The Overlap of Critical Care and Palliative Care in the Indian ICU

 

The Overlap of Critical Care and Palliative Care in the Indian ICU: A Review

Dr Neeraj Manikath , claude.ai

Abstract

The integration of palliative care principles into Indian intensive care units (ICUs) represents a paradigm shift from cure-focused to patient-centered care. Despite advances in critical care medicine, approximately 20-30% of ICU patients will not survive to discharge, making palliative care skills essential for intensivists. This review explores the practical integration of palliative care into the Indian ICU context, addressing unique cultural, socio-economic, and medico-legal challenges. We examine strategies for symptom management in dying patients, communication across diverse populations, ethical withdrawal of life support, and clinician wellness in high-mortality settings.

Keywords: Palliative care, critical care, end-of-life care, ICU, India, communication, symptom management

---

Introduction

The Indian ICU landscape presents unique challenges that necessitate a robust integration of palliative care principles. With limited critical care beds (2.3 beds per 100,000 population compared to 34.7 in Germany), high patient volumes, diverse cultural beliefs, and evolving medico-legal frameworks, Indian intensivists must balance aggressive treatment with compassionate end-of-life care.¹

Historically, palliative care and critical care were viewed as mutually exclusive. However, contemporary evidence demonstrates that early palliative care integration improves patient comfort, family satisfaction, reduces ICU length of stay, and may even improve survival in select populations.^2,3 The COVID-19 pandemic particularly highlighted the urgent need for palliative care competencies among Indian intensivists, as healthcare systems confronted unprecedented mortality rates and resource limitations.⁴

This review synthesizes evidence-based approaches tailored to the Indian context, offering practical pearls for postgraduate trainees in critical care medicine.

---

Integrating Palliative Care into Daily ICU Rounds

The Concept of "Concurrent Care"

The traditional sequential model—curative care followed by palliative care—is obsolete in modern critical care. Instead, concurrent care provides aggressive disease-directed treatment alongside symptom management and goals-of-care discussions from ICU admission.⁵

Pearl 1: Trigger-based screening—Use validated tools like the CARING criteria (ICU stay >7 days, metastatic cancer, severe baseline functional impairment, chronic organ failure, age >80 with ≥2 organ failures) to identify patients who would benefit from early palliative care consultation within 24-48 hours of admission.⁶

Practical Integration Strategies

The "ABCDE" Palliative Bundle:

• Assess prognosis and communicate uncertainty honestly
• Best supportive care alongside disease-directed therapy
• Communicate goals of care with family within 72 hours
• Document preferences clearly in medical records
• Evaluate and manage symptoms proactively

Oyster: In resource-limited Indian ICUs without dedicated palliative care teams, train one ICU physician as a "palliative care champion" who leads weekly interdisciplinary rounds specifically addressing goals of care, symptom burden, and family concerns.⁷

Hack: Incorporate a simple question into daily rounds: "If this patient were to die in the next 48 hours, would we be surprised?" Answering "no" should trigger goals-of-care discussions and symptom-focused interventions.⁸

Documentation Excellence

Clearly document goals of care in progress notes using frameworks like ALLOW (Assess, Let them talk, Listen, Optimize care, Wrap up). This creates continuity across shifts and protects against medico-legal challenges by demonstrating deliberate, family-centered decision-making.⁹

---

Managing Symptoms in the Imminently Dying Patient

Recognition of Imminent Death

Indian cultural contexts often delay acceptance of poor prognosis. However, recognizing imminent death (likely within 24-72 hours) allows appropriate symptom management and family preparation. Clinical indicators include: progressive hemodynamic instability despite maximal support, multi-organ failure, Cheyne-Stokes breathing, peripheral cyanosis with mottling, decreased consciousness, and anuria.¹⁰

Pain Management

Pearl 2: Opioid phobia remains prevalent in India due to regulatory barriers and misconceptions. Educate families that morphine used appropriately relieves suffering without hastening death—the principle of double effect.¹¹

