Monday, November 3, 2025

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the Abdomen and Pelvis in the ICU

 

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the Abdomen and Pelvis in the ICU: A Practical Guide for the Critical Care Physician

Dr Neeraj manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has revolutionized critical care practice by enabling real-time bedside evaluation of acutely ill patients. Abdominal and pelvic POCUS provides rapid diagnostic information that guides immediate therapeutic decisions, reduces time to intervention, and minimizes patient transport risks. This review examines the clinical applications of abdominal-pelvic POCUS in the intensive care unit, emphasizing practical techniques, diagnostic pitfalls, and evidence-based approaches to common critical care scenarios.

Introduction

The integration of POCUS into critical care practice represents a paradigm shift from traditional "see and treat" to "see, scan, and treat" medicine. Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound performed by intensivists offers immediate answers to time-sensitive clinical questions without the delays, radiation exposure, or logistical challenges of computed tomography (CT). Studies demonstrate that goal-directed POCUS by trained intensivists achieves diagnostic accuracy comparable to formal radiology studies while significantly reducing time to diagnosis and intervention.¹

The American College of Emergency Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine have recognized abdominal POCUS as a core competency for critical care physicians.² This review provides a comprehensive, practical approach to abdominal-pelvic POCUS applications most relevant to ICU practice.

Rapid Assessment for the Acute Abdomen: Differentiating Surgical from Medical Causes

Clinical Context

The acute abdomen in critically ill patients presents unique diagnostic challenges. Obtunded patients cannot provide reliable history, physical examination findings are often masked by sedation or analgesia, and laboratory markers may be nonspecific. POCUS provides objective anatomical information that helps differentiate surgical emergencies requiring immediate intervention from medical conditions managed conservatively.

FAST-Plus Examination

The Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (E-FAST) forms the foundation for acute abdomen evaluation. The standard FAST views (perihepatic, perisplenic, pelvic, and pericardial) detect free fluid, while additional views assess for pneumothorax and gross bowel pathology.³

Pearl: In the supine patient, free fluid gravitates to Morrison's pouch (hepatorenal recess) and the pelvis first. As little as 250-500 mL can be detected in these dependent spaces, while 700-1000 mL is needed for visualization in the splenorenal recess.⁴

Oyster: Not all free fluid indicates surgical pathology. Critically ill patients commonly accumulate ascites from third-spacing, hypoalbuminemia, or fluid resuscitation. Look for echogenic debris, septations, or loculations suggesting infected or hemorrhagic fluid. Simple anechoic free fluid in a hemodynamically stable patient without peritonitis warrants conservative management.

Bowel Assessment

Ultrasound can identify several surgical emergencies:

Small Bowel Obstruction (SBO): Dilated fluid-filled bowel loops (>2.5 cm diameter) with active to-and-fro peristalsis proximally and collapsed bowel distally. The "keyboard sign" (valvulae conniventes spanning the entire bowel diameter) distinguishes small from large bowel. Free fluid between loops suggests ischemia.⁵

Bowel Ischemia: Absent peristalsis, bowel wall thickening (>4 mm), loss of wall layering, free fluid, and absent Doppler flow in the bowel wall are concerning features. However, sensitivity is limited—clinical suspicion warrants immediate CT angiography or surgical consultation.⁶

Pneumoperitoneum: Free air appears as echogenic foci with reverberation artifacts in the peritoneal cavity. Sensitivity is lower than CT but sufficient to prompt urgent surgical evaluation in the appropriate clinical context.

Hack: Use the "sliding lung sign" to differentiate pneumothorax from pneumoperitoneum. In pneumoperitoneum, scan the right upper quadrant and look for hyperechoic foci that move independently of respiratory motion, unlike pneumothorax where air-artifact relationship to pleura is fixed.

