The "Iatrogenic Identity": When Treatment Creates a New Persona

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

Critical illness necessitating intensive care unit (ICU) admission frequently requires life-saving interventions including prolonged sedation, mechanical ventilation, and pharmacological support. While these interventions reduce mortality, emerging evidence suggests they may fundamentally alter patients' core personality traits, cognitive function, and sense of self. This phenomenon—the "iatrogenic identity"—represents an underrecognized consequence of critical care that challenges our understanding of successful outcomes. This review examines the neurobiological mechanisms underlying treatment-induced personality changes, explores the psychosocial implications for patients and families, and proposes integrative therapeutic approaches to support identity reconciliation in ICU survivors.

Keywords: Post-intensive care syndrome, personality change, sedation, ICU-acquired delirium, neuropsychological sequelae, identity integration

Introduction

The modern ICU saves lives through technological sophistication and pharmacological precision. However, beneath our mortality metrics lies a disquieting reality: approximately 30-50% of ICU survivors experience persistent cognitive impairment equivalent to mild Alzheimer's disease or moderate traumatic brain injury, with many also reporting profound personality alterations that strain familial relationships and personal identity.

The concept of "iatrogenic identity" encompasses the constellation of treatment-induced changes that fundamentally alter who a person is, not merely how they function. As intensivists, we must confront an uncomfortable question: In our quest to preserve biological life, have we adequately considered what constitutes meaningful survival?

Pearl: The patient who leaves your ICU is neurobiologically different from the one who arrived—not just temporarily sedated, but potentially permanently altered at the level of neural architecture and personality structure.

The Pharmacology of Personality: Neurobiological Mechanisms of Identity Alteration

Sedatives and the Architecture of Self

The relationship between prolonged sedation and personality change extends beyond simple drug effects. Benzodiazepines, propofol, and dexmedetomidine—mainstays of ICU sedation—modulate GABAergic and α2-adrenergic pathways that fundamentally influence memory consolidation, emotional regulation, and executive function.

Benzodiazepines create anterograde amnesia through their action on GABA-A receptors in the hippocampus, disrupting the encoding of episodic memories that form the narrative continuity of selfhood. More insidiously, prolonged benzodiazepine exposure causes downregulation of GABA receptors and alterations in neurosteroid production, potentially creating lasting changes in anxiety processing and emotional reactivity.

Propofol, while offering titratable sedation, acts on GABA-A receptors throughout the cortex and subcortical structures. Emerging evidence suggests that prolonged propofol infusion may induce mitochondrial dysfunction in neurons, particularly affecting the prefrontal cortex—the seat of executive function, personality expression, and self-regulation.

Oyster: The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) measures sedation depth but provides no information about the neuroplastic changes occurring beneath that sedation. A RASS of -2 may represent optimal "light sedation" acutely, but cumulative exposure time matters more than depth for long-term cognitive outcomes.

Opioids and Emotional Recalibration

ICU patients often receive massive opioid doses—morphine equivalents exceeding 500mg/day are not uncommon in mechanically ventilated patients. Chronic opioid exposure causes μ-receptor desensitization and alterations in endogenous opioid systems that regulate reward processing, social bonding, and emotional pain perception. Post-ICU, many patients describe feeling "emotionally flat" or "disconnected from others"—a state consistent with dysregulated endogenous opioid tone.

Delirium: The Crucible of Cognitive Destruction

ICU-acquired delirium affects 60-80% of mechanically ventilated patients and represents a neurological emergency, not merely "ICU psychosis." Delirium involves widespread neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier disruption, neurotransmitter imbalances, and accelerated neuronal apoptosis, particularly in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Each day of delirium increases the risk of long-term cognitive impairment by 20%.

Hack: Implement the "ABCDEF bundle" religiously—Assess/prevent pain, Both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials, Choice of sedation (avoid benzodiazepines), Delirium assessment/management, Early mobility, Family engagement. Bundled interventions reduce delirium duration by 40% and improve cognitive outcomes at one year.

Corticosteroids and Emotional Dysregulation

High-dose corticosteroids, commonly used for septic shock, ARDS, and inflammatory conditions, profoundly affect personality and mood. Glucocorticoids alter hippocampal neurogenesis, modify amygdala reactivity, and change prefrontal cortical function, creating a substrate for anxiety disorders, depression, and personality changes that may persist long after drug discontinuation.

Critical Illness Polyneuropathy and Embodied Identity

The body is not separate from identity—it is the medium through which we experience selfhood. Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy affect up to 50% of septic patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation, creating profound physical disability that forces identity reconstruction. The marathon runner becomes wheelchair-dependent; the surgeon loses fine motor control. These are not merely functional losses but existential disruptions.

Pearl: Memory is embodied. Physical rehabilitation is psychological rehabilitation. Early mobilization protocols improve not only physical function but also cognitive outcomes and emotional well-being.

The "ICU-Induced Self": Recognizing and Validating Identity Disruption

The Phenomenology of Estrangement

Families consistently report that their loved one seems "different"—less spontaneous, more irritable, emotionally withdrawn, or behaviorally disinhibited. Qualitative studies reveal that ICU survivors describe feeling like "strangers to themselves," experiencing discontinuity between pre-ICU and post-ICU selves.