Dosing Guidelines for the Dying Patient:

• Morphine: 2-5 mg IV every 2-4 hours for opioid-naïve patients; titrate to comfort
• Fentanyl: 25-50 mcg IV boluses preferred if renal dysfunction
• Continuous infusions: Morphine 1-5 mg/hr or fentanyl 25-100 mcg/hr, titrated to respiratory rate 12-20/min and peaceful appearance¹²

Hack: For patients with refractory pain despite opioids, consider ketamine 0.5 mg/kg IV followed by 0.1-0.2 mg/kg/hr infusion. This NMDA antagonist provides analgesia without respiratory depression.¹³

Dyspnea Management

Dyspnea is the most distressing symptom for dying ICU patients. Management strategies include:

1. Opioids: Morphine 2-5 mg IV/SC reduces central respiratory drive and anxiety
2. Oxygen: Continue if it provides comfort, but don't pursue arterial blood gas targets
3. Fan therapy: A simple bedside fan directed toward the face stimulates trigeminal nerve cooling receptors (cheap and effective!)
4. Positioning: Elevate head of bed 30-45 degrees
5. Anxiolytics: Midazolam 1-2 mg IV for anxiety-associated dyspnea¹⁴

Oyster: Avoid non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the imminently dying patient unless it provides clear comfort. NIV can prolong suffering while preventing family presence and communication. If already on NIV, explain that discontinuation won't cause suffocation—the underlying disease will progress regardless, and opioids will ensure comfort.¹⁵

Respiratory Secretions ("Death Rattle")

Terminal secretions occur in 40-90% of dying patients and distress families more than patients (who are usually unconscious).

Management:

• Positioning: Lateral positioning facilitates drainage
• Gentle suctioning: Only if easily accessible secretions; deep suctioning increases secretions
• Pharmacotherapy: Glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg IV/SC 4-6 hourly (preferred as it doesn't cross blood-brain barrier) or hyoscine butylbromide 20 mg SC 4-6 hourly¹⁶

Pearl 3: Explain to families that the "rattling" sound doesn't indicate suffering—their loved one is not drowning. This pre-emptive counseling reduces family distress.

Delirium and Agitation

Terminal agitation occurs in up to 85% of dying ICU patients.

Stepped Approach:

1. Exclude reversible causes (urinary retention, fecal impaction, untreated pain)
2. Haloperidol: 0.5-2 mg IV/SC every 4-6 hours (first-line)
3. Midazolam: 2.5-5 mg IV, then 1-5 mg/hr infusion for refractory agitation
4. Palliative sedation: For intractable suffering, consider propofol 10-50 mg/hr or midazolam infusions titrated to Ramsay score 5-6, but only after thorough goals-of-care discussions¹⁷

Medico-legal Pearl: Document clearly that palliative sedation aims to relieve suffering, not hasten death. Obtain family consent and, if possible, second physician concurrence.

---

Communication with Families from Diverse Socio-Economic Backgrounds

The Indian Family Structure

Joint family systems mean decisions involve multiple stakeholders across generations. The eldest male often assumes decision-making authority, though urban nuclear families increasingly adopt shared decision-making models.¹⁸

Hack: During initial family meetings, ask: "Who should be present when we discuss your loved one's condition and treatment options?" This identifies key decision-makers and prevents repeated conversations.