Cholecystitis

Ultrasound findings include gallbladder wall thickening (>3-4 mm), pericholecystic fluid, stones, sludge, and sonographic Murphy's sign. However, in sedated ICU patients, acalculous cholecystitis—a surgical emergency with 30% mortality—is more common than calculous disease. Ultrasound sensitivity for acalculous cholecystitis is only 50-90%, making clinical correlation essential.⁷

Pearl: The "WES" criteria (wall thickening >3.5 mm, edema, and stranding) combined with intramural gas or sloughed mucosa increase specificity for gangrenous cholecystitis requiring emergent cholecystectomy.⁸

Renal POCUS: Assessing for Obstruction and Differentiating Types of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

Hydronephrosis Detection

Renal ultrasound rapidly differentiates obstructive from non-obstructive AKI—a critical distinction since post-renal obstruction requires urgent decompression. Hydronephrosis sensitivity approaches 90-95% when moderate to severe.⁹

Technique: Position the patient supine or in lateral decubitus position. Using a curvilinear (2-5 MHz) probe, identify each kidney in the coronal plane along the posterior axillary line. The kidney appears as a hyperechoic rim (cortex) surrounding hypoechoic medullary pyramids and central echogenic sinus fat.

Hydronephrosis appears as anechoic fluid-filled calyces separating sinus echoes—the "splittering" or "bear paw" sign. Grade severity as mild (calyceal dilation only), moderate (pelvic dilation with preserved parenchyma), or severe (marked pelvicalyceal dilation with cortical thinning).¹⁰

Oyster: Early acute obstruction (<24 hours) may not show hydronephrosis, particularly in dehydrated patients or those with retroperitoneal fibrosis encasing the collecting system. Ureteral jets—visible color Doppler flow from ureteral orifices into the bladder—suggest patency, though absence doesn't confirm obstruction since jets are intermittent.

Pearl: Check for bilateral hydronephrosis, which suggests bladder outlet obstruction (most common), retroperitoneal process, or neurogenic bladder. Unilateral hydronephrosis with a solitary or transplanted kidney is functionally equivalent to bilateral disease—urgent decompression is required.

Differentiating AKI Etiologies

While ultrasound cannot definitively diagnose AKI etiology, several findings provide clues:

Prerenal/ATN: Normal-sized kidneys (9-12 cm length) with preserved corticomedullary differentiation and no hydronephrosis. Increased resistive index (RI >0.70) on Doppler suggests prerenal physiology or evolving acute tubular necrosis, though this is nonspecific.¹¹

Chronic Kidney Disease: Small kidneys (<9 cm), increased cortical echogenicity (equal to or greater than liver), loss of corticomedullary differentiation, and cortical thinning. This finding suggests chronic rather than acute pathology.

Renal Vein Thrombosis: Enlarged kidney with loss of sinus echoes, reversed diastolic flow on arterial Doppler, and absent venous Doppler signals. Consider in hypercoagulable patients with acute kidney dysfunction.¹²

Hack: The "liver-kidney contrast" sign helps assess cortical echogenicity. Normally, renal cortex is hypoechoic relative to liver parenchyma. When cortical echogenicity equals or exceeds liver, chronic kidney disease is likely. Compare at the same depth to control for gain settings.

Bladder Scanning and Volume Assessment

Clinical Applications

Bladder ultrasound assesses post-void residuals, guides catheter placement, and evaluates for urinary retention—a common cause of agitation and hemodynamic instability in ICU patients. Post-void residual >200 mL suggests incomplete emptying; >400 mL indicates significant retention requiring catheterization.¹³

Technique

Using a curvilinear probe with the indicator toward the patient's head, place the transducer suprapubically in the midline, angling caudally. The bladder appears as an anechoic triangular or teardrop structure. Measure maximum diameter in three orthogonal planes (transverse, sagittal, and anteroposterior depth).

Volume calculation: Multiple formulas exist. The most accurate for non-spherical bladders is: Volume (mL) = Length × Width × Height × 0.75 (correction factor)

Automated bladder scanners use similar principles but may be inaccurate with volumes <50 mL or >999 mL, ascites, obesity, or pelvic masses.¹⁴

Pearl: Visualize the bladder in both transverse and sagittal planes to avoid mistaking fluid-filled loops of bowel, uterus, ovarian cysts, or pelvic hematomas for the bladder. The bladder changes shape with compression and should have smooth walls without peristalsis.