Common presentations of the "ICU-induced self" include:

Cognitive-Personality Syndrome: Executive dysfunction manifesting as impulsivity, poor judgment, emotional lability, and reduced insight—essentially frontal lobe syndrome from diffuse brain injury.
Affective Flattening: Reduced emotional range and responsiveness, often mistaken for depression but representing fundamental changes in emotional processing capacity.
Identity Fragmentation: Inability to integrate ICU experiences with pre-existing life narrative, creating psychological discontinuity.
Post-Traumatic Personality Change: Persistent alterations in self-perception, worldview, and interpersonal style consistent with ICD-11's diagnosis of complex PTSD.

The Ethical Dimension: Saving Lives, Losing Persons

This confronts us with profound ethical tensions. Informed consent for ICU treatments typically focuses on mortality risk, not identity risk. Advance directives emphasize "quality of life" but rarely contemplate the possibility that the person making decisions and the person surviving treatment might, in meaningful ways, not be the same individual.

Oyster: We obtain consent for procedures with 5% complication rates but rarely discuss the 30-50% risk of permanent cognitive impairment or personality change associated with critical illness and its treatment. Is this truly informed consent?

Consider the family facing withdrawal of life support. They make decisions based on what "Dad would have wanted," but if Dad survives with fundamental personality alterations, can he truly be said to have "gotten what he wanted"? The philosophical complexity here rivals the clinical complexity.

Family Systems Disruption

Spousal relationships show particularly high strain, with divorce rates 2-3 times higher among ICU survivor couples compared to general population. The phenomenon of "caregiver ambiguous loss"—grieving the person who was while caring for the person who is—creates psychological distress without social recognition or support structures.

Children struggle profoundly when a parent returns "different." The secure attachment figure has become unpredictable, emotionally unavailable, or behaviorally strange. This represents childhood trauma poorly captured by our outcome metrics.

Hack: Implement family ICU diaries—daily entries by family and staff documenting what happened, providing photos, explaining procedures. ICU diaries reduce PTSD symptoms in both patients and families by creating narrative continuity and shared memory.

Neuropsychological Assessment and Monitoring

Screening Tools

Post-ICU cognitive assessment should be standard of care, not an afterthought. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) provides quick screening (10 minutes) with sensitivity to the executive dysfunction and attention deficits typical of ICU survivors. Scores below 26 warrant formal neuropsychological evaluation.

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) screens for mood disorders, while the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) assesses PTSD symptoms. Personality changes require more sophisticated assessment through the NEO Personality Inventory or clinical interview by neuropsychologists.

Pearl: Assess cognitive function before ICU discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-discharge. Early identification enables early intervention, which improves outcomes.

Neuroimaging Correlates

MRI studies of ICU survivors reveal reduced hippocampal and frontal lobe volumes, white matter changes consistent with small vessel disease, and alterations in functional connectivity. While not routinely indicated, neuroimaging may help explain severe cognitive deficits and guide prognosis.

Neuropsychoanalytic Support: Integrating the Fragmented Self

Theoretical Framework

Identity integration requires therapeutic approaches that bridge neuroscience and psychotherapy. Neuropsychoanalysis provides a framework for understanding how brain changes create subjective experiences of identity disruption and how psychological interventions can facilitate neuroplastic adaptation.

Phase 1: Validation and Psychoeducation (Weeks 1-4 Post-ICU)

Patients and families need explicit acknowledgment that personality changes are real, common, and have biological substrates—not character flaws or "giving up." Psychoeducation about expected recovery trajectory reduces anxiety and provides hope.

Hack: Create a "recovery roadmap" document explaining typical cognitive and emotional recovery patterns, with timelines (most improvement in first 6 months, continued gains possible to 2 years). Normalize setbacks and plateaus.

Phase 2: Narrative Reconstruction (Months 1-6)

ICU experiences often exist as fragmented, delusional memories or complete amnesia. Narrative exposure therapy, adapted for ICU survivors, helps integrate traumatic memories by creating coherent stories that connect pre-ICU, ICU, and post-ICU experiences.

Family involvement is crucial—they provide the missing narrative pieces and validate the patient's pre-ICU identity while accepting post-ICU changes.

Phase 3: Identity Integration (Months 3-12)

Rather than seeking to "return to normal," therapy focuses on accepting and integrating the "new normal." This involves:

Grief work for lost aspects of self
Strengths identification recognizing post-ICU growth or resilience
Relational recalibration rebuilding intimate relationships based on current reality
Existential meaning-making finding purpose in survival

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) shows particular promise, helping patients accept cognitive limitations while committing to valued actions despite constraints.

Phase 4: Ongoing Adaptation (Year 1+)

Long-term support through ICU survivor peer groups provides normalization and practical coping strategies. Structured ICU follow-up clinics with multidisciplinary teams (intensivist, neuropsychologist, psychiatrist, physical therapist) improve quality of life and reduce rehospitalization.