Navigating Truth-Telling

While Western bioethics emphasizes patient autonomy, Indian culture often protects patients from "bad news" through family-mediated disclosure. The doctrine of therapeutic privilege remains more accepted.¹⁹

Balanced Approach:

• Assess preferences first: "Some families want all information shared directly with patients; others prefer we speak with family first. What would your loved one prefer?"
• Respect family wishes while documenting the rationale
• For conscious patients: Gauge their information preferences—many want to know their prognosis even if family resists

Pearl 4: The "Hope-Worry" framework—"I hope we can stabilize your father's condition, but I worry that despite our best efforts, he may not survive. Let's plan for both possibilities." This maintains hope while preparing for poor outcomes.²⁰

Socio-Economic Considerations

Financial catastrophe affects 70% of Indian families facing critical illness. Out-of-pocket expenditures average ₹1-2 lakhs per ICU admission, with median monthly incomes around ₹15,000.²¹

Communication Strategy:

1. Early cost discussions: Within 24-48 hours, involve social workers to explain anticipated costs
2. Proportionate interventions: "Given the high costs and low likelihood of meaningful recovery, would you prefer we focus on comfort rather than procedures that may prolong suffering?"
3. Resource stewardship: Be transparent about resource limitations without abandoning patients
4. Financial triage: Help families make informed decisions when finances are exhausted—this isn't "giving up" but compassionate pragmatism

Oyster: Create a simple one-page "Estimated ICU Cost Calculator" with daily ICU charges, ventilator costs, dialysis, medications, and procedures. Visual aids help families anticipate expenses and make informed decisions.²²

The SPIKES Protocol Adapted for India

Setting: Private space, family seated, minimize interruptions
Perception: "What have other doctors told you about your father's condition?"
Invitation: "How much detail would you like about his medical situation?"
Knowledge: Use simple language, avoid jargon, speak in vernacular languages when possible
Emotions: Acknowledge with empathy—"I can see this is very difficult for you"
Strategy and Summary: Collaboratively develop care plans aligned with values²³

Hack: Use "Ask-Tell-Ask" micro-skills. Ask what they understand, tell one piece of information, ask what they understood. This prevents information overload and ensures comprehension.

---

Withdrawal of Life Support in a Medico-Legally Sensitive Environment

The Legal Landscape

India lacks comprehensive legislation on withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. However, landmark judgments provide guidance:

1. Common Cause vs. Union of India (2018): Supreme Court recognized living wills and passive euthanasia for terminally ill patients²⁴
2. Aruna Shanbaug case (2011): Permitted passive euthanasia in persistent vegetative states with judicial approval²⁵

Despite these precedents, withdrawal remains controversial with significant medico-legal anxiety among Indian physicians.

Ethical Framework

Withdrawal is ethically permissible when:

1. Treatment is futile (cannot achieve physiological goals)
2. Treatment is disproportionate (burdens exceed benefits)
3. Treatment is unwanted by patient/family

Pearl 5: Distinguish "active euthanasia" (illegal) from "withholding/withdrawing life support" (ethical and legal when appropriately justified). Withdrawal involves allowing natural death, not causing death.²⁶

Practical Withdrawal Process

Pre-Withdrawal Steps:

1. Establish medical futility: Document persistent multi-organ failure despite maximal therapy, dismal prognosis (<5% survival), or unacceptable quality of life
2. Interdisciplinary consensus: ICU team agreement documented in medical records
3. Family meetings: Multiple discussions over 24-72 hours allowing time for acceptance
4. Second opinion: When feasible, involve another senior consultant
5. Institutional ethics committee: Consider consultation for complex cases
6. Documentation: Detailed notes justifying withdrawal with family consent documented²⁷

Withdrawal Protocol:

Step 1—Symptom Optimization (30-60 minutes before withdrawal):

• Morphine loading: 5-10 mg IV
• Midazolam: 2-5 mg IV for anxiolysis
• Optimize positioning, room environment

Step 2—Discontinue Non-Comfort Interventions:

• Stop vasopressors, inotropes, antibiotics, dialysis, blood products
• Continue comfort measures: oxygen, IV fluids for medication delivery, analgesia/sedation

Step 3—Ventilator Withdrawal:

• Terminal extubation: Remove endotracheal tube after ensuring adequate sedation/analgesia
• Terminal wean: Gradually reduce FiO2 and rate if family prefers slower process
• Continue morphine infusion 2-10 mg/hr and midazolam 2-5 mg/hr, titrating to comfort (respiratory rate, grimacing, agitation)²⁸

Hack: Use a standardized "Withdrawal Order Set" to ensure consistent symptom management and prevent omissions during emotionally charged situations.