Oyster: Foley catheter balloons can cast acoustic shadows mimicking stones or masses. Deflate the balloon if uncertainty exists. Additionally, clotted blood in the bladder can appear echogenic and may be mistaken for solid tissue—clinical context is essential.

Catheter Placement Guidance

Difficult urethral catheterization (obesity, prior surgery, strictures) benefits from ultrasound guidance. Visualize the empty bladder and advance the catheter under direct visualization, confirming intraluminal position before inflating the balloon. This reduces urethral trauma and false passage formation.¹⁵

Diagnosing Intra-Abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

Pathophysiology and Significance

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH, pressure >12 mmHg) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS, sustained pressure >20 mmHg with new organ dysfunction) complicate 30-40% of critically ill patients, with mortality exceeding 50% when unrecognized. While bladder pressure measurement remains the gold standard for diagnosis, ultrasound provides complementary anatomical assessment and can suggest elevated pressures before invasive measurement.¹⁶

Ultrasound Findings

Direct Measurements: Several ultrasound techniques estimate intra-abdominal pressure (IAP):

  1. Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Assessment: Increased IAP compresses the IVC, reducing its diameter and respiratory variation. An IVC diameter <1 cm with minimal (<15%) respiratory variation suggests elevated IAP.¹⁷

  2. Portal Vein Pulsatility Index: Calculated as (peak velocity - minimum velocity) / peak velocity. Values >0.5 correlate with IAP >15 mmHg, though specificity is limited.¹⁸

  3. Renal Vein Doppler: Monophasic renal venous waveforms (loss of normal phasicity) suggest elevated central venous pressure from IAH. Compare with baseline studies when available.

Indirect Findings: Ultrasound reveals end-organ effects of ACS:

  • Kidneys: Increased renal parenchymal and capsular thickness, increased resistive indices (>0.7-0.8), and development of hydronephrosis from extrinsic ureteral compression
  • Bowel: Wall thickening, hyperechoic mesentery, and decreased peristalsis
  • Liver: Hepatomegaly and heterogeneous echotexture from congestion
  • Cardiac: Compressed cardiac chambers with reduced filling¹⁹

Pearl: The "abdominal wall thickness ratio" compares subcutaneous tissue thickness at the linea alba to lateral abdominal wall thickness. Ratios >0.7 correlate with IAP >15 mmHg in mechanically ventilated patients.²⁰

Oyster: Ultrasound cannot replace bladder pressure measurement for definitive IAH/ACS diagnosis. However, it identifies at-risk patients requiring invasive monitoring and assesses response to decompressive interventions. Ultrasound findings resolve rapidly after successful decompression.

Hack: When ACS is suspected, perform a rapid sequential examination: IVC (compression?), kidneys (increased RI?), bowel (edematous?), and cardiac windows (compressed RV?). The constellation of findings across multiple organ systems increases diagnostic confidence and supports the decision for surgical decompression.

Guiding Paracentesis and Percutaneous Nephrostomy Tube Placement

Ultrasound-Guided Paracentesis

Paracentesis is performed diagnostically (suspected spontaneous bacterial peritonitis) or therapeutically (tense ascites compromising respiratory or cardiovascular function). Ultrasound guidance reduces complications including bowel perforation (from 1-2% to <0.1%), bleeding, and dry taps.²¹

Technique:

  1. Preprocedural Scanning: Identify optimal site with adequate fluid depth (>3 cm reduces visceral injury risk), avoiding bowel, bladder, inferior epigastric vessels, and old surgical scars. Mark the site with the patient in the position they'll maintain during the procedure.

  2. Vessel Identification: Use color Doppler to map superficial and deep vessels, particularly the inferior epigastric artery running along the lateral rectus sheath.

  3. Approach: Static (mark site, then perform procedure without ultrasound) versus dynamic (real-time visualization during needle insertion). Static marking is usually sufficient for simple ascites; dynamic guidance is preferred for loculated or small-volume collections.