Pharmacological Adjuncts

While no medications reverse post-ICU cognitive impairment, targeted treatment may help:

SSRIs/SNRIs for comorbid depression/anxiety
Stimulants (methylphenidate) for attention deficits, used cautiously
Cholinesterase inhibitors show modest benefit in severe cases, though evidence is limited
Avoid benzodiazepines which worsen cognitive function

Oyster: Pharmacological "quick fixes" are tempting but rarely effective. The work of identity integration is psychological, social, and existential—medication can support but not replace this work.

Prevention: Rethinking ICU Culture

The best treatment for iatrogenic identity is prevention. This requires cultural transformation in how we practice critical care:

Minimize sedation: Target RASS 0 to -1, using dexmedetomidine preferentially over benzodiazepines and propofol when possible.
Prevent delirium: Environmental orientation (clocks, windows, family presence), sleep hygiene, early mobility, medication review.
Humanize the ICU: Music therapy, personalization of space, maintaining circadian rhythms, facilitating communication.
Include families: Open visitation, family participation in care, psychological support for family members.
Discuss outcomes honestly: Include cognitive and personality risks in consent discussions and goals-of-care conversations.

Pearl: Every sedation holiday, every day without delirium, every hour of early mobilization is an investment in preserving the person, not just the body.

Conclusion

The "iatrogenic identity" represents one of critical care's most profound challenges—saving lives while fundamentally altering the persons we save. As intensivists, we must expand our definition of successful outcomes beyond mortality to encompass meaningful preservation of personhood, cognitive function, and identity continuity.

This requires systemic changes: routine cognitive screening, multidisciplinary follow-up clinics, integration of neuropsychological support into post-ICU care, and honest conversations with patients and families about the real risks of critical illness and its treatment.

The patient is not merely a collection of organ systems to be optimized but a person—with memories, relationships, and a sense of self that deserves preservation as much as their cardiovascular stability. When we intubate, sedate, and support, we must remember that beneath the monitors and medications lies someone's identity, fragile and precious, that we have a duty to protect.

Final Pearl: The measure of critical care excellence is not just who survives, but who they are when they leave us.

References

Pandharipande PP, et al. Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1306-1316.
Needham DM, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):502-509.
Riker RR, Fraser GL. Altering intensive care sedation paradigms to improve patient outcomes. Crit Care Clin. 2009;25(3):527-538.
Barr J, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):263-306.
Ely EW. The ABCDEF bundle: science and philosophy of how ICU liberation serves patients and families. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(2):321-330.
Girard TD, et al. Delirium as a predictor of long-term cognitive impairment in survivors of critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(7):1513-1520.
Patel MB, et al. Rapidly reversible, sedation-related delirium versus persistent delirium in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(6):658-665.
Hopkins RO, et al. Neuropsychological sequelae and impaired health status in survivors of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(1):50-56.
Jackson JC, et al. Depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and functional disability in survivors of critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(5):1125-1135.
Davydow DS, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder in general intensive care unit survivors. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30(5):421-434.
Mikkelsen ME, et al. The adult survivor of sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(4):1536-1539.
Wintermann GB, et al. Stress disorders following prolonged critical illness in survivors of severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(6):1213-1222.
Garrouste-Orgeas M, et al. Writing in and reading ICU diaries: qualitative study of families' experience in the ICU. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110146.
Jones C, et al. Intensive care diaries reduce new onset post traumatic stress disorder following critical illness. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R168.
Needham DM, et al. Physical and cognitive performance of patients with acute lung injury 1 year after initial trophic versus full enteral feeding. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(5):567-576.
Schweickert WD, et al. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients. Lancet. 2009;373(9678):1874-1882.
Bench S, et al. Developing family-centred care in the intensive care unit. Nurs Crit Care. 2011;16(4):186-193.
Azoulay E, et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(8):3044-3049.
Cameron JI, et al. One-year outcomes in caregivers of critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(19):1831-1841.
Choi J, et al. Symptoms of PTSD in family members of intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care. 2018;47:206-211.
Elliott D, et al. Exploring the scope of post-intensive care syndrome therapy and care. Am J Crit Care. 2014;23(3):179-191.
Griffiths JA, et al. Recovery from intensive care syndrome. J Intensive Care Soc. 2013;14(1):6-14.
Herridge MS, et al. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1293-1304.
Iwashyna TJ, et al. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA. 2010;304(16):1787-1794.
Hopkins RO, Jackson JC. Assessing neurocognitive outcomes after critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(3):943-945.
Jackson JC, et al. Cognitive and physical rehabilitation of intensive care unit survivors. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(4):1088-1097.
Hopkins RO, et al. Two-year cognitive, emotional, and quality-of-life outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(4):340-347.
Wilcox ME, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in ICU patients. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(1):206-215.
Peris A, et al. From intensive care unit to home. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011;77(9):938-945.
Cuthbertson BH, et al. Quality of life before and after intensive care. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(4):332-339.
Jensen JF, et al. A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2016;33:15-19.
Mehlhorn J, et al. Rehabilitation interventions for postintensive care syndrome. Crit Care. 2014;18(3):R28.

Word Count: 2,000

Conflicts of Interest: None declared

learningmedicine

Thursday, November 13, 2025