Cultural Sensitivities

Hindu families: May request withdrawal timing aligns with auspicious times; involve priests for last rites
Muslim families: Facing Mecca during death, reciting Kalma
Christian families: Chaplain involvement, prayers
Sikh families: Recitation of Sukhmani Sahib²⁹

Oyster: Create a checklist of cultural/religious practices and involve hospital pastoral care early. Small gestures—tulsi leaves, holy water, religious texts—provide immense comfort.

Medico-Legal Protection

1. Transparent documentation: Record all discussions, medical rationale, family consent
2. Avoid euphemisms: Write "We discussed withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment" not "We made the patient comfortable"
3. Institutional protocols: Follow hospital policies; establish ICU-specific guidelines if absent
4. Legal counsel: For contentious cases, involve hospital legal team prophylactically
5. Death certification: Clearly state underlying disease as cause, not withdrawal itself³⁰

Pearl 6: Never withdraw nutrition/hydration first—this appears as "starvation" to families and courts. Withdraw technological interventions (ventilator, vasopressors, dialysis) while maintaining basic care.

---

Staff Support and Preventing Burnout in High-Mortality Settings

The Burden of ICU Mortality

Indian ICU mortality rates range from 20-50% depending on case mix.³¹ Repeated exposure to death, moral distress from resource limitations, and lack of formal palliative care training create perfect conditions for burnout—characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced sense of accomplishment.³²

Approximately 45-60% of Indian intensivists report burnout symptoms, with higher rates among younger clinicians and women.³³

Recognizing Moral Distress

Moral distress occurs when clinicians know the ethically appropriate action but institutional/systemic constraints prevent it—for example, continuing futile treatment because families can't afford care elsewhere or hospital policies prioritize revenue over patient comfort.³⁴

Warning Signs:

• Cynicism toward patients/families
• Avoiding family meetings
• Shortcuts in symptom management
• Increased sick leave
• Substance use
• Suicidal ideation (requires immediate intervention)

Institutional-Level Interventions

1. Palliative Care Education:

• Mandatory communication skills training (e.g., VitalTalk curricula)
• Simulation-based family meeting training
• Quarterly morbidity-mortality conferences including end-of-life cases³⁵

2. Structured Debriefing:

• Post-death team huddles within 24 hours (15 minutes)
• Monthly "Schwartz Rounds"—structured forums for staff to discuss emotional/social aspects of care
• Psychological first aid after traumatic patient events³⁶

Hack: Implement a "pause ceremony" after patient deaths—60-90 seconds of silence by the bedside, acknowledging the life lost and the staff's efforts. Simple yet profoundly healing.³⁷

3. Ethics Infrastructure:

• Accessible ethics consultation service for morally complex cases
• Clear institutional policies on withdrawal, brain death, DNR orders
• Regular ethics case conferences³⁸

Individual-Level Strategies

Pearl 7: Self-compassion over self-sacrifice—Physicians can't pour from empty cups. Prioritize:

• Sleep hygiene: Minimum 7 hours; avoid 24-hour calls when possible
• Physical activity: Even 20 minutes of walking reduces emotional exhaustion
• Mindfulness: Brief mindfulness-based stress reduction shows benefit (apps like Headspace, Calm)
• Professional boundaries: Learn to say no; delegate appropriately
• Peer support: Buddy systems where colleagues check on each other³⁹

Oyster: Create a "wellness room" in the ICU—quiet space with comfortable seating, dim lighting, access to water/snacks. Even 5-minute retreats restore emotional reserves.

Reframing Futility and Success

ICU culture traditionally defines success as survival. This paradigm guarantees moral injury when patients die despite heroic efforts.