  4. Recommended Sites: Left or right lower quadrant lateral to rectus (avoiding epigastric vessels), at least 5 cm from old scars. Avoid midline below umbilicus due to bowel.²²

Pearl: The Z-track technique—inserting the needle at an angle while applying lateral skin traction—creates a self-sealing tract that reduces post-procedure leakage. This is particularly useful in patients with refractory ascites or coagulopathy where prolonged leakage is common.

Oyster: "Adequate" fluid depth varies by patient body habitus and collection characteristics. In obese patients, 3 cm may be insufficient to confidently avoid anterior abdominal wall structures. Loculated or posterior collections may require deeper access. Adjust your assessment based on individual anatomy.

Hack: When encountering tenacious or loculated ascites that won't flow, inject 10-20 mL of sterile saline through the catheter while visualizing with ultrasound. This "fluid flush" creates turbulence that can dislodge debris and restore flow. Reposition the catheter under ultrasound guidance if flushing fails.

Percutaneous Nephrostomy Guidance

While interventional radiology typically performs definitive nephrostomy placement, intensivists may need to guide emergent drainage of obstructed, infected systems (pyonephrosis) when IR is unavailable or patient transport is prohibitive. Ultrasound guidance improves success and reduces complications.²³

Technique Overview:

  1. Position: Place patient prone or lateral decubitus with the affected side up
  2. Access Site: Target the posterolateral mid-to-lower pole calyx to avoid major vessels and minimize pleural transgression risk
  3. Needle Trajectory: Advance the needle under real-time ultrasound visualization at a 45-degree angle toward the renal pelvis, aspirating to confirm urine return
  4. Catheter Placement: Use Seldinger technique to pass guidewire, dilate tract, and place drainage catheter

Pearl: For emergent temporizing drainage of pyonephrosis when formal nephrostomy isn't immediately available, consider ultrasound-guided renal pelvis aspiration. Using a 20-22 gauge spinal needle, aspirate purulent urine for culture and decompression. This provides immediate pressure relief and source control until definitive drainage can be established.²⁴

Oyster: The renal collecting system collapses rapidly after even small-volume aspiration. Maintain guidewire position if planning catheter placement, as re-puncturing a decompressed system is significantly more difficult. Consider "one-stick" technique where guidewire is passed immediately after initial urine return.

Hack: Use a "hydro-localization" technique for challenging cases. After identifying the collecting system but before needle insertion, inject agitated saline or contrast through an existing Foley or ureteral catheter to distend the renal pelvis. This creates a larger, more visible target for needle placement.

Training and Quality Assurance

Competency in abdominal-pelvic POCUS requires structured training, supervised practice, and ongoing quality assurance. The consensus guidelines recommend minimum training standards: 25-50 supervised scans per application, cognitive training covering physics and anatomy, and regular image review with feedback.²⁵

Pearl: Develop a systematic scanning protocol (e.g., "AAAA": Aorta, Ascites, Appendix region, Aching organs) to ensure comprehensive evaluation and reduce missed findings.

Oyster: The biggest pitfall in POCUS is overconfidence leading to premature diagnostic closure. POCUS answers specific clinical questions but doesn't replace comprehensive imaging when warranted. Know your limitations and maintain low threshold for formal radiology consultation when findings are equivocal or clinical suspicion remains high despite negative POCUS.

Conclusion

Abdominal-pelvic POCUS has become an indispensable tool in critical care, providing real-time diagnostic information that guides immediate management decisions. From differentiating surgical from medical causes of acute abdomen to assessing kidney injury, measuring bladder volumes, identifying abdominal compartment syndrome, and guiding invasive procedures, ultrasound enhances patient care while reducing diagnostic delays and complications. As technology improves and training becomes more standardized, the scope and impact of POCUS will continue to expand. Intensivists must embrace this technology, pursue rigorous training, and integrate POCUS into comprehensive clinical assessment to optimize outcomes for critically ill patients.

