and disease. Crit Care. 2000;4(1):6-14.

3. Constable PD. A simplified strong ion model for acid-base equilibria: application to horse plasma. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83(1):297-311.

4. Fencl V, Jabor A, Kazda A, Figge J. Diagnosis of metabolic acid-base disturbances in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(6):2246-2251.

5. Sirker AA, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. Acid-base physiology: the 'traditional' and the 'modern' approaches. Anaesthesia. 2002;57(4):348-356.

6. Gilfix BM, Bique M, Magder S. A physical chemical approach to the analysis of acid-base balance in the clinical setting. J Crit Care. 1993;8(4):187-197.

7. Figge J, Mydosh T, Fencl V. Serum proteins and acid-base equilibria: a follow-up. J Lab Clin Med. 1992;120(5):713-719.

8. Kellum JA, Kramer DJ, Pinsky MR. Strong ion gap: a methodology for exploring unexplained anions. J Crit Care. 1995;10(2):51-55.

9. Moviat M, van Haren F, van der Hoeven H. Conventional or physicochemical approach in intensive care unit patients with metabolic acidosis. Crit Care. 2003;7(3):R41-R45.

10. Kaplan LJ, Kellum JA. Initial pH, base deficit, lactate, anion gap, strong ion difference, and strong ion gap predict outcome from major vascular injury. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(5):1120-1124.

11. Dondorp AM, Chau TT, Phu NH, et al. Unidentified acids of strong prognostic significance in severe malaria. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(8):1683-1688.

12. Rocktaschel J, Morimatsu H, Uchino S, Bellomo R. Unmeasured anions in critically ill patients: can they predict mortality? Crit Care Med. 2003;31(8):2131-2136.

13. Dubin A, Menises MM, Masevicius FD, et al. Comparison of three different methods of evaluation of metabolic acid-base disorders. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5):1264-1270.

14. Berend K, de Vries AP, Gans RO. Physiological approach to assessment of acid-base disturbances. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(15):1434-1445.

15. Story DA, Morimatsu H, Bellomo R. Strong ions, weak acids and base excess: a simplified Fencl-Stewart approach to clinical acid-base disorders. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(1):54-60.

16. Kellum JA. Clinical review: reunification of acid-base physiology. Crit Care. 2005;9(5):500-507.

17. Rehm M, Finsterer U. Treating intraoperative hyperchloremic acidosis with sodium bicarbonate or tris-hydroxymethyl aminomethane: a randomized prospective study. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(4):1201-1208.

18. Scheingraber S, Rehm M, Sehmisch C, Finsterer U. Rapid saline infusion produces hyperchloremic acidosis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999;90(5):1265-1270.

19. Yunos NM, Bellomo R, Hegarty C, et al. Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA. 2012;308(15):1566-1572.

20. Self WH, Semler MW, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in noncritically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):819-828.

21. Forsythe SM, Schmidt GA. Sodium bicarbonate for the treatment of lactic acidosis. Chest. 2000;117(1):260-267.

22. Naka T, Bellomo R. Bench-to-bedside review: treating acid-base abnormalities in the intensive care unit - the role of renal replacement therapy. Crit Care. 2004;8(2):108-114.

23. Moviat M, Pickkers P, van der Voort PH, van der Hoeven JG. Acetazolamide-mediated decrease in strong ion difference accounts for the correction of metabolic alkalosis in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2006;10(1):R14.

24. Morgan TJ. The Stewart approach--one clinician's perspective. Clin Biochem Rev. 2009;30(2):41-54.