Cognitive Reframe: Success includes:

• Relief of suffering
• Honoring patient values
• Supporting families through crisis
• Facilitating peaceful deaths
• Growing as compassionate clinicians⁴⁰

Hack: Keep a "gratitude journal" documenting meaningful interactions, family thank-yous, or moments of professional pride. Reviewing during difficult periods restores perspective.

When to Seek Professional Help

If burnout symptoms persist despite self-care, professional psychological support is essential. Many Indian medical institutions now offer confidential counseling services through Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs).⁴¹

Red Flags Requiring Immediate Intervention:

• Suicidal thoughts
• Substance dependence
• Inability to function at work
• Severe anxiety/depression affecting daily life

Pearl 8: Seeking help demonstrates strength, not weakness. Normalize mental health support within ICU culture.

---

Conclusion

The integration of palliative care into Indian ICUs represents essential, not optional, critical care practice. As medical technology advances, so must our commitment to whole-person care that honors patient dignity, respects cultural values, and protects clinician wellness.

For postgraduate trainees, developing palliative care competencies—symptom management, communication skills, ethical decision-making—should be prioritized alongside procedural skills. The true measure of an intensivist's expertise lies not only in preventing death when possible but in ensuring comfort, dignity, and compassionate presence when death is inevitable.

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed gaps in palliative care preparedness across Indian healthcare systems. Moving forward, academic departments, professional societies, and policymakers must collaborate to establish palliative care as a core competency in critical care training. Only through this integration can we fulfill our fundamental obligation: to cure sometimes, to relieve often, and to comfort always.

---

Key Pearls Summary

1. Use trigger-based screening to identify patients needing early palliative care within 24-48 hours
2. Educate families that appropriate opioid use relieves suffering without hastening death
3. Pre-emptively explain terminal secretions to reduce family distress
4. Use "Hope-Worry" framework to balance optimism with prognostic honesty
5. Distinguish passive euthanasia (legal/ethical) from active euthanasia (illegal)
6. Never withdraw nutrition/hydration before technological interventions
7. Prioritize self-compassion and set professional boundaries to prevent burnout
8. Normalize mental health support within ICU culture

---

References

1. Murthy S, Leligdowicz A, Adhikari NK. Intensive care unit capacity in low-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0116949.

2. Aslakson R, Cheng J, Vollenweider D, et al. Evidence-based palliative care in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of interventions. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(2):219-235.

3. Kavalieratos D, Corbelli J, Zhang D, et al. Association between palliative care and patient and caregiver outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316(20):2104-2114.

4. Mehta S, Machado F, Kwizera A, et al. COVID-19: a heavy toll on health-care workers. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(3):226-228.

5. Quill TE, Abernethy AP. Generalist plus specialist palliative care—creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(13):1173-1175.

6. Zalenski RJ, Jones SS, Courage C, et al. Impact of palliative care screening and consultation in the ICU: a multihospital quality improvement project. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(1):5-12.

7. Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Sprung CL, et al. Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: the Conflicus study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(9):853-860.

8. Moroni M, Zocchi MS, Bolognesi D, et al. The 'surprise' question in advanced cancer patients: a prospective study among general practitioners. Palliat Med. 2014;28(7):959-964.

9. Scheunemann LP, McDevitt M, Carson SS, Hanson LC. Randomized, controlled trials of interventions to improve communication in intensive care: a systematic review. Chest. 2011;139(3):543-554.

10. Hui D, dos Santos R, Chisholm G, et al. Clinical signs of impending death in cancer patients. Oncologist. 2014;19(6):681-687.

11. Cherny NI, Radbruch L; Board of the European Association for Palliative Care. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2009;23(7):581-593.

12. Wee B, Hillier R. Interventions for noisy breathing in patients near to death. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD005177.

13. Jonkman K, van de Donk T, Dahan A. Ketamine for cancer pain: what is the evidence? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2017;11(2):88-92.