References

  1. Frankel HL, Kirkpatrick AW, Elbarbary M, et al. Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(11):2479-2502.

  2. Levitov A, Frankel HL, Blaivas M, et al. Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(6):1206-1227.

  3. Stengel D, Rademacher G, Ekkernkamp A, et al. Emergency ultrasound-based algorithms for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(9):CD004446.

  4. von Kuenssberg Jehle D, Stiller G, Wagner D. Sensitivity in detecting free intraperitoneal fluid with the pelvic views of the FAST exam. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;21(6):476-478.

  5. Gottlieb M, Peksa GD, Pandurangadu AV, et al. Utilization of ultrasound for the evaluation of small bowel obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(2):234-242.

  6. Bourcier S, Oudjit A, Goudard G, et al. Diagnosis of non-occlusive acute mesenteric ischemia in the intensive care unit. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6(1):112.

  7. Treinen C, Lomelin D, Krause C, et al. Acute acalculous cholecystitis in the critically ill: risk factors and surgical strategies. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400(4):421-427.

  8. Barie PS, Eachempati SR. Acute acalculous cholecystitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010;39(2):343-357.

  9. Deville WL, Yzermans JC, van Duijn NP, et al. The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy. BMC Urol. 2004;4:4.

  10. O'Neill WC. Renal relevant radiology: use of ultrasound in kidney disease and nephrology procedures. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(2):373-381.

  11. Darmon M, Schortgen F, Vargas F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler renal resistive index for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a prospective study. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(1):68-76.

  12. Llach F. Hypercoagulability, renal vein thrombosis, and other thrombotic complications of nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int. 1985;28(3):429-439.

  13. Teng CH, Huang YH, Kuo BJ, Bih LI. Application of portable ultrasound scanners in the measurement of post-void residual urine. J Nurs Res. 2005;13(3):216-224.

  14. Palese A, Buchini S, Deroma L, Barbone F. The effectiveness of the ultrasound bladder scanner in reducing urinary tract infections: a meta-analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(21-22):2970-2979.

  15. Tauzin-Fin P, Sesay M, Svartz L, et al. Sublingual oxybutynin reduces postoperative pain related to indwelling bladder catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99(4):572-575.

  16. Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1190-1206.

  17. Chun R, Kirkpatrick AW, Sirois M, et al. Where's the tube? Evaluation of hand-held ultrasound in confirming enteric tube placement. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004;19(4):366-369.

  18. Abu-Yousef MM, Milam SG, Farner RM. Pulsatile portal vein flow: a sign of tricuspid regurgitation on duplex Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155(4):785-788.

  19. Malbrain ML, De Laet IE, De Waele JJ, et al. The role of abdominal compliance, the neglected parameter in critically ill patients. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46(1):1-11.

  20. Theerawanichtrakul S, Pongprapai P, Ngernsritrakul T. Diagnostic accuracy of abdominal wall thickness in detecting elevated intra-abdominal pressure in critically ill patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014;97 Suppl 1:S122-S127.

  21. Patel PA, Ernst FR, Gunnarsson CL. Evaluation of hospital complications and costs associated with using ultrasound guidance during abdominal paracentesis procedures. J Med Econ. 2012;15(1):1-7.

  22. American College of Emergency Physicians. Emergency ultrasound guidelines. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53(4):550-570.

  23. Lewis S, Patel U. Major complications after percutaneous nephrostomy-lessons from a department audit. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(2):171-179.

  24. Ramchandani P, Cardella JF, Grassi CJ, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous nephrostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(9 Pt 2):S277-S281.

  25. Expert Round Table on Ultrasound in ICU. International expert statement on training standards for critical care ultrasonography. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(7):1077-1083.


Author Disclosure: The author reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Word Count: Approximately 2,950 words 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Biomarker-based Assessment for Predicting Sepsis-induced Coagulopathy and Outcomes in Intensive Care

  Biomarker-based Assessment for Predicting Sepsis-induced Coagulopathy and Outcomes in Intensive Care Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai Abstr...