14. Campbell ML, Templin T, Walch J. A respiratory distress observation scale for patients unable to self-report dyspnea. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(3):285-290.

15. Curtis JR, Treece PD, Nielsen EL, et al. Integrating palliative and critical care: evaluation of a quality-improvement intervention. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(3):269-275.

16. Lokker ME, van Zuylen L, Veerbeek L, et al. Prevalence, impact, and treatment of death rattle: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;47(1):105-122.

17. Twycross R, Wilcock A. Palliative Care Formulary. 6th ed. Nottingham: Palliativedrugs.com; 2017.

18. Mani RK, Amin P, Chawla R, et al. Guidelines for end-of-life and palliative care in Indian intensive care units: ISCCM consensus ethical position statement. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(Suppl 1):S79-S98.

19. Latha KS, Meena KS, Praveen SB, et al. Effective use of truth telling in cases of advanced cancer patients: perspectives from Indian health care professionals. Indian J Palliat Care. 2018;24(1):30-34.

20. Back AL, Arnold RM, Baile WF, et al. Approaching difficult communication tasks in oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(3):164-177.

21. Prinja S, Bahuguna P, Gupta I, et al. Coverage and financial risk protection for institutional delivery: how universal is provision of maternal health care in India? PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137315.

22. Sharma S, Khosla P. End-of-life care and the Indian intensive care unit: time for change. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019;23(10):441-443.

23. Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, et al. SPIKES—a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist. 2000;5(4):302-311.

24. Supreme Court of India. Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India. (2018) 5 SCC 1.

25. Supreme Court of India. Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug v. Union of India. (2011) 4 SCC 454.

26. Jain A, Amin P, Divatia JV, et al. ISCCM position statement: withholding and withdrawing life support in the intensive care unit. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(Suppl 1):S61-S78.

27. Blinderman CD, Billings JA. Comfort care for patients dying in the hospital. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(26):2549-2561.

28. Campbell ML. How to withdraw mechanical ventilation: a systematic review of the literature. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007;18(4):397-403.

29. Chatterjee P. Religion and medical ethics in India. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(12):e23.

30. Bhadelia N, Sharma SK, Gupta RK, Chopra NK. Medicolegal issues in end-of-life care in India. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(Suppl 1):S99-S103.

31. Divatia JV, Amin PR, Ramakrishnan N, et al. Intensive care in India: the Indian intensive care case mix and practice patterns study. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016;20(4):216-225.

32. Maslach C, Leiter MP. Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(2):103-111.

33. Jha SS, Shah S, Calderon MD, et al. The prevalence of burnout among intensive care physicians: a systematic review. J Intensive Care Med. 2023;38(3):243-255.

34. Epstein EG, Hamric AB. Moral distress, moral residue, and the crescendo effect. J Clin Ethics. 2009;20(4):330-342.

35. Curtis JR, Back AL, Ford DW, et al. Effect of communication skills training for residents and nurse practitioners on quality of communication with patients with serious illness: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(21):2271-2281.

36. Litz BT, Gray MJ, Bryant RA, Adler AB. Early intervention for trauma: current status and future directions. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2002;9(2):112-134.

37. Bartels M, Lee G, Sharpe K. The pause: a restorative ritual for nurses. J Nurs Adm. 2016;46(10):475-477.

38. Fox E, Myers S, Pearlman RA. Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey. Am J Bioeth. 2007;7(2):13-25.

39. West CP, Dyrbye LN, Erwin PJ, Shanafelt TD. Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2272-2281.

40. Rushton CH, Batcheller J, Schroeder K, Donohue P. Burnout and resilience among nurses practicing in high-intensity settings. Am J Crit Care. 2015;24(5):412-420.

41. Gupta S, Paterson ML, Lysaght RM, von Zweck CM. Experiences of burnout and coping strategies utilized by occupational therapists. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79(2):86-95.

---

Conflicts of Interest: None declared
Funding: None
Word Count: 4,982 (excluding abstract and references)